The Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Organizational Cynicism Moderated by Hope

Theoretical and empirical evidence suggests that organizational justice impacts organizational cynicism, but the influence of its various dimensions is inconsistent. This inconsistency necessitates the introduction of moderating variables for a more comprehensive understanding. In this context, hope...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dewo Agung Nugroho Narosaputra, I Ketut Pangestu, Marssel Michael Sengkey
Format: Article
Language:Indonesian
Published: Universitas Gadjah Mada 2023-12-01
Series:Jurnal Psikologi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jpsi/article/view/79518
_version_ 1827396917352464384
author Dewo Agung Nugroho Narosaputra
I Ketut Pangestu
Marssel Michael Sengkey
author_facet Dewo Agung Nugroho Narosaputra
I Ketut Pangestu
Marssel Michael Sengkey
author_sort Dewo Agung Nugroho Narosaputra
collection DOAJ
description Theoretical and empirical evidence suggests that organizational justice impacts organizational cynicism, but the influence of its various dimensions is inconsistent. This inconsistency necessitates the introduction of moderating variables for a more comprehensive understanding. In this context, hope is selected as a moderating variable due to its ability to mitigate the adverse effects of organizational cynicism. The objective of this study is to explore how distributive, procedural, and interactional justice affect organizational cynicism, with hope serving as a moderating factor. The research adopts an explanatory correlational design. Participants include 126 employees from the Mojokerto State Police School (SPN), selected through census sampling. The study utilizes scales for measuring organizational cynicism, organizational justice, and hope. Data is analyzed using moderated regression analysis (MRA). The findings reveal that distributive and interactional justice negatively impact organizational cynicism. Moreover, hope moderates the relationship between procedural justice and organizational cynicism, as well as the impact of interactional justice on cynicism. Significantly, hope moderates the effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on organizational cynicism, underscoring its role in enhancing the impact of these justice dimensions on cynicism. This research contributes to a nuanced understanding of the interplay between organizational justice and cynicism, highlighting the critical role of hope as a moderator.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T18:58:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2ac1b0b1b107434eb2c1ae4a6fb0766c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0215-8884
2460-867X
language Indonesian
last_indexed 2024-03-08T18:58:40Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Universitas Gadjah Mada
record_format Article
series Jurnal Psikologi
spelling doaj.art-2ac1b0b1b107434eb2c1ae4a6fb0766c2023-12-28T08:37:15ZindUniversitas Gadjah MadaJurnal Psikologi0215-88842460-867X2023-12-0150310.22146/jpsi.7951835120The Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Organizational Cynicism Moderated by HopeDewo Agung Nugroho Narosaputra0I Ketut Pangestu1Marssel Michael Sengkey2Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Negeri ManadoFaculty of Psychology, Universitas Negeri ManadoFaculty of PSychology, Universitas Negeri ManadoTheoretical and empirical evidence suggests that organizational justice impacts organizational cynicism, but the influence of its various dimensions is inconsistent. This inconsistency necessitates the introduction of moderating variables for a more comprehensive understanding. In this context, hope is selected as a moderating variable due to its ability to mitigate the adverse effects of organizational cynicism. The objective of this study is to explore how distributive, procedural, and interactional justice affect organizational cynicism, with hope serving as a moderating factor. The research adopts an explanatory correlational design. Participants include 126 employees from the Mojokerto State Police School (SPN), selected through census sampling. The study utilizes scales for measuring organizational cynicism, organizational justice, and hope. Data is analyzed using moderated regression analysis (MRA). The findings reveal that distributive and interactional justice negatively impact organizational cynicism. Moreover, hope moderates the relationship between procedural justice and organizational cynicism, as well as the impact of interactional justice on cynicism. Significantly, hope moderates the effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on organizational cynicism, underscoring its role in enhancing the impact of these justice dimensions on cynicism. This research contributes to a nuanced understanding of the interplay between organizational justice and cynicism, highlighting the critical role of hope as a moderator.https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jpsi/article/view/79518distributivehopeinteractionalorganizational cynicismprocedural
spellingShingle Dewo Agung Nugroho Narosaputra
I Ketut Pangestu
Marssel Michael Sengkey
The Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Organizational Cynicism Moderated by Hope
Jurnal Psikologi
distributive
hope
interactional
organizational cynicism
procedural
title The Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Organizational Cynicism Moderated by Hope
title_full The Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Organizational Cynicism Moderated by Hope
title_fullStr The Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Organizational Cynicism Moderated by Hope
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Organizational Cynicism Moderated by Hope
title_short The Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Organizational Cynicism Moderated by Hope
title_sort effect of distributive procedural and interactional justice on organizational cynicism moderated by hope
topic distributive
hope
interactional
organizational cynicism
procedural
url https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jpsi/article/view/79518
work_keys_str_mv AT dewoagungnugrohonarosaputra theeffectofdistributiveproceduralandinteractionaljusticeonorganizationalcynicismmoderatedbyhope
AT iketutpangestu theeffectofdistributiveproceduralandinteractionaljusticeonorganizationalcynicismmoderatedbyhope
AT marsselmichaelsengkey theeffectofdistributiveproceduralandinteractionaljusticeonorganizationalcynicismmoderatedbyhope
AT dewoagungnugrohonarosaputra effectofdistributiveproceduralandinteractionaljusticeonorganizationalcynicismmoderatedbyhope
AT iketutpangestu effectofdistributiveproceduralandinteractionaljusticeonorganizationalcynicismmoderatedbyhope
AT marsselmichaelsengkey effectofdistributiveproceduralandinteractionaljusticeonorganizationalcynicismmoderatedbyhope