Exploring the Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment: Conversational Implicature or Nested Sets?
<p>Why do participants commit the conjunction fallacy, for instance by judging it more probable that Linda is a feminist bank teller than a bank teller? The conversational-implicature hypothesis (CIH) suggests that “bank teller” is interpreted as “non-feminist bank teller”. The nested-sets hyp...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
European Federation of Psychology Students' Associations
2019-04-01
|
| Series: | Journal of European Psychology Students |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jeps.efpsa.org/articles/464 |