Valve‐in‐Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Valve‐in‐Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Background In the absence of randomized controlled trials, reports from nonrandomized studies comparing valve‐in‐valve implantation (ViV) to redo surgical aortic valve replacement (rAVR) have shown inconsistent results. Methods and Results PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and CENTRAL (Cochrane Centra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthias Raschpichler, Suzanne de Waha, David Holzhey, Guido Schwarzer, Nir Flint, Danon Kaewkes, Paul T. Bräuchle, Danny Dvir, Raj Makkar, Gorav Ailawadi, Mohamed Abdel‐Wahab, Holger Thiele, Michael A. Borger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
aortic stenosis
failed surgical aortic bioprosthesis
redo surgical aortic valve replacement, valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.024848

Internet

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.024848

Similar Items