Partial volume correction analysis for 11C-UCB-J PET studies of Alzheimer's disease

Purpose: 11C-UCB-J PET imaging, targeting synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A), has been shown to be a useful indicator of synaptic density in Alzheimer's disease (AD). For SV2A imaging, a decrease in apparent tracer uptake is often due to the combination of gray-matter (GM) atrophy and SV2A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yihuan Lu, Takuya Toyonaga, Mika Naganawa, Jean-Dominique Gallezot, Ming-Kai Chen, Adam P. Mecca, Christopher H. van Dyck, Richard E. Carson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-09-01
Series:NeuroImage
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921005255
_version_ 1819085263881633792
author Yihuan Lu
Takuya Toyonaga
Mika Naganawa
Jean-Dominique Gallezot
Ming-Kai Chen
Adam P. Mecca
Christopher H. van Dyck
Richard E. Carson
author_facet Yihuan Lu
Takuya Toyonaga
Mika Naganawa
Jean-Dominique Gallezot
Ming-Kai Chen
Adam P. Mecca
Christopher H. van Dyck
Richard E. Carson
author_sort Yihuan Lu
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: 11C-UCB-J PET imaging, targeting synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A), has been shown to be a useful indicator of synaptic density in Alzheimer's disease (AD). For SV2A imaging, a decrease in apparent tracer uptake is often due to the combination of gray-matter (GM) atrophy and SV2A decrease in the remaining tissue. Our aim is to reveal the true SV2A change by performing partial volume correction (PVC). Methods: We performed two PVC algorithms, Müller-Gärtner (MG) and ‘iterative Yang’ (IY), on 17 AD participants and 11 cognitive normal (CN) participants using the brain-dedicated HRRT scanner. Distribution volume VT, the rate constant K1, binding potential BPND (centrum semiovale as reference region), and tissue volume were compared. Results: In most regions, both PVC algorithms reduced the between-group differences. Alternatively, in hippocampus, IY increased the significance of between-group differences while MG reduced it (VT, BPND and K1 group differences: uncorrected: 20%, 27%, 17%; MG: 18%, 22%, 14%; IY: 22%, 28%, 17%). The group difference in hippocampal volume (10%) was substantially smaller than any PET measures. MG increased GM binding values to a greater extent than IY due to differences in algorithm assumptions. Conclusion: 11C-UCB-J binding is significantly reduced in AD hippocampus, but PVC is important to adjust for significant volume reduction. After correction, PET measures are substantially more sensitive to group differences than volumetric MRI measures. Assumptions of each PVC algorithm are important and should be carefully examined and validated. For 11C-UCB-J, the less stringent assumptions of IY support its use as a PVC algorithm over MG.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T21:01:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b130473ba4e412bbffdd545c6e6b04d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1095-9572
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T21:01:35Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series NeuroImage
spelling doaj.art-1b130473ba4e412bbffdd545c6e6b04d2022-12-21T18:50:25ZengElsevierNeuroImage1095-95722021-09-01238118248Partial volume correction analysis for 11C-UCB-J PET studies of Alzheimer's diseaseYihuan Lu0Takuya Toyonaga1Mika Naganawa2Jean-Dominique Gallezot3Ming-Kai Chen4Adam P. Mecca5Christopher H. van Dyck6Richard E. Carson7Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, PO Box 208048, New Haven, CT 06520-8048, United States; Corresponding author.Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, PO Box 208048, New Haven, CT 06520-8048, United StatesDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, PO Box 208048, New Haven, CT 06520-8048, United StatesDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, PO Box 208048, New Haven, CT 06520-8048, United StatesDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, PO Box 208048, New Haven, CT 06520-8048, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United StatesDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, PO Box 208048, New Haven, CT 06520-8048, United StatesPurpose: 11C-UCB-J PET imaging, targeting synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A), has been shown to be a useful indicator of synaptic density in Alzheimer's disease (AD). For SV2A imaging, a decrease in apparent tracer uptake is often due to the combination of gray-matter (GM) atrophy and SV2A decrease in the remaining tissue. Our aim is to reveal the true SV2A change by performing partial volume correction (PVC). Methods: We performed two PVC algorithms, Müller-Gärtner (MG) and ‘iterative Yang’ (IY), on 17 AD participants and 11 cognitive normal (CN) participants using the brain-dedicated HRRT scanner. Distribution volume VT, the rate constant K1, binding potential BPND (centrum semiovale as reference region), and tissue volume were compared. Results: In most regions, both PVC algorithms reduced the between-group differences. Alternatively, in hippocampus, IY increased the significance of between-group differences while MG reduced it (VT, BPND and K1 group differences: uncorrected: 20%, 27%, 17%; MG: 18%, 22%, 14%; IY: 22%, 28%, 17%). The group difference in hippocampal volume (10%) was substantially smaller than any PET measures. MG increased GM binding values to a greater extent than IY due to differences in algorithm assumptions. Conclusion: 11C-UCB-J binding is significantly reduced in AD hippocampus, but PVC is important to adjust for significant volume reduction. After correction, PET measures are substantially more sensitive to group differences than volumetric MRI measures. Assumptions of each PVC algorithm are important and should be carefully examined and validated. For 11C-UCB-J, the less stringent assumptions of IY support its use as a PVC algorithm over MG.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921005255
spellingShingle Yihuan Lu
Takuya Toyonaga
Mika Naganawa
Jean-Dominique Gallezot
Ming-Kai Chen
Adam P. Mecca
Christopher H. van Dyck
Richard E. Carson
Partial volume correction analysis for 11C-UCB-J PET studies of Alzheimer's disease
NeuroImage
title Partial volume correction analysis for 11C-UCB-J PET studies of Alzheimer's disease
title_full Partial volume correction analysis for 11C-UCB-J PET studies of Alzheimer's disease
title_fullStr Partial volume correction analysis for 11C-UCB-J PET studies of Alzheimer's disease
title_full_unstemmed Partial volume correction analysis for 11C-UCB-J PET studies of Alzheimer's disease
title_short Partial volume correction analysis for 11C-UCB-J PET studies of Alzheimer's disease
title_sort partial volume correction analysis for 11c ucb j pet studies of alzheimer s disease
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921005255
work_keys_str_mv AT yihuanlu partialvolumecorrectionanalysisfor11cucbjpetstudiesofalzheimersdisease
AT takuyatoyonaga partialvolumecorrectionanalysisfor11cucbjpetstudiesofalzheimersdisease
AT mikanaganawa partialvolumecorrectionanalysisfor11cucbjpetstudiesofalzheimersdisease
AT jeandominiquegallezot partialvolumecorrectionanalysisfor11cucbjpetstudiesofalzheimersdisease
AT mingkaichen partialvolumecorrectionanalysisfor11cucbjpetstudiesofalzheimersdisease
AT adampmecca partialvolumecorrectionanalysisfor11cucbjpetstudiesofalzheimersdisease
AT christopherhvandyck partialvolumecorrectionanalysisfor11cucbjpetstudiesofalzheimersdisease
AT richardecarson partialvolumecorrectionanalysisfor11cucbjpetstudiesofalzheimersdisease