Teacher Trainers' Perspectives and Practices Regarding Written Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: A Mixed-Methods Study in a Venezuelan University

This study takes place at a university in Venezuela where Spanish is the first language. The participants are teacher trainers on a five-year program in a subject area called English Practice, where future English language teachers develop their language skills. Adopting an interpretive stance by ex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Evelin Suij-Ojeda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Westcliff University 2017-04-01
Series:Westcliff International Journal of Applied Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wijar.westcliff.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Suji-Ojeda-2017-11-DOI.pdf
_version_ 1818960200833433600
author Evelin Suij-Ojeda
author_facet Evelin Suij-Ojeda
author_sort Evelin Suij-Ojeda
collection DOAJ
description This study takes place at a university in Venezuela where Spanish is the first language. The participants are teacher trainers on a five-year program in a subject area called English Practice, where future English language teachers develop their language skills. Adopting an interpretive stance by examining qualitative and quantitative data gathered from two online questionnaires, this exploratory research aims to explore the practices and beliefs teacher trainers have regarding written corrective feedback (WCF) on their learners’ writing in English. The findings reveal that trainers use more than one WCF strategy, favouring the use of codes and the provision of the correct form; the trainers report they aim to correct all errors encountered in their students’ written productions since they think it improves learners’ grammar accuracy while raising their language awareness. Data demonstrate that trainers WCF beliefs are influenced by previous experiences as language learners, institutional guidelines, views of second language teaching and learning and teacher development programs. Results show that trainers believe they should adopt a more rigorous WCF approach with pre-service teachers than with other learners due to the fact trainees are regarded as prospective language models who need to avoid errors in their future teaching practice.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T11:53:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2391775fddb8492398831d78a658dd41
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2572-7176
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T11:53:46Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher Westcliff University
record_format Article
series Westcliff International Journal of Applied Research
spelling doaj.art-2391775fddb8492398831d78a658dd412022-12-21T19:41:43ZengWestcliff UniversityWestcliff International Journal of Applied Research2572-71762017-04-01114656https://doi.org/10.47670/wuwijar201711ESOTeacher Trainers' Perspectives and Practices Regarding Written Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: A Mixed-Methods Study in a Venezuelan UniversityEvelin Suij-Ojeda0Westcliff UniversityThis study takes place at a university in Venezuela where Spanish is the first language. The participants are teacher trainers on a five-year program in a subject area called English Practice, where future English language teachers develop their language skills. Adopting an interpretive stance by examining qualitative and quantitative data gathered from two online questionnaires, this exploratory research aims to explore the practices and beliefs teacher trainers have regarding written corrective feedback (WCF) on their learners’ writing in English. The findings reveal that trainers use more than one WCF strategy, favouring the use of codes and the provision of the correct form; the trainers report they aim to correct all errors encountered in their students’ written productions since they think it improves learners’ grammar accuracy while raising their language awareness. Data demonstrate that trainers WCF beliefs are influenced by previous experiences as language learners, institutional guidelines, views of second language teaching and learning and teacher development programs. Results show that trainers believe they should adopt a more rigorous WCF approach with pre-service teachers than with other learners due to the fact trainees are regarded as prospective language models who need to avoid errors in their future teaching practice.https://wijar.westcliff.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Suji-Ojeda-2017-11-DOI.pdfcorrectionfeedbackbeliefswritingefl
spellingShingle Evelin Suij-Ojeda
Teacher Trainers' Perspectives and Practices Regarding Written Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: A Mixed-Methods Study in a Venezuelan University
Westcliff International Journal of Applied Research
correction
feedback
beliefs
writing
efl
title Teacher Trainers' Perspectives and Practices Regarding Written Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: A Mixed-Methods Study in a Venezuelan University
title_full Teacher Trainers' Perspectives and Practices Regarding Written Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: A Mixed-Methods Study in a Venezuelan University
title_fullStr Teacher Trainers' Perspectives and Practices Regarding Written Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: A Mixed-Methods Study in a Venezuelan University
title_full_unstemmed Teacher Trainers' Perspectives and Practices Regarding Written Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: A Mixed-Methods Study in a Venezuelan University
title_short Teacher Trainers' Perspectives and Practices Regarding Written Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: A Mixed-Methods Study in a Venezuelan University
title_sort teacher trainers perspectives and practices regarding written corrective feedback in l2 writing a mixed methods study in a venezuelan university
topic correction
feedback
beliefs
writing
efl
url https://wijar.westcliff.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Suji-Ojeda-2017-11-DOI.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT evelinsuijojeda teachertrainersperspectivesandpracticesregardingwrittencorrectivefeedbackinl2writingamixedmethodsstudyinavenezuelanuniversity