Education and training of clinical and translational study investigators and research coordinators: A competency-based approach

Introduction Training for the clinical research workforce does not sufficiently prepare workers for today’s scientific complexity; deficiencies may be ameliorated with training. The Enhancing Clinical Research Professionals’ Training and Qualifications dev...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nancy A. Calvin-Naylor, Carolynn Thomas Jones, Michelle M. Wartak, Karen Blackwell, Jonathan M. Davis, Ruthvick Divecha, Edward F. Ellerbeck, Karl Kieburtz, Margaret J. Koziel, Katherine Luzuriaga, Jennifer Maddox, Nancy A. Needler, Susan Murphy, Kieran Pemberton, Catherine Radovich, Eric P. Rubinstein, Harry P. Selker, Pamela Tenaerts, Kelly Unsworth, Kay Wilson, Jonelle E. Wright, Richard Barohn, Thomas P. Shanley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2017-02-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866116000029/type/journal_article
Description
Summary:Introduction Training for the clinical research workforce does not sufficiently prepare workers for today’s scientific complexity; deficiencies may be ameliorated with training. The Enhancing Clinical Research Professionals’ Training and Qualifications developed competency standards for principal investigators and clinical research coordinators. Methods Clinical and Translational Science Awards representatives refined competency statements. Working groups developed assessments, identified training, and highlighted gaps. Results Forty-eight competency statements in 8 domains were developed. Conclusions Training is primarily investigator focused with few programs for clinical research coordinators. Lack of training is felt in new technologies and data management. There are no standardized assessments of competence.
ISSN:2059-8661