Support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanics
Abstract Successful object interaction during daily living involves maintaining the grasped object in static equilibrium by properly arranging the fingertip contact forces. According to the mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping, during torque production tasks, fingers with longer moment arms w...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2022-06-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14014-2 |
| _version_ | 1818236804153737216 |
|---|---|
| author | Banuvathy Rajakumar Swarnab Dutta S. K. M. Varadhan |
| author_facet | Banuvathy Rajakumar Swarnab Dutta S. K. M. Varadhan |
| author_sort | Banuvathy Rajakumar |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Successful object interaction during daily living involves maintaining the grasped object in static equilibrium by properly arranging the fingertip contact forces. According to the mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping, during torque production tasks, fingers with longer moment arms would produce greater normal force than those with shorter moment arms. Previous studies have probed this hypothesis by investigating the force contributions of individual fingers through systematic variations (or perturbations) of the properties of the grasped handle. In the current study, we examined the validity of this hypothesis in a paradigm wherein the thumb tangential force was constrained to a minimal constant magnitude. This was achieved by placing the thumb on a freely movable slider platform. The total mass of the handle was systematically varied by adding external loads directly below the center of mass of the handle. Our findings suggest that the mechanical advantage hypothesis manifests only during the heaviest loading condition when a threshold difficulty is reached. We infer that the support for the mechanical advantage hypothesis depends not only on the physical parameters but also on the individual ability to manage the task. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T12:15:41Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-15f202ca18464224bcb7ce5afbd6b7eb |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2045-2322 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T12:15:41Z |
| publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
| publisher | Nature Portfolio |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Scientific Reports |
| spelling | doaj.art-15f202ca18464224bcb7ce5afbd6b7eb2022-12-22T00:24:46ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-06-0112111010.1038/s41598-022-14014-2Support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanicsBanuvathy Rajakumar0Swarnab Dutta1S. K. M. Varadhan2Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Tamil NaduDepartment of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Tamil NaduDepartment of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Tamil NaduAbstract Successful object interaction during daily living involves maintaining the grasped object in static equilibrium by properly arranging the fingertip contact forces. According to the mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping, during torque production tasks, fingers with longer moment arms would produce greater normal force than those with shorter moment arms. Previous studies have probed this hypothesis by investigating the force contributions of individual fingers through systematic variations (or perturbations) of the properties of the grasped handle. In the current study, we examined the validity of this hypothesis in a paradigm wherein the thumb tangential force was constrained to a minimal constant magnitude. This was achieved by placing the thumb on a freely movable slider platform. The total mass of the handle was systematically varied by adding external loads directly below the center of mass of the handle. Our findings suggest that the mechanical advantage hypothesis manifests only during the heaviest loading condition when a threshold difficulty is reached. We infer that the support for the mechanical advantage hypothesis depends not only on the physical parameters but also on the individual ability to manage the task.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14014-2 |
| spellingShingle | Banuvathy Rajakumar Swarnab Dutta S. K. M. Varadhan Support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanics Scientific Reports |
| title | Support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanics |
| title_full | Support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanics |
| title_fullStr | Support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanics |
| title_full_unstemmed | Support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanics |
| title_short | Support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanics |
| title_sort | support for mechanical advantage hypothesis of grasping cannot be explained only by task mechanics |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14014-2 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT banuvathyrajakumar supportformechanicaladvantagehypothesisofgraspingcannotbeexplainedonlybytaskmechanics AT swarnabdutta supportformechanicaladvantagehypothesisofgraspingcannotbeexplainedonlybytaskmechanics AT skmvaradhan supportformechanicaladvantagehypothesisofgraspingcannotbeexplainedonlybytaskmechanics |