Are non-constant rates and non-proportional treatment effects accounted for in the design and analysis of randomised controlled trials? A review of current practice
Abstract Background Most clinical trials with time-to-event primary outcomes are designed assuming constant event rates and proportional hazards over time. Non-constant event rates and non-proportional hazards are seen increasingly frequently in trials. The objectives of this review were firstly to...
Main Authors: | Kim Jachno, Stephane Heritier, Rory Wolfe |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-05-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-019-0749-1 |
Similar Items
-
Impact of a non-constant baseline hazard on detection of time-dependent treatment effects: a simulation study
by: Kim Jachno, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
Combined test versus logrank/Cox test in 50 randomised trials
by: Patrick Royston, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Improving the specification of the target difference in the sample size calculation of a randomised trial of treatments for osteoarthritis
by: Copsey, B
Published: (2019) -
Treating non-responders: pitfalls and implications for cancer immunotherapy trial design
by: Zhenzhen Xu, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
Power analysis for stratified cluster randomisation trials with cluster size being the stratifying factor
by: Jijia Wang, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)