The Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Organizational Cynicism Moderated by Hope
Theoretical and empirical evidence suggests that organizational justice impacts organizational cynicism, but the influence of its various dimensions is inconsistent. This inconsistency necessitates the introduction of moderating variables for a more comprehensive understanding. In this context, hope...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Indonesian |
Published: |
Universitas Gadjah Mada
2023-12-01
|
Series: | Jurnal Psikologi |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jpsi/article/view/79518 |
_version_ | 1827396917352464384 |
---|---|
author | Dewo Agung Nugroho Narosaputra I Ketut Pangestu Marssel Michael Sengkey |
author_facet | Dewo Agung Nugroho Narosaputra I Ketut Pangestu Marssel Michael Sengkey |
author_sort | Dewo Agung Nugroho Narosaputra |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Theoretical and empirical evidence suggests that organizational justice impacts organizational cynicism, but the influence of its various dimensions is inconsistent. This inconsistency necessitates the introduction of moderating variables for a more comprehensive understanding. In this context, hope is selected as a moderating variable due to its ability to mitigate the adverse effects of organizational cynicism. The objective of this study is to explore how distributive, procedural, and interactional justice affect organizational cynicism, with hope serving as a moderating factor. The research adopts an explanatory correlational design. Participants include 126 employees from the Mojokerto State Police School (SPN), selected through census sampling. The study utilizes scales for measuring organizational cynicism, organizational justice, and hope. Data is analyzed using moderated regression analysis (MRA). The findings reveal that distributive and interactional justice negatively impact organizational cynicism. Moreover, hope moderates the relationship between procedural justice and organizational cynicism, as well as the impact of interactional justice on cynicism. Significantly, hope moderates the effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on organizational cynicism, underscoring its role in enhancing the impact of these justice dimensions on cynicism. This research contributes to a nuanced understanding of the interplay between organizational justice and cynicism, highlighting the critical role of hope as a moderator. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T18:58:40Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2ac1b0b1b107434eb2c1ae4a6fb0766c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0215-8884 2460-867X |
language | Indonesian |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T18:58:40Z |
publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
publisher | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
record_format | Article |
series | Jurnal Psikologi |
spelling | doaj.art-2ac1b0b1b107434eb2c1ae4a6fb0766c2023-12-28T08:37:15ZindUniversitas Gadjah MadaJurnal Psikologi0215-88842460-867X2023-12-0150310.22146/jpsi.7951835120The Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Organizational Cynicism Moderated by HopeDewo Agung Nugroho Narosaputra0I Ketut Pangestu1Marssel Michael Sengkey2Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Negeri ManadoFaculty of Psychology, Universitas Negeri ManadoFaculty of PSychology, Universitas Negeri ManadoTheoretical and empirical evidence suggests that organizational justice impacts organizational cynicism, but the influence of its various dimensions is inconsistent. This inconsistency necessitates the introduction of moderating variables for a more comprehensive understanding. In this context, hope is selected as a moderating variable due to its ability to mitigate the adverse effects of organizational cynicism. The objective of this study is to explore how distributive, procedural, and interactional justice affect organizational cynicism, with hope serving as a moderating factor. The research adopts an explanatory correlational design. Participants include 126 employees from the Mojokerto State Police School (SPN), selected through census sampling. The study utilizes scales for measuring organizational cynicism, organizational justice, and hope. Data is analyzed using moderated regression analysis (MRA). The findings reveal that distributive and interactional justice negatively impact organizational cynicism. Moreover, hope moderates the relationship between procedural justice and organizational cynicism, as well as the impact of interactional justice on cynicism. Significantly, hope moderates the effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on organizational cynicism, underscoring its role in enhancing the impact of these justice dimensions on cynicism. This research contributes to a nuanced understanding of the interplay between organizational justice and cynicism, highlighting the critical role of hope as a moderator.https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jpsi/article/view/79518distributivehopeinteractionalorganizational cynicismprocedural |
spellingShingle | Dewo Agung Nugroho Narosaputra I Ketut Pangestu Marssel Michael Sengkey The Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Organizational Cynicism Moderated by Hope Jurnal Psikologi distributive hope interactional organizational cynicism procedural |
title | The Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Organizational Cynicism Moderated by Hope |
title_full | The Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Organizational Cynicism Moderated by Hope |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Organizational Cynicism Moderated by Hope |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Organizational Cynicism Moderated by Hope |
title_short | The Effect of Distributive, Procedural, and Interactional Justice on Organizational Cynicism Moderated by Hope |
title_sort | effect of distributive procedural and interactional justice on organizational cynicism moderated by hope |
topic | distributive hope interactional organizational cynicism procedural |
url | https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jpsi/article/view/79518 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dewoagungnugrohonarosaputra theeffectofdistributiveproceduralandinteractionaljusticeonorganizationalcynicismmoderatedbyhope AT iketutpangestu theeffectofdistributiveproceduralandinteractionaljusticeonorganizationalcynicismmoderatedbyhope AT marsselmichaelsengkey theeffectofdistributiveproceduralandinteractionaljusticeonorganizationalcynicismmoderatedbyhope AT dewoagungnugrohonarosaputra effectofdistributiveproceduralandinteractionaljusticeonorganizationalcynicismmoderatedbyhope AT iketutpangestu effectofdistributiveproceduralandinteractionaljusticeonorganizationalcynicismmoderatedbyhope AT marsselmichaelsengkey effectofdistributiveproceduralandinteractionaljusticeonorganizationalcynicismmoderatedbyhope |