Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 61–85-year-old adults: the CADENCE-Adults study

Abstract Background Heuristic (i.e., evidence-based, rounded) cadences of ≥100 and ≥ 130 steps/min have consistently corresponded with absolutely-defined moderate (3 metabolic equivalents [METs]) and vigorous (6 METs) physical activity intensity, respectively, in adults 21–60 years of age. There is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Catrine Tudor-Locke, Jose Mora-Gonzalez, Scott W. Ducharme, Elroy J. Aguiar, John M. Schuna, Tiago V. Barreira, Christopher C. Moore, Colleen J. Chase, Zachary R. Gould, Marcos A. Amalbert-Birriel, Stuart R. Chipkin, John Staudenmayer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-09-01
Series:International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01199-4
_version_ 1830477877364129792
author Catrine Tudor-Locke
Jose Mora-Gonzalez
Scott W. Ducharme
Elroy J. Aguiar
John M. Schuna
Tiago V. Barreira
Christopher C. Moore
Colleen J. Chase
Zachary R. Gould
Marcos A. Amalbert-Birriel
Stuart R. Chipkin
John Staudenmayer
author_facet Catrine Tudor-Locke
Jose Mora-Gonzalez
Scott W. Ducharme
Elroy J. Aguiar
John M. Schuna
Tiago V. Barreira
Christopher C. Moore
Colleen J. Chase
Zachary R. Gould
Marcos A. Amalbert-Birriel
Stuart R. Chipkin
John Staudenmayer
author_sort Catrine Tudor-Locke
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Heuristic (i.e., evidence-based, rounded) cadences of ≥100 and ≥ 130 steps/min have consistently corresponded with absolutely-defined moderate (3 metabolic equivalents [METs]) and vigorous (6 METs) physical activity intensity, respectively, in adults 21–60 years of age. There is no consensus regarding similar thresholds in older adults. Purpose To provide heuristic cadence thresholds for 3, 4, 5, and 6 METs in 61–85-year-old adults. Methods Ninety-eight community-dwelling ambulatory and ostensibly healthy older adults (age = 72.6 ± 6.9 years; 49% women) walked on a treadmill for a series of 5-min bouts (beginning at 0.5 mph with 0.5 mph increments) in this laboratory-based cross-sectional study until: 1) transitioning to running, 2) reaching ≥75% of their age-predicted maximum heart rate, or 3) reporting a Borg rating of perceived exertion > 13. Cadence was directly observed and hand-tallied. Intensity (oxygen uptake [VO2] mL/kg/min) was assessed with indirect calorimetry and converted to METs (1 MET = 3.5 mL/kg/min). Cadence thresholds were identified via segmented mixed effects model regression and using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Final heuristic cadence thresholds represented an analytical compromise based on classification accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and overall accuracy). Results Cadences of 103.1 (95% Prediction Interval: 70.0–114.2), 116.4 (105.3–127.4), 129.6 (118.6–140.7), and 142.9 steps/min (131.8–148.4) were identified for 3, 4, 5, and 6 METs, respectively, based on the segmented regression. Comparable values based on ROC analysis were 100.3 (95% Confidence Intervals: 95.7–103.1), 111.5 (106.1–112.9), 116.0 (112.4–120.2), and 128.6 steps/min (128.3–136.4). Heuristic cadence thresholds of 100, 110, and 120 were associated with 3, 4, and 5 METs. Data to inform a threshold for ≥6 METs was limited, as only 6/98 (6.0%) participants achieved this intensity. Conclusions Consistent with previous data collected from 21–40 and 41–60-year-old adults, heuristic cadence thresholds of 100, 110, and 120 steps/min were associated with 3, 4, and 5 METs, respectively, in 61–85-year-old adults. Most older adults tested did not achieve the intensity of ≥6 METs; therefore, our data do not support establishing thresholds corresponding with this intensity level. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02650258 . Registered 24 December 2015.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T16:22:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-154295d801f84fb58f7b369c9b934d97
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1479-5868
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T16:22:01Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
spelling doaj.art-154295d801f84fb58f7b369c9b934d972022-12-21T18:57:33ZengBMCInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity1479-58682021-09-0118111210.1186/s12966-021-01199-4Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 61–85-year-old adults: the CADENCE-Adults studyCatrine Tudor-Locke0Jose Mora-Gonzalez1Scott W. Ducharme2Elroy J. Aguiar3John M. Schuna4Tiago V. Barreira5Christopher C. Moore6Colleen J. Chase7Zachary R. Gould8Marcos A. Amalbert-Birriel9Stuart R. Chipkin10John Staudenmayer11College of Health and Human Services, University of North Carolina at CharlotteCollege of Health and Human Services, University of North Carolina at CharlotteDepartment of Kinesiology, California State UniversityDepartment of Kinesiology, The University of AlabamaSchool of Biological and Population Health Sciences, Oregon State UniversityExercise Science Department, Syracuse UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts AmherstDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts AmherstDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts AmherstDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts AmherstDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts AmherstAbstract Background Heuristic (i.e., evidence-based, rounded) cadences of ≥100 and ≥ 130 steps/min have consistently corresponded with absolutely-defined moderate (3 metabolic equivalents [METs]) and vigorous (6 METs) physical activity intensity, respectively, in adults 21–60 years of age. There is no consensus regarding similar thresholds in older adults. Purpose To provide heuristic cadence thresholds for 3, 4, 5, and 6 METs in 61–85-year-old adults. Methods Ninety-eight community-dwelling ambulatory and ostensibly healthy older adults (age = 72.6 ± 6.9 years; 49% women) walked on a treadmill for a series of 5-min bouts (beginning at 0.5 mph with 0.5 mph increments) in this laboratory-based cross-sectional study until: 1) transitioning to running, 2) reaching ≥75% of their age-predicted maximum heart rate, or 3) reporting a Borg rating of perceived exertion > 13. Cadence was directly observed and hand-tallied. Intensity (oxygen uptake [VO2] mL/kg/min) was assessed with indirect calorimetry and converted to METs (1 MET = 3.5 mL/kg/min). Cadence thresholds were identified via segmented mixed effects model regression and using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Final heuristic cadence thresholds represented an analytical compromise based on classification accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and overall accuracy). Results Cadences of 103.1 (95% Prediction Interval: 70.0–114.2), 116.4 (105.3–127.4), 129.6 (118.6–140.7), and 142.9 steps/min (131.8–148.4) were identified for 3, 4, 5, and 6 METs, respectively, based on the segmented regression. Comparable values based on ROC analysis were 100.3 (95% Confidence Intervals: 95.7–103.1), 111.5 (106.1–112.9), 116.0 (112.4–120.2), and 128.6 steps/min (128.3–136.4). Heuristic cadence thresholds of 100, 110, and 120 were associated with 3, 4, and 5 METs. Data to inform a threshold for ≥6 METs was limited, as only 6/98 (6.0%) participants achieved this intensity. Conclusions Consistent with previous data collected from 21–40 and 41–60-year-old adults, heuristic cadence thresholds of 100, 110, and 120 steps/min were associated with 3, 4, and 5 METs, respectively, in 61–85-year-old adults. Most older adults tested did not achieve the intensity of ≥6 METs; therefore, our data do not support establishing thresholds corresponding with this intensity level. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02650258 . Registered 24 December 2015.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01199-4AccelerometerExercisePedometerPhysical activityStep rate
spellingShingle Catrine Tudor-Locke
Jose Mora-Gonzalez
Scott W. Ducharme
Elroy J. Aguiar
John M. Schuna
Tiago V. Barreira
Christopher C. Moore
Colleen J. Chase
Zachary R. Gould
Marcos A. Amalbert-Birriel
Stuart R. Chipkin
John Staudenmayer
Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 61–85-year-old adults: the CADENCE-Adults study
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Accelerometer
Exercise
Pedometer
Physical activity
Step rate
title Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 61–85-year-old adults: the CADENCE-Adults study
title_full Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 61–85-year-old adults: the CADENCE-Adults study
title_fullStr Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 61–85-year-old adults: the CADENCE-Adults study
title_full_unstemmed Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 61–85-year-old adults: the CADENCE-Adults study
title_short Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 61–85-year-old adults: the CADENCE-Adults study
title_sort walking cadence steps min and intensity in 61 85 year old adults the cadence adults study
topic Accelerometer
Exercise
Pedometer
Physical activity
Step rate
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01199-4
work_keys_str_mv AT catrinetudorlocke walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT josemoragonzalez walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT scottwducharme walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT elroyjaguiar walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT johnmschuna walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT tiagovbarreira walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT christophercmoore walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT colleenjchase walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT zacharyrgould walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT marcosaamalbertbirriel walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT stuartrchipkin walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy
AT johnstaudenmayer walkingcadencestepsminandintensityin6185yearoldadultsthecadenceadultsstudy