Underperforming Students: Factors and Decision-Making in Occupational Therapy Programs

The purpose of this study was to better understand factors related to occupational therapy (OT) educators’ decisions to fail underperforming students and to clarify why educators sometimes <em>fail to fail</em> or pass students despite sub-standard performance. Assessing student competen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beth Cardell, Jeanette Koski, Jessica Wahl, Wendy Rock, Anne Kirby
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Eastern Kentucky University 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Occupational Therapy Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2017.010301
_version_ 1811334488413700096
author Beth Cardell
Jeanette Koski
Jessica Wahl
Wendy Rock
Anne Kirby
author_facet Beth Cardell
Jeanette Koski
Jessica Wahl
Wendy Rock
Anne Kirby
author_sort Beth Cardell
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this study was to better understand factors related to occupational therapy (OT) educators’ decisions to fail underperforming students and to clarify why educators sometimes <em>fail to fail</em> or pass students despite sub-standard performance. Assessing student competence is an essential part of ensuring the safety of those receiving occupational therapy services and ensuring the integrity of the OT profession. Educators in academic and fieldwork settings are responsible for confirming that students who graduate from their programs are able to demonstrate skills required for entry into the profession. A total of 323 OT academic and fieldwork educators responded to a researcher developed survey. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and linear regressions. 82% of OT academic educators and 34% of OT fieldwork educators reported failing a student at one time and results revealed common reasons for both groups. In addition, 60% of OT academic educators and 26% of OT fieldwork educators thought there had been a time when they should have failed an underperforming student but did not. Common reasons for <em>failure to fail</em> included lack of proof, vague procedures, giving students the benefit of the doubt, and decreased confidence in handling a failing situation. Recommendations to minimize <em>failure to fail</em> are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T17:09:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-252925c8f6e24aafb97f5665592f4384
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2573-1378
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T17:09:36Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Eastern Kentucky University
record_format Article
series Journal of Occupational Therapy Education
spelling doaj.art-252925c8f6e24aafb97f5665592f43842022-12-22T02:38:20ZengEastern Kentucky UniversityJournal of Occupational Therapy Education2573-13782017-01-011310.26681/jote.2017.010301Underperforming Students: Factors and Decision-Making in Occupational Therapy ProgramsBeth Cardell0Jeanette Koski1Jessica Wahl2Wendy RockAnne Kirby3University of UtahUniversity of UtahPrimary Children's HospitalUniversity of UtahThe purpose of this study was to better understand factors related to occupational therapy (OT) educators’ decisions to fail underperforming students and to clarify why educators sometimes <em>fail to fail</em> or pass students despite sub-standard performance. Assessing student competence is an essential part of ensuring the safety of those receiving occupational therapy services and ensuring the integrity of the OT profession. Educators in academic and fieldwork settings are responsible for confirming that students who graduate from their programs are able to demonstrate skills required for entry into the profession. A total of 323 OT academic and fieldwork educators responded to a researcher developed survey. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and linear regressions. 82% of OT academic educators and 34% of OT fieldwork educators reported failing a student at one time and results revealed common reasons for both groups. In addition, 60% of OT academic educators and 26% of OT fieldwork educators thought there had been a time when they should have failed an underperforming student but did not. Common reasons for <em>failure to fail</em> included lack of proof, vague procedures, giving students the benefit of the doubt, and decreased confidence in handling a failing situation. Recommendations to minimize <em>failure to fail</em> are discussed.https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2017.010301Failure to failunderperforming studentsfieldworkoccupational therapyeducators
spellingShingle Beth Cardell
Jeanette Koski
Jessica Wahl
Wendy Rock
Anne Kirby
Underperforming Students: Factors and Decision-Making in Occupational Therapy Programs
Journal of Occupational Therapy Education
Failure to fail
underperforming students
fieldwork
occupational therapy
educators
title Underperforming Students: Factors and Decision-Making in Occupational Therapy Programs
title_full Underperforming Students: Factors and Decision-Making in Occupational Therapy Programs
title_fullStr Underperforming Students: Factors and Decision-Making in Occupational Therapy Programs
title_full_unstemmed Underperforming Students: Factors and Decision-Making in Occupational Therapy Programs
title_short Underperforming Students: Factors and Decision-Making in Occupational Therapy Programs
title_sort underperforming students factors and decision making in occupational therapy programs
topic Failure to fail
underperforming students
fieldwork
occupational therapy
educators
url https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2017.010301
work_keys_str_mv AT bethcardell underperformingstudentsfactorsanddecisionmakinginoccupationaltherapyprograms
AT jeanettekoski underperformingstudentsfactorsanddecisionmakinginoccupationaltherapyprograms
AT jessicawahl underperformingstudentsfactorsanddecisionmakinginoccupationaltherapyprograms
AT wendyrock underperformingstudentsfactorsanddecisionmakinginoccupationaltherapyprograms
AT annekirby underperformingstudentsfactorsanddecisionmakinginoccupationaltherapyprograms