How Scaffolds shape MAPK signalling: What we know and opportunities for systems approaches

Scaffolding proteins add a new layer of complexity to the dynamics of cell signalling. Above their basic function to bring several components of a signalling pathway together, recent experimental research has found that scaffolds influence signalling in a much more complex way: Scaffolds can exert s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Franziska eWitzel, Louise E. Maddison, Nils eBlüthgen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphys.2012.00475/full
_version_ 1818958918383042560
author Franziska eWitzel
Franziska eWitzel
Louise E. Maddison
Nils eBlüthgen
Nils eBlüthgen
author_facet Franziska eWitzel
Franziska eWitzel
Louise E. Maddison
Nils eBlüthgen
Nils eBlüthgen
author_sort Franziska eWitzel
collection DOAJ
description Scaffolding proteins add a new layer of complexity to the dynamics of cell signalling. Above their basic function to bring several components of a signalling pathway together, recent experimental research has found that scaffolds influence signalling in a much more complex way: Scaffolds can exert some catalytic function, influence signalling by allosteric mechanisms, are feedback-regulated, localise signalling activity to distinct regions of the cell or increase pathway fidelity. Here we review experimental and theoretical approaches that address the function of two MAPK scaffolds, Ste5, a scaffold of the yeast mating pathway and Ksr1/2, a scaffold of the classical mammalian MAPK signalling pathway. For the yeast scaffold Ste5, detailed mechanistic models have been valuable for the understanding of its function. For scaffolds in mammalian signalling, however, models have been rather generic and sketchy. For example, these models predicted narrow optimal scaffold concentrations, but when revisiting these models by assuming typical concentrations, rather a range of scaffold levels optimally supports signalling. Thus, more realistic models are needed to understand the role of scaffolds in mammalian signal transduction, which opens a big opportunity for systems biology.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T11:33:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1717618905ac445789d6f9aec0e6ad4a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-042X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T11:33:23Z
publishDate 2012-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Physiology
spelling doaj.art-1717618905ac445789d6f9aec0e6ad4a2022-12-21T19:42:11ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2012-12-01310.3389/fphys.2012.0047538000How Scaffolds shape MAPK signalling: What we know and opportunities for systems approachesFranziska eWitzel0Franziska eWitzel1Louise E. Maddison2Nils eBlüthgen3Nils eBlüthgen4Humboldt University BerlinCharité-Universitätsmedizin BerlinUniversity of ManchesterHumboldt University BerlinCharité-Universitätsmedizin BerlinScaffolding proteins add a new layer of complexity to the dynamics of cell signalling. Above their basic function to bring several components of a signalling pathway together, recent experimental research has found that scaffolds influence signalling in a much more complex way: Scaffolds can exert some catalytic function, influence signalling by allosteric mechanisms, are feedback-regulated, localise signalling activity to distinct regions of the cell or increase pathway fidelity. Here we review experimental and theoretical approaches that address the function of two MAPK scaffolds, Ste5, a scaffold of the yeast mating pathway and Ksr1/2, a scaffold of the classical mammalian MAPK signalling pathway. For the yeast scaffold Ste5, detailed mechanistic models have been valuable for the understanding of its function. For scaffolds in mammalian signalling, however, models have been rather generic and sketchy. For example, these models predicted narrow optimal scaffold concentrations, but when revisiting these models by assuming typical concentrations, rather a range of scaffold levels optimally supports signalling. Thus, more realistic models are needed to understand the role of scaffolds in mammalian signal transduction, which opens a big opportunity for systems biology.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphys.2012.00475/fullsignallingmathematical modelingUltrasensitivityMAPK and ERK signallingScaffoldSte5
spellingShingle Franziska eWitzel
Franziska eWitzel
Louise E. Maddison
Nils eBlüthgen
Nils eBlüthgen
How Scaffolds shape MAPK signalling: What we know and opportunities for systems approaches
Frontiers in Physiology
signalling
mathematical modeling
Ultrasensitivity
MAPK and ERK signalling
Scaffold
Ste5
title How Scaffolds shape MAPK signalling: What we know and opportunities for systems approaches
title_full How Scaffolds shape MAPK signalling: What we know and opportunities for systems approaches
title_fullStr How Scaffolds shape MAPK signalling: What we know and opportunities for systems approaches
title_full_unstemmed How Scaffolds shape MAPK signalling: What we know and opportunities for systems approaches
title_short How Scaffolds shape MAPK signalling: What we know and opportunities for systems approaches
title_sort how scaffolds shape mapk signalling what we know and opportunities for systems approaches
topic signalling
mathematical modeling
Ultrasensitivity
MAPK and ERK signalling
Scaffold
Ste5
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fphys.2012.00475/full
work_keys_str_mv AT franziskaewitzel howscaffoldsshapemapksignallingwhatweknowandopportunitiesforsystemsapproaches
AT franziskaewitzel howscaffoldsshapemapksignallingwhatweknowandopportunitiesforsystemsapproaches
AT louiseemaddison howscaffoldsshapemapksignallingwhatweknowandopportunitiesforsystemsapproaches
AT nilsebluthgen howscaffoldsshapemapksignallingwhatweknowandopportunitiesforsystemsapproaches
AT nilsebluthgen howscaffoldsshapemapksignallingwhatweknowandopportunitiesforsystemsapproaches