All About the Interface: Do Residual Contaminants at A High‐Quality h‐BN Monolayer Perylene Diimide Interface Cause Charge Trapping?

Abstract Intrinsic charge transport in molecularly thin organic semiconducting crystals is critically sensitive to the quality of the interfaces required to perform the electrical measurements. Most prominent are the dielectric–semiconductor and semiconductor–metal interface. While impacts from the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lukas Renn, Lisa S. Walter, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, R. Thomas Weitz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley-VCH 2022-04-01
Series:Advanced Materials Interfaces
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202101701
_version_ 1797690177917812736
author Lukas Renn
Lisa S. Walter
Kenji Watanabe
Takashi Taniguchi
R. Thomas Weitz
author_facet Lukas Renn
Lisa S. Walter
Kenji Watanabe
Takashi Taniguchi
R. Thomas Weitz
author_sort Lukas Renn
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Intrinsic charge transport in molecularly thin organic semiconducting crystals is critically sensitive to the quality of the interfaces required to perform the electrical measurements. Most prominent are the dielectric–semiconductor and semiconductor–metal interface. While impacts from the latter on charge transport can be extracted by four‐terminal measurements, the impact of the dielectric interface can only be minimized, typically by utilizing inert dielectrics. Here, it is shown that charge transport in organic field‐effect transistors based on the n‐type small molecule N, N′‐di((S)‐1‐methylpentyl)‐1,7(6)‐dicyano‐perylene‐3,4:9,10‐bis(dicarboximide) (PDI1MPCN2) can be improved up to one order of magnitude by using hexagonal boron nitride (h‐BN) as dielectric, compared to a standard SiO2 substrate. Using temperature‐dependent electrical measurements, the charge‐transport properties of devices are systematically analyzed, and high four‐terminal mobilities of up to 5.0 cm2 V−1 s−1 are obtained. The high mobility likely stems from decreased charge‐carrier trapping at the semiconductor‐dielectric interface due to the smooth surface of the inert h‐BN. Nevertheless, the temperature dependencies of the mobility, threshold voltage, and interface‐state trap density suggest that charge‐carrier trapping at the dielectric‐semiconductor interface still exists. By comparing the data to transport studies performed on thin air‐gapped organic films, it is concluded that an interfacial layer (likely water or solvent residues) between h‐BN and the monolayer PDI1MPCN2 causes charge trapping.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T01:56:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0b24e4a7b6b64acd8c8dc386fda141ea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2196-7350
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T01:56:48Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Wiley-VCH
record_format Article
series Advanced Materials Interfaces
spelling doaj.art-0b24e4a7b6b64acd8c8dc386fda141ea2023-09-08T03:32:46ZengWiley-VCHAdvanced Materials Interfaces2196-73502022-04-01910n/an/a10.1002/admi.202101701All About the Interface: Do Residual Contaminants at A High‐Quality h‐BN Monolayer Perylene Diimide Interface Cause Charge Trapping?Lukas Renn0Lisa S. Walter1Kenji Watanabe2Takashi Taniguchi3R. Thomas Weitz41st Institute of Physics Faculty of Physics Georg‐August‐University Göttingen Germany1st Institute of Physics Faculty of Physics Georg‐August‐University Göttingen GermanyResearch Center for Functional Materials National Institute for Materials Science 1‐1 Namiki Tsukuba 305‐0044 JapanInternational Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics National Institute for Materials Science 1‐1 Namiki Tsukuba 305‐0044 Japan1st Institute of Physics Faculty of Physics Georg‐August‐University Göttingen GermanyAbstract Intrinsic charge transport in molecularly thin organic semiconducting crystals is critically sensitive to the quality of the interfaces required to perform the electrical measurements. Most prominent are the dielectric–semiconductor and semiconductor–metal interface. While impacts from the latter on charge transport can be extracted by four‐terminal measurements, the impact of the dielectric interface can only be minimized, typically by utilizing inert dielectrics. Here, it is shown that charge transport in organic field‐effect transistors based on the n‐type small molecule N, N′‐di((S)‐1‐methylpentyl)‐1,7(6)‐dicyano‐perylene‐3,4:9,10‐bis(dicarboximide) (PDI1MPCN2) can be improved up to one order of magnitude by using hexagonal boron nitride (h‐BN) as dielectric, compared to a standard SiO2 substrate. Using temperature‐dependent electrical measurements, the charge‐transport properties of devices are systematically analyzed, and high four‐terminal mobilities of up to 5.0 cm2 V−1 s−1 are obtained. The high mobility likely stems from decreased charge‐carrier trapping at the semiconductor‐dielectric interface due to the smooth surface of the inert h‐BN. Nevertheless, the temperature dependencies of the mobility, threshold voltage, and interface‐state trap density suggest that charge‐carrier trapping at the dielectric‐semiconductor interface still exists. By comparing the data to transport studies performed on thin air‐gapped organic films, it is concluded that an interfacial layer (likely water or solvent residues) between h‐BN and the monolayer PDI1MPCN2 causes charge trapping.https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202101701charge transportfield‐effect transistorinterfaceorganic semiconductorvan‐der‐Waals
spellingShingle Lukas Renn
Lisa S. Walter
Kenji Watanabe
Takashi Taniguchi
R. Thomas Weitz
All About the Interface: Do Residual Contaminants at A High‐Quality h‐BN Monolayer Perylene Diimide Interface Cause Charge Trapping?
Advanced Materials Interfaces
charge transport
field‐effect transistor
interface
organic semiconductor
van‐der‐Waals
title All About the Interface: Do Residual Contaminants at A High‐Quality h‐BN Monolayer Perylene Diimide Interface Cause Charge Trapping?
title_full All About the Interface: Do Residual Contaminants at A High‐Quality h‐BN Monolayer Perylene Diimide Interface Cause Charge Trapping?
title_fullStr All About the Interface: Do Residual Contaminants at A High‐Quality h‐BN Monolayer Perylene Diimide Interface Cause Charge Trapping?
title_full_unstemmed All About the Interface: Do Residual Contaminants at A High‐Quality h‐BN Monolayer Perylene Diimide Interface Cause Charge Trapping?
title_short All About the Interface: Do Residual Contaminants at A High‐Quality h‐BN Monolayer Perylene Diimide Interface Cause Charge Trapping?
title_sort all about the interface do residual contaminants at a high quality h bn monolayer perylene diimide interface cause charge trapping
topic charge transport
field‐effect transistor
interface
organic semiconductor
van‐der‐Waals
url https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202101701
work_keys_str_mv AT lukasrenn allabouttheinterfacedoresidualcontaminantsatahighqualityhbnmonolayerperylenediimideinterfacecausechargetrapping
AT lisaswalter allabouttheinterfacedoresidualcontaminantsatahighqualityhbnmonolayerperylenediimideinterfacecausechargetrapping
AT kenjiwatanabe allabouttheinterfacedoresidualcontaminantsatahighqualityhbnmonolayerperylenediimideinterfacecausechargetrapping
AT takashitaniguchi allabouttheinterfacedoresidualcontaminantsatahighqualityhbnmonolayerperylenediimideinterfacecausechargetrapping
AT rthomasweitz allabouttheinterfacedoresidualcontaminantsatahighqualityhbnmonolayerperylenediimideinterfacecausechargetrapping