A Web-based Tutorial May Produce the Same Cognitive Outcomes as Face to Face Instruction. A review of: Beile, Penny M. and David N. Boote. “Does the Medium Matter?: A Comparison of a Web-Based Tutorial with Face-to-Face Library Instruction on Education Students’ Self-Efficacy Levels and Learning Outcomes.” Research Strategies 20 (2004): 57-68.

<b>Objective</b> – To determine whether library skills self-efficacy levels and learning outcomes of postgraduate education students varied with different instructional delivery methods, specifically Web-based or face to face. <br><b>Design</b> – Pre- and post-int...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gill Needham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Alberta 2006-06-01
Series:Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/39/112
_version_ 1818856888740085760
author Gill Needham
author_facet Gill Needham
author_sort Gill Needham
collection DOAJ
description <b>Objective</b> – To determine whether library skills self-efficacy levels and learning outcomes of postgraduate education students varied with different instructional delivery methods, specifically Web-based or face to face. <br><b>Design</b> – Pre- and post-intervention survey comparing three groups receiving different types of instruction. <br><b>Setting</b> – Department of Educational Studies at a large U.S. urban university. <br><b>Subjects</b> – Forty-nine masters, doctoral, and certificate-seeking education students enrolled in one of three sections of a research methods course. There were 40 female and 9 male students. <br><b>Methods</b> – Immediately before receiving library instruction, the three student groups were asked to complete a library skills selfefficacy questionnaire, comprising 30 items designed to measure students’ perceptions of their ability to successfully perform library research. They also completed a library skills test, consisting of 20 multiple choice questions, designed to assess conceptual knowledge, knowledge of database searching, and institution-specific knowledge. The intervention groups were: • Group 1 (Sixteen students) – an oncampus class that received a face to face instruction session comprised of a 70-minute demonstration of key library databases followed by an activity that allowed students to practice their skills. • Group 2 (Nineteen students) – an on-campus class that received a Web-based tutorial comprised of four interactive modules, requiring an average 80 minutes to complete. • Group 3 (Nineteen students) - a Web-based class that received the same Web-based tutorial as Group 2. The survey and test were repeated six weeks after the instruction. <br><b>Main results</b> – Both self‐efficacy scores and library skills test scores increased for all three groups post‐intervention. Average self-efficacy levels increased from a mean of 68.88 (SD=19.92) to a mean of 91.90 (SD=16.24); library skills scores increased from an average score of 58.78 (SD=13.80) to an average of 73.16 (SD=12.65). There was no statistically significant difference between the post-intervention scores of the three groups on the library skills test. However, the Web-based students in Group 3 showed a statistically significant greater increase in self‐efficacy score (78.86 to 102.36) when compared with Group 2 participants (64.74 to 83.68). <br><b>Conclusion</b> – The study provides evidence that library instruction is effective in increasing both skill levels and self-efficacy levels. It does not give a clear indication of the relative value of different modes of delivery, but it does support the contention that Web-based tutorials are at least as effective as face to face sessions.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T08:31:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1e1d090ef73145e2b4a6eb4c95a10ed7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1715-720X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T08:31:39Z
publishDate 2006-06-01
publisher University of Alberta
record_format Article
series Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
spelling doaj.art-1e1d090ef73145e2b4a6eb4c95a10ed72022-12-21T20:29:09ZengUniversity of AlbertaEvidence Based Library and Information Practice1715-720X2006-06-01123032A Web-based Tutorial May Produce the Same Cognitive Outcomes as Face to Face Instruction. A review of: Beile, Penny M. and David N. Boote. “Does the Medium Matter?: A Comparison of a Web-Based Tutorial with Face-to-Face Library Instruction on Education Students’ Self-Efficacy Levels and Learning Outcomes.” Research Strategies 20 (2004): 57-68.Gill Needham<b>Objective</b> – To determine whether library skills self-efficacy levels and learning outcomes of postgraduate education students varied with different instructional delivery methods, specifically Web-based or face to face. <br><b>Design</b> – Pre- and post-intervention survey comparing three groups receiving different types of instruction. <br><b>Setting</b> – Department of Educational Studies at a large U.S. urban university. <br><b>Subjects</b> – Forty-nine masters, doctoral, and certificate-seeking education students enrolled in one of three sections of a research methods course. There were 40 female and 9 male students. <br><b>Methods</b> – Immediately before receiving library instruction, the three student groups were asked to complete a library skills selfefficacy questionnaire, comprising 30 items designed to measure students’ perceptions of their ability to successfully perform library research. They also completed a library skills test, consisting of 20 multiple choice questions, designed to assess conceptual knowledge, knowledge of database searching, and institution-specific knowledge. The intervention groups were: • Group 1 (Sixteen students) – an oncampus class that received a face to face instruction session comprised of a 70-minute demonstration of key library databases followed by an activity that allowed students to practice their skills. • Group 2 (Nineteen students) – an on-campus class that received a Web-based tutorial comprised of four interactive modules, requiring an average 80 minutes to complete. • Group 3 (Nineteen students) - a Web-based class that received the same Web-based tutorial as Group 2. The survey and test were repeated six weeks after the instruction. <br><b>Main results</b> – Both self‐efficacy scores and library skills test scores increased for all three groups post‐intervention. Average self-efficacy levels increased from a mean of 68.88 (SD=19.92) to a mean of 91.90 (SD=16.24); library skills scores increased from an average score of 58.78 (SD=13.80) to an average of 73.16 (SD=12.65). There was no statistically significant difference between the post-intervention scores of the three groups on the library skills test. However, the Web-based students in Group 3 showed a statistically significant greater increase in self‐efficacy score (78.86 to 102.36) when compared with Group 2 participants (64.74 to 83.68). <br><b>Conclusion</b> – The study provides evidence that library instruction is effective in increasing both skill levels and self-efficacy levels. It does not give a clear indication of the relative value of different modes of delivery, but it does support the contention that Web-based tutorials are at least as effective as face to face sessions.http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/39/112Bibliographic InstructionInternetLearning
spellingShingle Gill Needham
A Web-based Tutorial May Produce the Same Cognitive Outcomes as Face to Face Instruction. A review of: Beile, Penny M. and David N. Boote. “Does the Medium Matter?: A Comparison of a Web-Based Tutorial with Face-to-Face Library Instruction on Education Students’ Self-Efficacy Levels and Learning Outcomes.” Research Strategies 20 (2004): 57-68.
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Bibliographic Instruction
Internet
Learning
title A Web-based Tutorial May Produce the Same Cognitive Outcomes as Face to Face Instruction. A review of: Beile, Penny M. and David N. Boote. “Does the Medium Matter?: A Comparison of a Web-Based Tutorial with Face-to-Face Library Instruction on Education Students’ Self-Efficacy Levels and Learning Outcomes.” Research Strategies 20 (2004): 57-68.
title_full A Web-based Tutorial May Produce the Same Cognitive Outcomes as Face to Face Instruction. A review of: Beile, Penny M. and David N. Boote. “Does the Medium Matter?: A Comparison of a Web-Based Tutorial with Face-to-Face Library Instruction on Education Students’ Self-Efficacy Levels and Learning Outcomes.” Research Strategies 20 (2004): 57-68.
title_fullStr A Web-based Tutorial May Produce the Same Cognitive Outcomes as Face to Face Instruction. A review of: Beile, Penny M. and David N. Boote. “Does the Medium Matter?: A Comparison of a Web-Based Tutorial with Face-to-Face Library Instruction on Education Students’ Self-Efficacy Levels and Learning Outcomes.” Research Strategies 20 (2004): 57-68.
title_full_unstemmed A Web-based Tutorial May Produce the Same Cognitive Outcomes as Face to Face Instruction. A review of: Beile, Penny M. and David N. Boote. “Does the Medium Matter?: A Comparison of a Web-Based Tutorial with Face-to-Face Library Instruction on Education Students’ Self-Efficacy Levels and Learning Outcomes.” Research Strategies 20 (2004): 57-68.
title_short A Web-based Tutorial May Produce the Same Cognitive Outcomes as Face to Face Instruction. A review of: Beile, Penny M. and David N. Boote. “Does the Medium Matter?: A Comparison of a Web-Based Tutorial with Face-to-Face Library Instruction on Education Students’ Self-Efficacy Levels and Learning Outcomes.” Research Strategies 20 (2004): 57-68.
title_sort web based tutorial may produce the same cognitive outcomes as face to face instruction a review of beile penny m and david n boote does the medium matter a comparison of a web based tutorial with face to face library instruction on education students self efficacy levels and learning outcomes research strategies 20 2004 57 68
topic Bibliographic Instruction
Internet
Learning
url http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/39/112
work_keys_str_mv AT gillneedham awebbasedtutorialmayproducethesamecognitiveoutcomesasfacetofaceinstructionareviewofbeilepennymanddavidnbootedoesthemediummatteracomparisonofawebbasedtutorialwithfacetofacelibraryinstructiononeducationstudentsselfefficacylevelsandlearningoutcomesresearchst
AT gillneedham webbasedtutorialmayproducethesamecognitiveoutcomesasfacetofaceinstructionareviewofbeilepennymanddavidnbootedoesthemediummatteracomparisonofawebbasedtutorialwithfacetofacelibraryinstructiononeducationstudentsselfefficacylevelsandlearningoutcomesresearchstr