Effect of balance training on static and dynamic balance performance in male adolescents: role of training frequency
Abstract Objective Previous studies reported significant improvements in static and dynamic balance performance following balance training during adolescence. However, it is unclear how equal training volume but different training frequencies per week affect training-induced adaptations. Thus, the p...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2022-12-01
|
| Series: | BMC Research Notes |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06177-y |
| _version_ | 1798005046383738880 |
|---|---|
| author | Thomas Muehlbauer Arne Grundmann Lukas Vortkamp Simon Schedler |
| author_facet | Thomas Muehlbauer Arne Grundmann Lukas Vortkamp Simon Schedler |
| author_sort | Thomas Muehlbauer |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Objective Previous studies reported significant improvements in static and dynamic balance performance following balance training during adolescence. However, it is unclear how equal training volume but different training frequencies per week affect training-induced adaptations. Thus, the present study investigated the effects of balance training frequency (i.e., 2 × 30 min per week or 3 × 20 min per week) on measures of static and dynamic balance in healthy male adolescents. Results Irrespective of balance training frequency, significant pretest to posttest improvements were detected for static (i.e., One-Legged Stance test, standing time duration) and dynamic (i.e., Lower Quarter Y Balance test, reach distance) balance performance. However, no group × test interactions were found. These results imply that balance training is effective to improve static and dynamic balance performance in healthy male adolescents, but the effectiveness seems unaffected by the applied balance training frequency. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T12:34:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-17df1548e21d49509b8bb7d61802fe2d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1756-0500 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T12:34:10Z |
| publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Research Notes |
| spelling | doaj.art-17df1548e21d49509b8bb7d61802fe2d2022-12-22T04:23:41ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002022-12-011511510.1186/s13104-022-06177-yEffect of balance training on static and dynamic balance performance in male adolescents: role of training frequencyThomas Muehlbauer0Arne Grundmann1Lukas Vortkamp2Simon Schedler3Division of Movement and Training Sciences/Biomechanics of Sport, University of Duisburg-EssenDivision of Movement and Training Sciences/Biomechanics of Sport, University of Duisburg-EssenDivision of Movement and Training Sciences/Biomechanics of Sport, University of Duisburg-EssenDivision of Movement and Training Sciences/Biomechanics of Sport, University of Duisburg-EssenAbstract Objective Previous studies reported significant improvements in static and dynamic balance performance following balance training during adolescence. However, it is unclear how equal training volume but different training frequencies per week affect training-induced adaptations. Thus, the present study investigated the effects of balance training frequency (i.e., 2 × 30 min per week or 3 × 20 min per week) on measures of static and dynamic balance in healthy male adolescents. Results Irrespective of balance training frequency, significant pretest to posttest improvements were detected for static (i.e., One-Legged Stance test, standing time duration) and dynamic (i.e., Lower Quarter Y Balance test, reach distance) balance performance. However, no group × test interactions were found. These results imply that balance training is effective to improve static and dynamic balance performance in healthy male adolescents, but the effectiveness seems unaffected by the applied balance training frequency.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06177-yPostural controlAdolescenceDose–response relationship |
| spellingShingle | Thomas Muehlbauer Arne Grundmann Lukas Vortkamp Simon Schedler Effect of balance training on static and dynamic balance performance in male adolescents: role of training frequency BMC Research Notes Postural control Adolescence Dose–response relationship |
| title | Effect of balance training on static and dynamic balance performance in male adolescents: role of training frequency |
| title_full | Effect of balance training on static and dynamic balance performance in male adolescents: role of training frequency |
| title_fullStr | Effect of balance training on static and dynamic balance performance in male adolescents: role of training frequency |
| title_full_unstemmed | Effect of balance training on static and dynamic balance performance in male adolescents: role of training frequency |
| title_short | Effect of balance training on static and dynamic balance performance in male adolescents: role of training frequency |
| title_sort | effect of balance training on static and dynamic balance performance in male adolescents role of training frequency |
| topic | Postural control Adolescence Dose–response relationship |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06177-y |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasmuehlbauer effectofbalancetrainingonstaticanddynamicbalanceperformanceinmaleadolescentsroleoftrainingfrequency AT arnegrundmann effectofbalancetrainingonstaticanddynamicbalanceperformanceinmaleadolescentsroleoftrainingfrequency AT lukasvortkamp effectofbalancetrainingonstaticanddynamicbalanceperformanceinmaleadolescentsroleoftrainingfrequency AT simonschedler effectofbalancetrainingonstaticanddynamicbalanceperformanceinmaleadolescentsroleoftrainingfrequency |