Exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability: protocol for a realist synthesis

Abstract Background Within the Learning Health System (LHS) model, learning routines, including evaluation, allow for continuous incremental change to take place. Within these learning routines, evaluation assists in problem identification, data collection, and data transformation into contextualize...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marissa Bird, Élizabeth Côté-Boileau, Walter P. Wodchis, Lianne Jeffs, Maura MacPhee, James Shaw, Tujuanna Austin, Frances Bruno, Megan Bhalla, Carolyn Steele Gray
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-10-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02348-5
_version_ 1797453727980847104
author Marissa Bird
Élizabeth Côté-Boileau
Walter P. Wodchis
Lianne Jeffs
Maura MacPhee
James Shaw
Tujuanna Austin
Frances Bruno
Megan Bhalla
Carolyn Steele Gray
author_facet Marissa Bird
Élizabeth Côté-Boileau
Walter P. Wodchis
Lianne Jeffs
Maura MacPhee
James Shaw
Tujuanna Austin
Frances Bruno
Megan Bhalla
Carolyn Steele Gray
author_sort Marissa Bird
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Within the Learning Health System (LHS) model, learning routines, including evaluation, allow for continuous incremental change to take place. Within these learning routines, evaluation assists in problem identification, data collection, and data transformation into contextualized information, which is then re-applied to the LHS environment. Evaluation that catalyzes learning and improvement may also contribute to health innovation sustainability. However, there is little consensus as to why certain evaluations seem to support learning and sustainability, while others impede it. This realist synthesis seeks to understand the contextual factors and underlying mechanisms or drivers that best support health systems learning and sustainable innovation. Methods This synthesis will be guided by Pawson and colleagues’ 2005 and Emmel and colleagues’ 2018 guidelines for conducting realist syntheses. The review process will encompass five steps: (1) scoping the review, (2) building theories, (3) identifying the evidence, (4) evidence selection and appraisal, and (5) data extraction and synthesis. An Expert Committee comprised of leaders in evaluation, innovation, sustainability, and realist methodology will guide this synthesis. Review findings will be reported using the RAMESES guidelines. Discussion The use of a realist review will allow for exploration and theorizing about the contextual factors and underlying mechanisms that make evaluations ‘work’ (or ‘not work’) to support learning and sustainability. Depending on results, we will attempt to synthesize findings into a series of recommendations for evaluations with the intention to support health systems learning and sustainability. Finalized results will be presented at national and international conferences, as well as disseminated via a peer-reviewed publication. Systematic review registration This realist synthesis protocol has been registered with PROSPERO ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/  ID 382690).
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:27:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2cc47366ff6745b1a86f5557745bb31f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2046-4053
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:27:02Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Systematic Reviews
spelling doaj.art-2cc47366ff6745b1a86f5557745bb31f2023-11-26T12:28:46ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532023-10-011211810.1186/s13643-023-02348-5Exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability: protocol for a realist synthesisMarissa Bird0Élizabeth Côté-Boileau1Walter P. Wodchis2Lianne Jeffs3Maura MacPhee4James Shaw5Tujuanna Austin6Frances Bruno7Megan Bhalla8Carolyn Steele Gray9Institute for Better HealthDepartment of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, School of Public Health, University of MontrealInstitute for Better HealthScience of Care Institute, Sinai HealthNursing-Applied Sciences, University of British ColumbiaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of TorontoInstitute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (IHPME), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of TorontoInstitute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (IHPME), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of TorontoOPTI-Hex Lab, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of TorontoInstitute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation (IHPME), Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of TorontoAbstract Background Within the Learning Health System (LHS) model, learning routines, including evaluation, allow for continuous incremental change to take place. Within these learning routines, evaluation assists in problem identification, data collection, and data transformation into contextualized information, which is then re-applied to the LHS environment. Evaluation that catalyzes learning and improvement may also contribute to health innovation sustainability. However, there is little consensus as to why certain evaluations seem to support learning and sustainability, while others impede it. This realist synthesis seeks to understand the contextual factors and underlying mechanisms or drivers that best support health systems learning and sustainable innovation. Methods This synthesis will be guided by Pawson and colleagues’ 2005 and Emmel and colleagues’ 2018 guidelines for conducting realist syntheses. The review process will encompass five steps: (1) scoping the review, (2) building theories, (3) identifying the evidence, (4) evidence selection and appraisal, and (5) data extraction and synthesis. An Expert Committee comprised of leaders in evaluation, innovation, sustainability, and realist methodology will guide this synthesis. Review findings will be reported using the RAMESES guidelines. Discussion The use of a realist review will allow for exploration and theorizing about the contextual factors and underlying mechanisms that make evaluations ‘work’ (or ‘not work’) to support learning and sustainability. Depending on results, we will attempt to synthesize findings into a series of recommendations for evaluations with the intention to support health systems learning and sustainability. Finalized results will be presented at national and international conferences, as well as disseminated via a peer-reviewed publication. Systematic review registration This realist synthesis protocol has been registered with PROSPERO ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/  ID 382690).https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02348-5Realist synthesisEvaluationLearningLearning health systemsInnovationSustainability
spellingShingle Marissa Bird
Élizabeth Côté-Boileau
Walter P. Wodchis
Lianne Jeffs
Maura MacPhee
James Shaw
Tujuanna Austin
Frances Bruno
Megan Bhalla
Carolyn Steele Gray
Exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability: protocol for a realist synthesis
Systematic Reviews
Realist synthesis
Evaluation
Learning
Learning health systems
Innovation
Sustainability
title Exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability: protocol for a realist synthesis
title_full Exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability: protocol for a realist synthesis
title_fullStr Exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability: protocol for a realist synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability: protocol for a realist synthesis
title_short Exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability: protocol for a realist synthesis
title_sort exploring the impact of evaluation on learning and health innovation sustainability protocol for a realist synthesis
topic Realist synthesis
Evaluation
Learning
Learning health systems
Innovation
Sustainability
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02348-5
work_keys_str_mv AT marissabird exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis
AT elizabethcoteboileau exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis
AT walterpwodchis exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis
AT liannejeffs exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis
AT mauramacphee exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis
AT jamesshaw exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis
AT tujuannaaustin exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis
AT francesbruno exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis
AT meganbhalla exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis
AT carolynsteelegray exploringtheimpactofevaluationonlearningandhealthinnovationsustainabilityprotocolforarealistsynthesis