Efficiency, Specificity and Temperature Sensitivity of Cas9 and Cas12a RNPs for DNA-free Genome Editing in Plants

Delivery of genome editing reagents using CRISPR-Cas ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) transfection offers several advantages over plasmid DNA-based delivery methods, including reduced off-target editing effects, mitigation of random integration of non-native DNA fragments, independence of vector constructi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raviraj Banakar, Mollie Schubert, Gavin Kurgan, Krishan Mohan Rai, Sarah F. Beaudoin, Michael A. Collingwood, Christopher A. Vakulskas, Kan Wang, Feng Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Genome Editing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgeed.2021.760820/full
_version_ 1798020439447961600
author Raviraj Banakar
Raviraj Banakar
Raviraj Banakar
Mollie Schubert
Gavin Kurgan
Krishan Mohan Rai
Krishan Mohan Rai
Krishan Mohan Rai
Sarah F. Beaudoin
Michael A. Collingwood
Christopher A. Vakulskas
Kan Wang
Kan Wang
Feng Zhang
Feng Zhang
Feng Zhang
author_facet Raviraj Banakar
Raviraj Banakar
Raviraj Banakar
Mollie Schubert
Gavin Kurgan
Krishan Mohan Rai
Krishan Mohan Rai
Krishan Mohan Rai
Sarah F. Beaudoin
Michael A. Collingwood
Christopher A. Vakulskas
Kan Wang
Kan Wang
Feng Zhang
Feng Zhang
Feng Zhang
author_sort Raviraj Banakar
collection DOAJ
description Delivery of genome editing reagents using CRISPR-Cas ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) transfection offers several advantages over plasmid DNA-based delivery methods, including reduced off-target editing effects, mitigation of random integration of non-native DNA fragments, independence of vector constructions, and less regulatory restrictions. Compared to the use in animal systems, RNP-mediated genome editing is still at the early development stage in plants. In this study, we established an efficient and simplified protoplast-based genome editing platform for CRISPR-Cas RNP delivery, and then evaluated the efficiency, specificity, and temperature sensitivity of six Cas9 and Cas12a proteins. Our results demonstrated that Cas9 and Cas12a RNP delivery resulted in genome editing frequencies (8.7–41.2%) at various temperature conditions, 22°C, 26°C, and 37°C, with no significant temperature sensitivity. LbCas12a often exhibited the highest activities, while AsCas12a demonstrated higher sequence specificity. The high activities of CRISPR-Cas RNPs at 22° and 26°C, the temperature preferred by plant transformation and tissue culture, led to high mutagenesis efficiencies (34.0–85.2%) in the protoplast-regenerated calli and plants with the heritable mutants recovered in the next generation. This RNP delivery approach was further extended to pennycress (Thlaspi arvense), soybean (Glycine max) and Setaria viridis with up to 70.2% mutagenesis frequency. Together, this study sheds light on the choice of RNP reagents to achieve efficient transgene-free genome editing in plants.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T16:57:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-18bff289bbd546329b3e1e0d0936c3a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-3439
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T16:57:31Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Genome Editing
spelling doaj.art-18bff289bbd546329b3e1e0d0936c3a52022-12-22T04:13:14ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genome Editing2673-34392022-01-01310.3389/fgeed.2021.760820760820Efficiency, Specificity and Temperature Sensitivity of Cas9 and Cas12a RNPs for DNA-free Genome Editing in PlantsRaviraj Banakar0Raviraj Banakar1Raviraj Banakar2Mollie Schubert3Gavin Kurgan4Krishan Mohan Rai5Krishan Mohan Rai6Krishan Mohan Rai7Sarah F. Beaudoin8Michael A. Collingwood9Christopher A. Vakulskas10Kan Wang11Kan Wang12Feng Zhang13Feng Zhang14Feng Zhang15Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United StatesCenter for Precision Plant Genomics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United StatesCenter for Genome Engineering, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United StatesIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, United StatesIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, United StatesDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United StatesCenter for Precision Plant Genomics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United StatesCenter for Genome Engineering, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United StatesIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, United StatesIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, United StatesIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, United StatesDepartment of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United StatesCrop Bioengineering Center, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United StatesDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United StatesCenter for Precision Plant Genomics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United StatesCenter for Genome Engineering, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United StatesDelivery of genome editing reagents using CRISPR-Cas ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) transfection offers several advantages over plasmid DNA-based delivery methods, including reduced off-target editing effects, mitigation of random integration of non-native DNA fragments, independence of vector constructions, and less regulatory restrictions. Compared to the use in animal systems, RNP-mediated genome editing is still at the early development stage in plants. In this study, we established an efficient and simplified protoplast-based genome editing platform for CRISPR-Cas RNP delivery, and then evaluated the efficiency, specificity, and temperature sensitivity of six Cas9 and Cas12a proteins. Our results demonstrated that Cas9 and Cas12a RNP delivery resulted in genome editing frequencies (8.7–41.2%) at various temperature conditions, 22°C, 26°C, and 37°C, with no significant temperature sensitivity. LbCas12a often exhibited the highest activities, while AsCas12a demonstrated higher sequence specificity. The high activities of CRISPR-Cas RNPs at 22° and 26°C, the temperature preferred by plant transformation and tissue culture, led to high mutagenesis efficiencies (34.0–85.2%) in the protoplast-regenerated calli and plants with the heritable mutants recovered in the next generation. This RNP delivery approach was further extended to pennycress (Thlaspi arvense), soybean (Glycine max) and Setaria viridis with up to 70.2% mutagenesis frequency. Together, this study sheds light on the choice of RNP reagents to achieve efficient transgene-free genome editing in plants.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgeed.2021.760820/fullNicotiana benthamianapennycressprotoplastribonucleoproteinSetaria viridissoybean
spellingShingle Raviraj Banakar
Raviraj Banakar
Raviraj Banakar
Mollie Schubert
Gavin Kurgan
Krishan Mohan Rai
Krishan Mohan Rai
Krishan Mohan Rai
Sarah F. Beaudoin
Michael A. Collingwood
Christopher A. Vakulskas
Kan Wang
Kan Wang
Feng Zhang
Feng Zhang
Feng Zhang
Efficiency, Specificity and Temperature Sensitivity of Cas9 and Cas12a RNPs for DNA-free Genome Editing in Plants
Frontiers in Genome Editing
Nicotiana benthamiana
pennycress
protoplast
ribonucleoprotein
Setaria viridis
soybean
title Efficiency, Specificity and Temperature Sensitivity of Cas9 and Cas12a RNPs for DNA-free Genome Editing in Plants
title_full Efficiency, Specificity and Temperature Sensitivity of Cas9 and Cas12a RNPs for DNA-free Genome Editing in Plants
title_fullStr Efficiency, Specificity and Temperature Sensitivity of Cas9 and Cas12a RNPs for DNA-free Genome Editing in Plants
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency, Specificity and Temperature Sensitivity of Cas9 and Cas12a RNPs for DNA-free Genome Editing in Plants
title_short Efficiency, Specificity and Temperature Sensitivity of Cas9 and Cas12a RNPs for DNA-free Genome Editing in Plants
title_sort efficiency specificity and temperature sensitivity of cas9 and cas12a rnps for dna free genome editing in plants
topic Nicotiana benthamiana
pennycress
protoplast
ribonucleoprotein
Setaria viridis
soybean
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgeed.2021.760820/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ravirajbanakar efficiencyspecificityandtemperaturesensitivityofcas9andcas12arnpsfordnafreegenomeeditinginplants
AT ravirajbanakar efficiencyspecificityandtemperaturesensitivityofcas9andcas12arnpsfordnafreegenomeeditinginplants
AT ravirajbanakar efficiencyspecificityandtemperaturesensitivityofcas9andcas12arnpsfordnafreegenomeeditinginplants
AT mollieschubert efficiencyspecificityandtemperaturesensitivityofcas9andcas12arnpsfordnafreegenomeeditinginplants
AT gavinkurgan efficiencyspecificityandtemperaturesensitivityofcas9andcas12arnpsfordnafreegenomeeditinginplants
AT krishanmohanrai efficiencyspecificityandtemperaturesensitivityofcas9andcas12arnpsfordnafreegenomeeditinginplants
AT krishanmohanrai efficiencyspecificityandtemperaturesensitivityofcas9andcas12arnpsfordnafreegenomeeditinginplants
AT krishanmohanrai efficiencyspecificityandtemperaturesensitivityofcas9andcas12arnpsfordnafreegenomeeditinginplants
AT sarahfbeaudoin efficiencyspecificityandtemperaturesensitivityofcas9andcas12arnpsfordnafreegenomeeditinginplants
AT michaelacollingwood efficiencyspecificityandtemperaturesensitivityofcas9andcas12arnpsfordnafreegenomeeditinginplants
AT christopheravakulskas efficiencyspecificityandtemperaturesensitivityofcas9andcas12arnpsfordnafreegenomeeditinginplants
AT kanwang efficiencyspecificityandtemperaturesensitivityofcas9andcas12arnpsfordnafreegenomeeditinginplants
AT kanwang efficiencyspecificityandtemperaturesensitivityofcas9andcas12arnpsfordnafreegenomeeditinginplants
AT fengzhang efficiencyspecificityandtemperaturesensitivityofcas9andcas12arnpsfordnafreegenomeeditinginplants
AT fengzhang efficiencyspecificityandtemperaturesensitivityofcas9andcas12arnpsfordnafreegenomeeditinginplants
AT fengzhang efficiencyspecificityandtemperaturesensitivityofcas9andcas12arnpsfordnafreegenomeeditinginplants