Opportunity, job pressure and deviant workplace behaviour: does neutralisation mediate the relationship? A study of faculty members in public universities in Nigeria

Purpose – The purpose of the present study was twofold: (1) to examine the direct effect of the dimensions of opportunity (i.e. ethical climate and institutional policy) and dimensions of job pressure (i.e. workload and work pressure) on workplace deviance (i.e. organisational and interpersonal devi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Olalekan Adeoti, Faridahwati Mohd Shamsudin, AlHamwan Mousa Mohammad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Publishing 2021-05-01
Series:European Journal of Management and Business Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EJMBE-08-2017-0002/full/pdf
_version_ 1827912722875940864
author Michael Olalekan Adeoti
Faridahwati Mohd Shamsudin
AlHamwan Mousa Mohammad
author_facet Michael Olalekan Adeoti
Faridahwati Mohd Shamsudin
AlHamwan Mousa Mohammad
author_sort Michael Olalekan Adeoti
collection DOAJ
description Purpose – The purpose of the present study was twofold: (1) to examine the direct effect of the dimensions of opportunity (i.e. ethical climate and institutional policy) and dimensions of job pressure (i.e. workload and work pressure) on workplace deviance (i.e. organisational and interpersonal deviance) and (2) to assess the mediation of neutralisation in the relationship between the dimensions of opportunity, job pressure and workplace deviance. Design/methodology/approach – The present study drew from the fraud triangle theory (FTT; Cressey, 1950) and the theory of neutralisation (Sykes and Matza, 1957) to achieve the research objectives. Survey data from 356 full-time faculty members in Nigerian public universities were collected. Partial least square-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was employed to analyse the data. Findings – The results indicated that opportunity and job pressure significantly affected workplace deviance. As expected, neutralisation was found to mediate the negative relationship between ethical climate and interpersonal deviance and the positive relationship between workload, work pressure and interpersonal deviance. Contrary to expectation, neutralisation did not mediate the relationship between opportunity, pressure and organisational deviance. Research limitations/implications – The sample was drawn from academics in public universities and the cross-sectional nature of this study means that the findings have limited generalisations. Practical implications – This study offers insights into the management of Nigerian public universities on the need to curb workplace deviance amongst faculty members. This study recommends that the management improve the work environment by enhancing the ethical climate and institutional policies and reviewing the existing workload that may constitute pressure to the faculty members. Originality/value – The present study provides empirical support for the fraud triangle theory and theory of neutralisation to explain workplace deviance.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T02:19:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1115eed4b5a440438d4ae6dc2a932318
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2444-8451
2444-8494
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T02:19:39Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher Emerald Publishing
record_format Article
series European Journal of Management and Business Economics
spelling doaj.art-1115eed4b5a440438d4ae6dc2a9323182023-06-30T10:08:24ZengEmerald PublishingEuropean Journal of Management and Business Economics2444-84512444-84942021-05-0130217019010.1108/EJMBE-08-2017-0002Opportunity, job pressure and deviant workplace behaviour: does neutralisation mediate the relationship? A study of faculty members in public universities in NigeriaMichael Olalekan Adeoti0Faridahwati Mohd Shamsudin1AlHamwan Mousa Mohammad2Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, MalaysiaOthman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, MalaysiaSchool of Business Management, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, MalaysiaPurpose – The purpose of the present study was twofold: (1) to examine the direct effect of the dimensions of opportunity (i.e. ethical climate and institutional policy) and dimensions of job pressure (i.e. workload and work pressure) on workplace deviance (i.e. organisational and interpersonal deviance) and (2) to assess the mediation of neutralisation in the relationship between the dimensions of opportunity, job pressure and workplace deviance. Design/methodology/approach – The present study drew from the fraud triangle theory (FTT; Cressey, 1950) and the theory of neutralisation (Sykes and Matza, 1957) to achieve the research objectives. Survey data from 356 full-time faculty members in Nigerian public universities were collected. Partial least square-structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) was employed to analyse the data. Findings – The results indicated that opportunity and job pressure significantly affected workplace deviance. As expected, neutralisation was found to mediate the negative relationship between ethical climate and interpersonal deviance and the positive relationship between workload, work pressure and interpersonal deviance. Contrary to expectation, neutralisation did not mediate the relationship between opportunity, pressure and organisational deviance. Research limitations/implications – The sample was drawn from academics in public universities and the cross-sectional nature of this study means that the findings have limited generalisations. Practical implications – This study offers insights into the management of Nigerian public universities on the need to curb workplace deviance amongst faculty members. This study recommends that the management improve the work environment by enhancing the ethical climate and institutional policies and reviewing the existing workload that may constitute pressure to the faculty members. Originality/value – The present study provides empirical support for the fraud triangle theory and theory of neutralisation to explain workplace deviance.https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EJMBE-08-2017-0002/full/pdfNeutralisationOpportunityJob pressureWorkplace deviance
spellingShingle Michael Olalekan Adeoti
Faridahwati Mohd Shamsudin
AlHamwan Mousa Mohammad
Opportunity, job pressure and deviant workplace behaviour: does neutralisation mediate the relationship? A study of faculty members in public universities in Nigeria
European Journal of Management and Business Economics
Neutralisation
Opportunity
Job pressure
Workplace deviance
title Opportunity, job pressure and deviant workplace behaviour: does neutralisation mediate the relationship? A study of faculty members in public universities in Nigeria
title_full Opportunity, job pressure and deviant workplace behaviour: does neutralisation mediate the relationship? A study of faculty members in public universities in Nigeria
title_fullStr Opportunity, job pressure and deviant workplace behaviour: does neutralisation mediate the relationship? A study of faculty members in public universities in Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Opportunity, job pressure and deviant workplace behaviour: does neutralisation mediate the relationship? A study of faculty members in public universities in Nigeria
title_short Opportunity, job pressure and deviant workplace behaviour: does neutralisation mediate the relationship? A study of faculty members in public universities in Nigeria
title_sort opportunity job pressure and deviant workplace behaviour does neutralisation mediate the relationship a study of faculty members in public universities in nigeria
topic Neutralisation
Opportunity
Job pressure
Workplace deviance
url https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EJMBE-08-2017-0002/full/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelolalekanadeoti opportunityjobpressureanddeviantworkplacebehaviourdoesneutralisationmediatetherelationshipastudyoffacultymembersinpublicuniversitiesinnigeria
AT faridahwatimohdshamsudin opportunityjobpressureanddeviantworkplacebehaviourdoesneutralisationmediatetherelationshipastudyoffacultymembersinpublicuniversitiesinnigeria
AT alhamwanmousamohammad opportunityjobpressureanddeviantworkplacebehaviourdoesneutralisationmediatetherelationshipastudyoffacultymembersinpublicuniversitiesinnigeria