Heterogeneity in biological assemblages and exposure in chemical risk assessment: Exploring capabilities and challenges in methodology with two landscape-scale case studies

Chemical exposure concentrations and the composition of ecological receptors (e.g., species) vary in space and time, resulting in landscape-scale (e.g. catchment) heterogeneity. Current regulatory, prospective chemical risk assessment frameworks do not directly address this heterogeneity because the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher M. Holmes, Lorraine Maltby, Paul Sweeney, Pernille Thorbek, Jens C. Otte, Stuart Marshall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-11-01
Series:Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651322009836
_version_ 1797991041425473536
author Christopher M. Holmes
Lorraine Maltby
Paul Sweeney
Pernille Thorbek
Jens C. Otte
Stuart Marshall
author_facet Christopher M. Holmes
Lorraine Maltby
Paul Sweeney
Pernille Thorbek
Jens C. Otte
Stuart Marshall
author_sort Christopher M. Holmes
collection DOAJ
description Chemical exposure concentrations and the composition of ecological receptors (e.g., species) vary in space and time, resulting in landscape-scale (e.g. catchment) heterogeneity. Current regulatory, prospective chemical risk assessment frameworks do not directly address this heterogeneity because they assume that reasonably worst-case chemical exposure concentrations co-occur (spatially and temporally) with biological species that are the most sensitive to the chemical’s toxicity. Whilst current approaches may parameterise fate models with site-specific data and aim to be protective, a more precise understanding of when and where chemical exposure and species sensitivity co-occur enables risk assessments to be better tailored and applied mitigation more efficient. We use two aquatic case studies covering different spatial and temporal resolution to explore how geo-referenced data and spatial tools might be used to account for landscape heterogeneity of chemical exposure and ecological assemblages in prospective risk assessment. Each case study followed a stepwise approach: i) estimate and establish spatial chemical exposure distributions using local environmental information and environmental fate models; ii) derive toxicity thresholds for different taxonomic groups and determine geo-referenced distributions of exposure-toxicity ratios (i.e., potential risk); iii) overlay risk data with the ecological status of biomonitoring sites to determine if relationships exist. We focus on demonstrating whether the integration of relevant data and potential approaches is feasible rather than making comprehensive and refined risk assessments of specific chemicals. The case studies indicate that geo-referenced predicted environmental concentration estimations can be achieved with available data, models and tools but establishing the distribution of species assemblages is reliant on the availability of a few sources of biomonitoring data and tools. Linking large sets of geo-referenced exposure and biomonitoring data is feasible but assessment of risk will often be limited by the availability of ecotoxicity data. The studies highlight the important influence that choices for aggregating data and for the selection of statistical metrics have on assessing and interpreting risk at different spatial scales and patterns of distribution within the landscape. Finally, we discuss approaches and development needs that could help to address environmental heterogeneity in chemical risk assessment.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T08:46:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2bc0736ca13a43c08d58e52b90872bc0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0147-6513
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T08:46:09Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
spelling doaj.art-2bc0736ca13a43c08d58e52b90872bc02022-12-22T04:33:58ZengElsevierEcotoxicology and Environmental Safety0147-65132022-11-01246114143Heterogeneity in biological assemblages and exposure in chemical risk assessment: Exploring capabilities and challenges in methodology with two landscape-scale case studiesChristopher M. Holmes0Lorraine Maltby1Paul Sweeney2Pernille Thorbek3Jens C. Otte4Stuart Marshall5Applied Analysis Solutions LLC, Berryville, VA 22611, USAThe University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UKSyngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell RG42 6EY, UKBASF, Speyerer Strasse 2, 67117 Limburgerhof, GermanyBASF, Carl-Bosch-Strasse 38, 67056 Ludwigshafen, GermanyPrestwick Road, Great Denham, Bedford MK40 4FH, UK; Corresponding author.Chemical exposure concentrations and the composition of ecological receptors (e.g., species) vary in space and time, resulting in landscape-scale (e.g. catchment) heterogeneity. Current regulatory, prospective chemical risk assessment frameworks do not directly address this heterogeneity because they assume that reasonably worst-case chemical exposure concentrations co-occur (spatially and temporally) with biological species that are the most sensitive to the chemical’s toxicity. Whilst current approaches may parameterise fate models with site-specific data and aim to be protective, a more precise understanding of when and where chemical exposure and species sensitivity co-occur enables risk assessments to be better tailored and applied mitigation more efficient. We use two aquatic case studies covering different spatial and temporal resolution to explore how geo-referenced data and spatial tools might be used to account for landscape heterogeneity of chemical exposure and ecological assemblages in prospective risk assessment. Each case study followed a stepwise approach: i) estimate and establish spatial chemical exposure distributions using local environmental information and environmental fate models; ii) derive toxicity thresholds for different taxonomic groups and determine geo-referenced distributions of exposure-toxicity ratios (i.e., potential risk); iii) overlay risk data with the ecological status of biomonitoring sites to determine if relationships exist. We focus on demonstrating whether the integration of relevant data and potential approaches is feasible rather than making comprehensive and refined risk assessments of specific chemicals. The case studies indicate that geo-referenced predicted environmental concentration estimations can be achieved with available data, models and tools but establishing the distribution of species assemblages is reliant on the availability of a few sources of biomonitoring data and tools. Linking large sets of geo-referenced exposure and biomonitoring data is feasible but assessment of risk will often be limited by the availability of ecotoxicity data. The studies highlight the important influence that choices for aggregating data and for the selection of statistical metrics have on assessing and interpreting risk at different spatial scales and patterns of distribution within the landscape. Finally, we discuss approaches and development needs that could help to address environmental heterogeneity in chemical risk assessment.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651322009836Geo-referenced risk assessmentLandscape-scaleEnvironmental heterogeneitySpatial mappingBiomonitoringInterpreting risk
spellingShingle Christopher M. Holmes
Lorraine Maltby
Paul Sweeney
Pernille Thorbek
Jens C. Otte
Stuart Marshall
Heterogeneity in biological assemblages and exposure in chemical risk assessment: Exploring capabilities and challenges in methodology with two landscape-scale case studies
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Geo-referenced risk assessment
Landscape-scale
Environmental heterogeneity
Spatial mapping
Biomonitoring
Interpreting risk
title Heterogeneity in biological assemblages and exposure in chemical risk assessment: Exploring capabilities and challenges in methodology with two landscape-scale case studies
title_full Heterogeneity in biological assemblages and exposure in chemical risk assessment: Exploring capabilities and challenges in methodology with two landscape-scale case studies
title_fullStr Heterogeneity in biological assemblages and exposure in chemical risk assessment: Exploring capabilities and challenges in methodology with two landscape-scale case studies
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneity in biological assemblages and exposure in chemical risk assessment: Exploring capabilities and challenges in methodology with two landscape-scale case studies
title_short Heterogeneity in biological assemblages and exposure in chemical risk assessment: Exploring capabilities and challenges in methodology with two landscape-scale case studies
title_sort heterogeneity in biological assemblages and exposure in chemical risk assessment exploring capabilities and challenges in methodology with two landscape scale case studies
topic Geo-referenced risk assessment
Landscape-scale
Environmental heterogeneity
Spatial mapping
Biomonitoring
Interpreting risk
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651322009836
work_keys_str_mv AT christophermholmes heterogeneityinbiologicalassemblagesandexposureinchemicalriskassessmentexploringcapabilitiesandchallengesinmethodologywithtwolandscapescalecasestudies
AT lorrainemaltby heterogeneityinbiologicalassemblagesandexposureinchemicalriskassessmentexploringcapabilitiesandchallengesinmethodologywithtwolandscapescalecasestudies
AT paulsweeney heterogeneityinbiologicalassemblagesandexposureinchemicalriskassessmentexploringcapabilitiesandchallengesinmethodologywithtwolandscapescalecasestudies
AT pernillethorbek heterogeneityinbiologicalassemblagesandexposureinchemicalriskassessmentexploringcapabilitiesandchallengesinmethodologywithtwolandscapescalecasestudies
AT jenscotte heterogeneityinbiologicalassemblagesandexposureinchemicalriskassessmentexploringcapabilitiesandchallengesinmethodologywithtwolandscapescalecasestudies
AT stuartmarshall heterogeneityinbiologicalassemblagesandexposureinchemicalriskassessmentexploringcapabilitiesandchallengesinmethodologywithtwolandscapescalecasestudies