An Epistemological Approach to Argumentation

The evaluation of arguments and argumentation is best understood epistemologically. Epistemic circularity is not formally defective but it may be epistemologically objectionable. Sorenson's doubts about the syntactic approach to circularity are endorsed with qualifications. One explanation of a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alvin I. Goldman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2004-01-01
Series:Informal Logic
Subjects:
Online Access:https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2153