Effects of masculinity vs. femininity on competence judgement of politician faces and election outcome prediction

Abstract First impressions of politician faces can be effective in predicting election outcomes, based on perceived competence from candidate photographs. However, it remains unclear whether such effects arose from facial features or other non-facial information present in the photographs (e.g. hair...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olivia S. Cheung, Davit Jintcharadze
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-10-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44159-7
_version_ 1797559674756661248
author Olivia S. Cheung
Davit Jintcharadze
author_facet Olivia S. Cheung
Davit Jintcharadze
author_sort Olivia S. Cheung
collection DOAJ
description Abstract First impressions of politician faces can be effective in predicting election outcomes, based on perceived competence from candidate photographs. However, it remains unclear whether such effects arose from facial features or other non-facial information present in the photographs (e.g. hairstyles, clothes, or poses). In four pre-registered studies, participants completed two tasks in a counter-balanced order: rating competence of individually presented faces and predicting election outcome of each pair of winner and runner-up faces. We examined competence judgment and election outcome prediction on faces from male politicians depicted on original portraits (Experiment 1), or on computer-generated faces with facial features extracted from the portraits (Experiment 2). The faces were then either masculinized or feminized (Experiments 3 and 4). We found that competence ratings were significantly higher for winners than runners-up and that winners were more likely predicted to win the elections than runners-up in all but Experiment 4, where faces of the winners were feminized and faces of the runners-up were masculinized. Regardless of facial feature changes, correlations were found between competence ratings and election outcome prediction. These findings suggest that facial features are critical for evaluating competence and predicting election outcome, and that masculine features may enhance stereotypical leadership impressions.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T17:48:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2ab69e004a984c07a2bcb80faa87cfca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T17:48:41Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-2ab69e004a984c07a2bcb80faa87cfca2023-11-20T09:26:02ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-10-0113111210.1038/s41598-023-44159-7Effects of masculinity vs. femininity on competence judgement of politician faces and election outcome predictionOlivia S. Cheung0Davit Jintcharadze1Department of Psychology, Division of Science, New York University Abu DhabiDepartment of Psychology, Division of Science, New York University Abu DhabiAbstract First impressions of politician faces can be effective in predicting election outcomes, based on perceived competence from candidate photographs. However, it remains unclear whether such effects arose from facial features or other non-facial information present in the photographs (e.g. hairstyles, clothes, or poses). In four pre-registered studies, participants completed two tasks in a counter-balanced order: rating competence of individually presented faces and predicting election outcome of each pair of winner and runner-up faces. We examined competence judgment and election outcome prediction on faces from male politicians depicted on original portraits (Experiment 1), or on computer-generated faces with facial features extracted from the portraits (Experiment 2). The faces were then either masculinized or feminized (Experiments 3 and 4). We found that competence ratings were significantly higher for winners than runners-up and that winners were more likely predicted to win the elections than runners-up in all but Experiment 4, where faces of the winners were feminized and faces of the runners-up were masculinized. Regardless of facial feature changes, correlations were found between competence ratings and election outcome prediction. These findings suggest that facial features are critical for evaluating competence and predicting election outcome, and that masculine features may enhance stereotypical leadership impressions.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44159-7
spellingShingle Olivia S. Cheung
Davit Jintcharadze
Effects of masculinity vs. femininity on competence judgement of politician faces and election outcome prediction
Scientific Reports
title Effects of masculinity vs. femininity on competence judgement of politician faces and election outcome prediction
title_full Effects of masculinity vs. femininity on competence judgement of politician faces and election outcome prediction
title_fullStr Effects of masculinity vs. femininity on competence judgement of politician faces and election outcome prediction
title_full_unstemmed Effects of masculinity vs. femininity on competence judgement of politician faces and election outcome prediction
title_short Effects of masculinity vs. femininity on competence judgement of politician faces and election outcome prediction
title_sort effects of masculinity vs femininity on competence judgement of politician faces and election outcome prediction
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44159-7
work_keys_str_mv AT oliviascheung effectsofmasculinityvsfemininityoncompetencejudgementofpoliticianfacesandelectionoutcomeprediction
AT davitjintcharadze effectsofmasculinityvsfemininityoncompetencejudgementofpoliticianfacesandelectionoutcomeprediction