Does it make sense to talk about a “Third Wittgenstein” following 1946?
According to Danièle Moyal-Sharrock and Avrum Stroll, there are compelling reasons for talking about a “third Wittgenstein” whose corpus would be made up of all the works written by the Viennese philosopher following 1946, including the second part of his Philosophical Investigations. The main reaso...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
2012-12-01
|
| Series: | Logos |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ASEM/article/view/40414 |