Biomechanical Analysis of Single Interference Screw vs Interference Screw With Cortical Button for Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer

Background: Flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer (FHL) with a cortical button tension slide is an innovative addition that has not been measured against traditional methods. Methods: 12 pairs (n=24) of fresh-frozen cadaveric tibia-to-toe samples were used and randomized to receive one of the opera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaitlin C. Neary MD, Sarah J. McClish BS, Anthony N. Khoury PhD, Nicholas Denove BS, John Konicek BS, Coen A. Wijdicks PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-10-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114211040445
_version_ 1797772638661115904
author Kaitlin C. Neary MD
Sarah J. McClish BS
Anthony N. Khoury PhD
Nicholas Denove BS
John Konicek BS
Coen A. Wijdicks PhD
author_facet Kaitlin C. Neary MD
Sarah J. McClish BS
Anthony N. Khoury PhD
Nicholas Denove BS
John Konicek BS
Coen A. Wijdicks PhD
author_sort Kaitlin C. Neary MD
collection DOAJ
description Background: Flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer (FHL) with a cortical button tension slide is an innovative addition that has not been measured against traditional methods. Methods: 12 pairs (n=24) of fresh-frozen cadaveric tibia-to-toe samples were used and randomized to receive one of the operative FHL techniques. Specimens underwent bone density analysis. Biomechanical loading was applied between 20 and 60 N at 1 Hz for 100 cycles. Post–cyclic load to failure occurred at 1.25 mm/s. Cyclic displacement, structural stiffness, and ultimate load were derived from load-displacement curves. Student t tests evaluated significant effects between both FHL techniques. Linear regression analysis assessed interactions between bone density and strength of FHL technique. Results: Average tendon diameter was 5.44±0.46 mm. Average bone density was 1.06±0.08 g/cm 2 . Addition of a cortical button to FHL transfer did not significantly affect cyclic displacement (0.78±0.52 mm vs 0.87±0.80 mm) or structural stiffness (162.11±43.34 N/mm vs 167.57±49.19 N/mm). Cortical button addition to FHL transfer resulted in significantly increased ultimate load (343.72±68.93 N) compared with interference screw alone (255.62±77.17 N) ( P = .0002). Linear regression analyses did not reveal any significant interactions between bone density and FHL tendon transfer technique. Conclusion: Enhanced strength can be achieved with FHL tendon transfer to calcaneus using an interference screw and cortical button tension slide technique as compared to an interference screw alone. Cortical buttons in the setting of FHL tendon transfer to the calcaneus offers an additional level of support. Clinical Relevance: Operative cases presenting with poor bone quality due to osteoporosis or osteopenia could benefit from cortical button fixation during FHL transfer. Clinical studies are needed to determine if the increased construct stability conferred from the additional use of a flip button results in fewer FHL transfer failures or better clinical outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level V, Controlled Laboratory Study.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T21:54:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-225d3c755b984b9cb2d30837e328886b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2473-0114
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T21:54:51Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
spelling doaj.art-225d3c755b984b9cb2d30837e328886b2023-07-25T18:03:21ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142021-10-01610.1177/24730114211040445Biomechanical Analysis of Single Interference Screw vs Interference Screw With Cortical Button for Flexor Hallucis Longus TransferKaitlin C. Neary MD0Sarah J. McClish BS1Anthony N. Khoury PhD2Nicholas Denove BS3John Konicek BS4Coen A. Wijdicks PhD5 St Luke’s Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boise, ID, USA Department of Orthopedic Research, Arthrex, Incorporated, Naples, FL, USA Department of Orthopedic Research, Arthrex, Incorporated, Naples, FL, USA Department of Orthopedic Research, Arthrex, Incorporated, Naples, FL, USA Department of Orthopedic Research, Arthrex, Incorporated, Naples, FL, USA Department of Orthopedic Research, Arthrex, Incorporated, Naples, FL, USABackground: Flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer (FHL) with a cortical button tension slide is an innovative addition that has not been measured against traditional methods. Methods: 12 pairs (n=24) of fresh-frozen cadaveric tibia-to-toe samples were used and randomized to receive one of the operative FHL techniques. Specimens underwent bone density analysis. Biomechanical loading was applied between 20 and 60 N at 1 Hz for 100 cycles. Post–cyclic load to failure occurred at 1.25 mm/s. Cyclic displacement, structural stiffness, and ultimate load were derived from load-displacement curves. Student t tests evaluated significant effects between both FHL techniques. Linear regression analysis assessed interactions between bone density and strength of FHL technique. Results: Average tendon diameter was 5.44±0.46 mm. Average bone density was 1.06±0.08 g/cm 2 . Addition of a cortical button to FHL transfer did not significantly affect cyclic displacement (0.78±0.52 mm vs 0.87±0.80 mm) or structural stiffness (162.11±43.34 N/mm vs 167.57±49.19 N/mm). Cortical button addition to FHL transfer resulted in significantly increased ultimate load (343.72±68.93 N) compared with interference screw alone (255.62±77.17 N) ( P = .0002). Linear regression analyses did not reveal any significant interactions between bone density and FHL tendon transfer technique. Conclusion: Enhanced strength can be achieved with FHL tendon transfer to calcaneus using an interference screw and cortical button tension slide technique as compared to an interference screw alone. Cortical buttons in the setting of FHL tendon transfer to the calcaneus offers an additional level of support. Clinical Relevance: Operative cases presenting with poor bone quality due to osteoporosis or osteopenia could benefit from cortical button fixation during FHL transfer. Clinical studies are needed to determine if the increased construct stability conferred from the additional use of a flip button results in fewer FHL transfer failures or better clinical outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level V, Controlled Laboratory Study.https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114211040445
spellingShingle Kaitlin C. Neary MD
Sarah J. McClish BS
Anthony N. Khoury PhD
Nicholas Denove BS
John Konicek BS
Coen A. Wijdicks PhD
Biomechanical Analysis of Single Interference Screw vs Interference Screw With Cortical Button for Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
title Biomechanical Analysis of Single Interference Screw vs Interference Screw With Cortical Button for Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer
title_full Biomechanical Analysis of Single Interference Screw vs Interference Screw With Cortical Button for Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer
title_fullStr Biomechanical Analysis of Single Interference Screw vs Interference Screw With Cortical Button for Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Analysis of Single Interference Screw vs Interference Screw With Cortical Button for Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer
title_short Biomechanical Analysis of Single Interference Screw vs Interference Screw With Cortical Button for Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer
title_sort biomechanical analysis of single interference screw vs interference screw with cortical button for flexor hallucis longus transfer
url https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114211040445
work_keys_str_mv AT kaitlincnearymd biomechanicalanalysisofsingleinterferencescrewvsinterferencescrewwithcorticalbuttonforflexorhallucislongustransfer
AT sarahjmcclishbs biomechanicalanalysisofsingleinterferencescrewvsinterferencescrewwithcorticalbuttonforflexorhallucislongustransfer
AT anthonynkhouryphd biomechanicalanalysisofsingleinterferencescrewvsinterferencescrewwithcorticalbuttonforflexorhallucislongustransfer
AT nicholasdenovebs biomechanicalanalysisofsingleinterferencescrewvsinterferencescrewwithcorticalbuttonforflexorhallucislongustransfer
AT johnkonicekbs biomechanicalanalysisofsingleinterferencescrewvsinterferencescrewwithcorticalbuttonforflexorhallucislongustransfer
AT coenawijdicksphd biomechanicalanalysisofsingleinterferencescrewvsinterferencescrewwithcorticalbuttonforflexorhallucislongustransfer