The validity evaluation of different 16srRNA gene primers for helicobacter detection urgently requesting to design new specific primers

Abstract Molecular diagnosis of helicobacters by PCR is simpler, more accurate, and feasible compared to other diagnostic methods. Validity and accuracy are highly dependent on the PCR primer design, diffusion time, and mutation rate of helicobacters. This study aimed to design 16srRNA -specific pri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shaymaa Abdelmalek, Karim Shokry, Wafy Hamed, Mohammed Abdelnaser, Ashraf Aboubakr, Sameh Abou Elenin, Mohamed Ali, Mohamed Mostafa, Mahmoud Abou-Okada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-06-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14600-4
_version_ 1818256954584203264
author Shaymaa Abdelmalek
Karim Shokry
Wafy Hamed
Mohammed Abdelnaser
Ashraf Aboubakr
Sameh Abou Elenin
Mohamed Ali
Mohamed Mostafa
Mahmoud Abou-Okada
author_facet Shaymaa Abdelmalek
Karim Shokry
Wafy Hamed
Mohammed Abdelnaser
Ashraf Aboubakr
Sameh Abou Elenin
Mohamed Ali
Mohamed Mostafa
Mahmoud Abou-Okada
author_sort Shaymaa Abdelmalek
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Molecular diagnosis of helicobacters by PCR is simpler, more accurate, and feasible compared to other diagnostic methods. Validity and accuracy are highly dependent on the PCR primer design, diffusion time, and mutation rate of helicobacters. This study aimed to design 16srRNA -specific primers for Helicobacter spp. and H. pylori. Application of comparative statistical analysis of the diagnostic utility of the most available 16srRNA genus-specific primers. The new primers were designed using bioinformatics tools (MAFFT MSA and Gblocks command line). A comparative study was applied on nine genus-specific 16srRNA primers in comparison to the ConsH using in silico and laboratory evaluation. The results demonstrated that the best specificity and sensitivity of the primers designed for this study compared to other primers. The comparative study revealed that the heminested outer/inner primers were the worst. Although H276, 16srRNA(a), HeliS/Heli-nest, and Hcom had acceptable diagnostic utility, false positive and false negative results were obtained. Specificity testing on clinical samples indicated a surprising result; that H. pylori was not the sole enemy that we were looking for, but the Non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacters should be considered as a real risk prognostic for gastric diseases, consequently, a specific diagnosis and treatment should be developed. This study concluded that our designed primers were the most specific and sensitive in comparison with other primers. In addition, in silico evaluation is not accurate enough for primer assessment and that the laboratory evaluation is mandatory.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T17:35:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2bc34d674ee7448ca1558e5c6f01c9c4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T17:35:58Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-2bc34d674ee7448ca1558e5c6f01c9c42022-12-22T00:17:12ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-06-0112111110.1038/s41598-022-14600-4The validity evaluation of different 16srRNA gene primers for helicobacter detection urgently requesting to design new specific primersShaymaa Abdelmalek0Karim Shokry1Wafy Hamed2Mohammed Abdelnaser3Ashraf Aboubakr4Sameh Abou Elenin5Mohamed Ali6Mohamed Mostafa7Mahmoud Abou-Okada8Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo UniversityDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo UniversityDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sadat CityInternal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Elmaadi Military Medical HospitalInternal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Elmaadi Military Medical HospitalInternal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Elmaadi Military Medical HospitalInternal Medicine and Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Helwan Military Production HospitalInternal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Ahmed Maher HospitalAquatic Animal Medicine and Management, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo UniversityAbstract Molecular diagnosis of helicobacters by PCR is simpler, more accurate, and feasible compared to other diagnostic methods. Validity and accuracy are highly dependent on the PCR primer design, diffusion time, and mutation rate of helicobacters. This study aimed to design 16srRNA -specific primers for Helicobacter spp. and H. pylori. Application of comparative statistical analysis of the diagnostic utility of the most available 16srRNA genus-specific primers. The new primers were designed using bioinformatics tools (MAFFT MSA and Gblocks command line). A comparative study was applied on nine genus-specific 16srRNA primers in comparison to the ConsH using in silico and laboratory evaluation. The results demonstrated that the best specificity and sensitivity of the primers designed for this study compared to other primers. The comparative study revealed that the heminested outer/inner primers were the worst. Although H276, 16srRNA(a), HeliS/Heli-nest, and Hcom had acceptable diagnostic utility, false positive and false negative results were obtained. Specificity testing on clinical samples indicated a surprising result; that H. pylori was not the sole enemy that we were looking for, but the Non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacters should be considered as a real risk prognostic for gastric diseases, consequently, a specific diagnosis and treatment should be developed. This study concluded that our designed primers were the most specific and sensitive in comparison with other primers. In addition, in silico evaluation is not accurate enough for primer assessment and that the laboratory evaluation is mandatory.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14600-4
spellingShingle Shaymaa Abdelmalek
Karim Shokry
Wafy Hamed
Mohammed Abdelnaser
Ashraf Aboubakr
Sameh Abou Elenin
Mohamed Ali
Mohamed Mostafa
Mahmoud Abou-Okada
The validity evaluation of different 16srRNA gene primers for helicobacter detection urgently requesting to design new specific primers
Scientific Reports
title The validity evaluation of different 16srRNA gene primers for helicobacter detection urgently requesting to design new specific primers
title_full The validity evaluation of different 16srRNA gene primers for helicobacter detection urgently requesting to design new specific primers
title_fullStr The validity evaluation of different 16srRNA gene primers for helicobacter detection urgently requesting to design new specific primers
title_full_unstemmed The validity evaluation of different 16srRNA gene primers for helicobacter detection urgently requesting to design new specific primers
title_short The validity evaluation of different 16srRNA gene primers for helicobacter detection urgently requesting to design new specific primers
title_sort validity evaluation of different 16srrna gene primers for helicobacter detection urgently requesting to design new specific primers
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14600-4
work_keys_str_mv AT shaymaaabdelmalek thevalidityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers
AT karimshokry thevalidityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers
AT wafyhamed thevalidityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers
AT mohammedabdelnaser thevalidityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers
AT ashrafaboubakr thevalidityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers
AT samehabouelenin thevalidityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers
AT mohamedali thevalidityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers
AT mohamedmostafa thevalidityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers
AT mahmoudabouokada thevalidityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers
AT shaymaaabdelmalek validityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers
AT karimshokry validityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers
AT wafyhamed validityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers
AT mohammedabdelnaser validityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers
AT ashrafaboubakr validityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers
AT samehabouelenin validityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers
AT mohamedali validityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers
AT mohamedmostafa validityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers
AT mahmoudabouokada validityevaluationofdifferent16srrnageneprimersforhelicobacterdetectionurgentlyrequestingtodesignnewspecificprimers