Revisiting verbs of emission: an update on some relevant theoretical accounts of lexical specification and argument structure of emission verbs
The paper addresses the question of what semantic properties lexicalized in verbs determine their syntactic behavior in intransitive motion events and in resultative constructions in English and Serbian. Special attention is devoted to English and...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Montenegro
2016-06-01
|
Series: | Logos et Littera: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Text |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ll.ac.me/treci%20broj/Milivojevic%2025-44.pdf |
Summary: | The paper addresses the question of what semantic
properties lexicalized in verbs determine their syntactic behavior in intransitive
motion events and in resultative constructions in English and Serbian. Special
attention is devoted
to English and Serbian verbs of emission (specifically verbs
of sound emission and partly also verbs of light, smell and substance emission)
regarding their potential to surface as main verbs in these constructions and to
combine with directional phrases
within specific morphosyntactic templates
(unaccusatives and unergatives). The presented research promotes a theoretical
view according to which the established syntactic patterns can be applied across
the whole class of verbs of emission to express a full
er range of atypical verb
meanings in motion events. Theoretical conclusions of the research are also
relevant for a wider theoretical description of motion events and resultatives in a
cross
-
linguistic perspective. The paper puts forth additional implica
tions
regarding the projectionalist approach to semantic verb classes against the
theoretical framework of Beth Levin (1993). Finally, the paper considers the
relevant points of structurally realized similarities via relevant constructional
templates in En
glish and in Serbian, as well as some important points of
morphosyntactic divergence between the two languages. The conclusions
presented aim at a more comprehensive contrastive language typology based on
language “framing” parameters. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2336-9884 2336-9884 |