Active recovery is better than passive recovery to optimizing post-exercise body recovery
One of the efforts to prevent the overreaching condition is by doing a recovery phase after exercise. The quality and quantity of recovery influence the effectiveness of recovery. The effectiveness of recovery can be observed by heart rate and body temperature after recovery. This study aims to comp...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Indonesian |
| Published: |
Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri
2022-04-01
|
| Series: | Jurnal Sportif |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ojs.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/pjk/article/view/17685 |
| _version_ | 1818199854042578944 |
|---|---|
| author | Laily Mita Andriana Luh Putu Ratna Sundari I Made Muliarta Kunjung Ashadi Arif Rahman Nurdianto |
| author_facet | Laily Mita Andriana Luh Putu Ratna Sundari I Made Muliarta Kunjung Ashadi Arif Rahman Nurdianto |
| author_sort | Laily Mita Andriana |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | One of the efforts to prevent the overreaching condition is by doing a recovery phase after exercise. The quality and quantity of recovery influence the effectiveness of recovery. The effectiveness of recovery can be observed by heart rate and body temperature after recovery. This study aims to compare active recovery and passive recovery after moderate-intensity continuous training on heart rate and body temperature. The research method used is quasi-experimental and uses a two-group pre and post-test design. Based on the Pocock formula, the research subjects used were 40 women aged 24 years to 35 years. The data collected include heart rate and body temperature. The data analysis techniques used were normality test, treatment effect test (paired sample t-test), and difference test (independent samples t-test). The results showed that active recovery was better than passive recovery to optimizing post-exercise heart rate (p<0.05). Active recovery was better than passive recovery in optimizing body temperature (p<0.05). It was concluded that active recovery after moderate-intensity continuous training was better than passive recovery to optimize post-exercise recovery and prevent overreaching. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T02:28:22Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-0d1730792fb34101ae787437ed98b7e7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2548-7833 2477-3379 |
| language | Indonesian |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T02:28:22Z |
| publishDate | 2022-04-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Jurnal Sportif |
| spelling | doaj.art-0d1730792fb34101ae787437ed98b7e72022-12-22T00:41:29ZindUniversitas Nusantara PGRI KediriJurnal Sportif2548-78332477-33792022-04-0181598010.29407/js_unpgri.v8i1.1768517685Active recovery is better than passive recovery to optimizing post-exercise body recoveryLaily Mita Andriana0Luh Putu Ratna Sundari1I Made Muliarta2Kunjung Ashadi3Arif Rahman Nurdianto4082245353268Universitas UdayanaUniversitas UdayanaUniversitas Negeri SurabayaUniversitas AirlanggaOne of the efforts to prevent the overreaching condition is by doing a recovery phase after exercise. The quality and quantity of recovery influence the effectiveness of recovery. The effectiveness of recovery can be observed by heart rate and body temperature after recovery. This study aims to compare active recovery and passive recovery after moderate-intensity continuous training on heart rate and body temperature. The research method used is quasi-experimental and uses a two-group pre and post-test design. Based on the Pocock formula, the research subjects used were 40 women aged 24 years to 35 years. The data collected include heart rate and body temperature. The data analysis techniques used were normality test, treatment effect test (paired sample t-test), and difference test (independent samples t-test). The results showed that active recovery was better than passive recovery to optimizing post-exercise heart rate (p<0.05). Active recovery was better than passive recovery in optimizing body temperature (p<0.05). It was concluded that active recovery after moderate-intensity continuous training was better than passive recovery to optimize post-exercise recovery and prevent overreaching.https://ojs.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/pjk/article/view/17685active recoverybody temperatureheart ratemoderate-intensity continuous trainingpassive recovery |
| spellingShingle | Laily Mita Andriana Luh Putu Ratna Sundari I Made Muliarta Kunjung Ashadi Arif Rahman Nurdianto Active recovery is better than passive recovery to optimizing post-exercise body recovery Jurnal Sportif active recovery body temperature heart rate moderate-intensity continuous training passive recovery |
| title | Active recovery is better than passive recovery to optimizing post-exercise body recovery |
| title_full | Active recovery is better than passive recovery to optimizing post-exercise body recovery |
| title_fullStr | Active recovery is better than passive recovery to optimizing post-exercise body recovery |
| title_full_unstemmed | Active recovery is better than passive recovery to optimizing post-exercise body recovery |
| title_short | Active recovery is better than passive recovery to optimizing post-exercise body recovery |
| title_sort | active recovery is better than passive recovery to optimizing post exercise body recovery |
| topic | active recovery body temperature heart rate moderate-intensity continuous training passive recovery |
| url | https://ojs.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/pjk/article/view/17685 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lailymitaandriana activerecoveryisbetterthanpassiverecoverytooptimizingpostexercisebodyrecovery AT luhputuratnasundari activerecoveryisbetterthanpassiverecoverytooptimizingpostexercisebodyrecovery AT imademuliarta activerecoveryisbetterthanpassiverecoverytooptimizingpostexercisebodyrecovery AT kunjungashadi activerecoveryisbetterthanpassiverecoverytooptimizingpostexercisebodyrecovery AT arifrahmannurdianto activerecoveryisbetterthanpassiverecoverytooptimizingpostexercisebodyrecovery |