LSNet: Learned Sampling Network for 3D Object Detection from Point Clouds

The3D object detection of LiDAR point cloud data has generated widespread discussion and implementation in recent years. In this paper, we concentrate on exploring the sampling method of point-based 3D object detection in autonomous driving scenarios, a process which attempts to reduce expenditure b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mingming Wang, Qingkui Chen, Zhibing Fu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-03-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/7/1539
Description
Summary:The3D object detection of LiDAR point cloud data has generated widespread discussion and implementation in recent years. In this paper, we concentrate on exploring the sampling method of point-based 3D object detection in autonomous driving scenarios, a process which attempts to reduce expenditure by reaching sufficient accuracy using fewer selected points. FPS (farthest point sampling), the most used sampling method, works poorly in small sampling size cases, and, limited by the massive points, some newly proposed sampling methods using deep learning are not suitable for autonomous driving scenarios. To address these issues, we propose the learned sampling network (LSNet), a single-stage 3D object detection network containing an LS module that can sample important points through deep learning. This advanced approach can sample points with a task-specific focus while also being differentiable. Additionally, the LS module is streamlined for computational efficiency and transferability to replace more primitive sampling methods in other point-based networks. To reduce the issue of the high repetition rates of sampled points, a sampling loss algorithm was developed. The LS module was validated with the KITTI dataset and outperformed the other sampling methods, such as FPS and F-FPS (FPS based on feature distance). Finally, LSNet achieves acceptable accuracy with only 128 sampled points and shows promising results when the number of sampled points is small, yielding up to a 60% improvement against competing methods with eight sampled points.
ISSN:2072-4292