Examining learning coherence in group decision-making: triads vs. tetrads

Abstract This study examined whether three heads are better than four in terms of performance and learning properties in group decision-making. It was predicted that learning incoherence took place in tetrads because the majority rule could not be applied when two subgroups emerged. As a result, tet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tsutomu Harada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2021-10-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00089-w