Benchmarking the predictive capability of hydrological models for river flow and flood peak predictions across over 1000 catchments in Great Britain
<p>Benchmarking model performance across large samples of catchments is useful to guide model selection and future model development. Given uncertainties in the observational data we use to drive and evaluate hydrological models, and uncertainties in the structure and parameterisation of model...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
Online Access: | https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/23/4011/2019/hess-23-4011-2019.pdf |
_version_ | 1818324841042804736 |
---|---|
author | R. A. Lane G. Coxon J. E. Freer J. E. Freer T. Wagener T. Wagener P. J. Johnes P. J. Johnes J. P. Bloomfield S. Greene C. J. A. Macleod S. M. Reaney |
author_facet | R. A. Lane G. Coxon J. E. Freer J. E. Freer T. Wagener T. Wagener P. J. Johnes P. J. Johnes J. P. Bloomfield S. Greene C. J. A. Macleod S. M. Reaney |
author_sort | R. A. Lane |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <p>Benchmarking model performance across large samples of
catchments is useful to guide model selection and future model development.
Given uncertainties in the observational data we use to drive and evaluate
hydrological models, and uncertainties in the structure and parameterisation
of models we use to produce hydrological simulations and predictions, it is
essential that model evaluation is undertaken within an uncertainty analysis
framework. Here, we benchmark the capability of several lumped hydrological
models across Great Britain by focusing on daily flow and peak flow
simulation. Four hydrological model structures from the Framework for
Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE) were applied to over 1000 catchments
in England, Wales and Scotland. Model performance was then evaluated using
standard performance metrics for daily flows and novel performance metrics
for peak flows considering parameter uncertainty.</p>
<p>Our results show that lumped hydrological models were able to produce
adequate simulations across most of Great Britain, with each model producing
simulations exceeding a 0.5 Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency for at least 80 % of
catchments. All four models showed a similar spatial pattern of performance,
producing better simulations in the wetter catchments to the west and poor
model performance in central Scotland and south-eastern England. Poor model performance
was often linked to the catchment water balance, with models unable to
capture the catchment hydrology where the water balance did not close.
Overall, performance was similar between model structures, but different
models performed better for different catchment characteristics and metrics,
as well as for assessing daily or peak flows, leading to the ensemble of
model structures outperforming any single structure, thus demonstrating the
value of using multi-model structures across a large sample of different
catchment behaviours.</p>
<p>This research evaluates what conceptual lumped models can achieve as a
performance benchmark and provides interesting insights into where
and why these simple models may fail. The large number of river catchments
included in this study makes it an appropriate benchmark for any future
developments of a national model of Great Britain.</p> |
first_indexed | 2024-12-13T11:34:59Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-06676797e0d242d68058b69128409b40 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1027-5606 1607-7938 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-13T11:34:59Z |
publishDate | 2019-09-01 |
publisher | Copernicus Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-06676797e0d242d68058b69128409b402022-12-21T23:47:48ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382019-09-01234011403210.5194/hess-23-4011-2019Benchmarking the predictive capability of hydrological models for river flow and flood peak predictions across over 1000 catchments in Great BritainR. A. Lane0G. Coxon1J. E. Freer2J. E. Freer3T. Wagener4T. Wagener5P. J. Johnes6P. J. Johnes7J. P. Bloomfield8S. Greene9C. J. A. Macleod10S. M. Reaney11School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2NQ, UKSchool of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2NQ, UKSchool of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2NQ, UKCabot Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2NQ, UKFaculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2NQ, UKCabot Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2NQ, UKSchool of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2NQ, UKCabot Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2NQ, UKBritish Geological Survey, Maclean Building, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UKTrinity College Dublin, Dublin, IrelandThe James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, UKDepartment of Geography, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK<p>Benchmarking model performance across large samples of catchments is useful to guide model selection and future model development. Given uncertainties in the observational data we use to drive and evaluate hydrological models, and uncertainties in the structure and parameterisation of models we use to produce hydrological simulations and predictions, it is essential that model evaluation is undertaken within an uncertainty analysis framework. Here, we benchmark the capability of several lumped hydrological models across Great Britain by focusing on daily flow and peak flow simulation. Four hydrological model structures from the Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE) were applied to over 1000 catchments in England, Wales and Scotland. Model performance was then evaluated using standard performance metrics for daily flows and novel performance metrics for peak flows considering parameter uncertainty.</p> <p>Our results show that lumped hydrological models were able to produce adequate simulations across most of Great Britain, with each model producing simulations exceeding a 0.5 Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency for at least 80 % of catchments. All four models showed a similar spatial pattern of performance, producing better simulations in the wetter catchments to the west and poor model performance in central Scotland and south-eastern England. Poor model performance was often linked to the catchment water balance, with models unable to capture the catchment hydrology where the water balance did not close. Overall, performance was similar between model structures, but different models performed better for different catchment characteristics and metrics, as well as for assessing daily or peak flows, leading to the ensemble of model structures outperforming any single structure, thus demonstrating the value of using multi-model structures across a large sample of different catchment behaviours.</p> <p>This research evaluates what conceptual lumped models can achieve as a performance benchmark and provides interesting insights into where and why these simple models may fail. The large number of river catchments included in this study makes it an appropriate benchmark for any future developments of a national model of Great Britain.</p>https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/23/4011/2019/hess-23-4011-2019.pdf |
spellingShingle | R. A. Lane G. Coxon J. E. Freer J. E. Freer T. Wagener T. Wagener P. J. Johnes P. J. Johnes J. P. Bloomfield S. Greene C. J. A. Macleod S. M. Reaney Benchmarking the predictive capability of hydrological models for river flow and flood peak predictions across over 1000 catchments in Great Britain Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
title | Benchmarking the predictive capability of hydrological models for river flow and flood peak predictions across over 1000 catchments in Great Britain |
title_full | Benchmarking the predictive capability of hydrological models for river flow and flood peak predictions across over 1000 catchments in Great Britain |
title_fullStr | Benchmarking the predictive capability of hydrological models for river flow and flood peak predictions across over 1000 catchments in Great Britain |
title_full_unstemmed | Benchmarking the predictive capability of hydrological models for river flow and flood peak predictions across over 1000 catchments in Great Britain |
title_short | Benchmarking the predictive capability of hydrological models for river flow and flood peak predictions across over 1000 catchments in Great Britain |
title_sort | benchmarking the predictive capability of hydrological models for river flow and flood peak predictions across over 1000 catchments in great britain |
url | https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/23/4011/2019/hess-23-4011-2019.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ralane benchmarkingthepredictivecapabilityofhydrologicalmodelsforriverflowandfloodpeakpredictionsacrossover1000catchmentsingreatbritain AT gcoxon benchmarkingthepredictivecapabilityofhydrologicalmodelsforriverflowandfloodpeakpredictionsacrossover1000catchmentsingreatbritain AT jefreer benchmarkingthepredictivecapabilityofhydrologicalmodelsforriverflowandfloodpeakpredictionsacrossover1000catchmentsingreatbritain AT jefreer benchmarkingthepredictivecapabilityofhydrologicalmodelsforriverflowandfloodpeakpredictionsacrossover1000catchmentsingreatbritain AT twagener benchmarkingthepredictivecapabilityofhydrologicalmodelsforriverflowandfloodpeakpredictionsacrossover1000catchmentsingreatbritain AT twagener benchmarkingthepredictivecapabilityofhydrologicalmodelsforriverflowandfloodpeakpredictionsacrossover1000catchmentsingreatbritain AT pjjohnes benchmarkingthepredictivecapabilityofhydrologicalmodelsforriverflowandfloodpeakpredictionsacrossover1000catchmentsingreatbritain AT pjjohnes benchmarkingthepredictivecapabilityofhydrologicalmodelsforriverflowandfloodpeakpredictionsacrossover1000catchmentsingreatbritain AT jpbloomfield benchmarkingthepredictivecapabilityofhydrologicalmodelsforriverflowandfloodpeakpredictionsacrossover1000catchmentsingreatbritain AT sgreene benchmarkingthepredictivecapabilityofhydrologicalmodelsforriverflowandfloodpeakpredictionsacrossover1000catchmentsingreatbritain AT cjamacleod benchmarkingthepredictivecapabilityofhydrologicalmodelsforriverflowandfloodpeakpredictionsacrossover1000catchmentsingreatbritain AT smreaney benchmarkingthepredictivecapabilityofhydrologicalmodelsforriverflowandfloodpeakpredictionsacrossover1000catchmentsingreatbritain |