Biomedical journal speed and efficiency: a cross-sectional pilot survey of author experiences
Abstract Background Although the peer review process is believed to ensure scientific rigor, enhance research quality, and improve manuscript clarity, many investigators are concerned that the process is too slow, too expensive, too unreliable, and too static. In this feasibility study, we sought to...
Main Authors: | Joshua D. Wallach, Alexander C. Egilman, Anand D. Gopal, Nishwant Swami, Harlan M. Krumholz, Joseph S. Ross |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Research Integrity and Peer Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41073-017-0045-8 |
Similar Items
-
The future of journals
by: Harlan M. Krumholz
Published: (2022-08-01) -
Peer review ethics in Iranian LIS scholarly journals: a comparison between views of reviewers and authors
by: Rahmatollah Fattahi, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Where do we aspire to publish? A position paper on scientific communication in biochemistry and molecular biology
by: M.S. Baptista, et al. -
Peer Review Ethics in Iranian Scientific Journals: Evidence-Based Case Study of the Journal of Information Processing and Management (JIPM)
by: Reza Rajabali beglou, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing 2007 Thanks to Peer Reviewers and Authors
by: Isabel CF da Cruz
Published: (2007-11-01)