Optimization of the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Cabernet Sauvignon Grape Pomace from Querétaro, Mexico, Using MSPD

Red wine contains polyphenols which are extracted during the winemaking process. However, winemaking is not an extraction; therefore, the resulting byproducts still have a substantial polyphenol content. The aim of this study was to compare two methods for the extraction of phenolic compounds: macer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tellez-Robles Daniela, López-Cortez Ma. del Socorro, Santoyo-Tepole Fortunata, Rosales-Martínez Patricia, García-Ochoa Felipe, Hernández-Botello Mayuric Teresa, Salgdo-Cruz María de la Paz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-12-01
Series:Separations
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8739/11/1/13
_version_ 1797342569848373248
author Tellez-Robles Daniela
López-Cortez Ma. del Socorro
Santoyo-Tepole Fortunata
Rosales-Martínez Patricia
García-Ochoa Felipe
Hernández-Botello Mayuric Teresa
Salgdo-Cruz María de la Paz
author_facet Tellez-Robles Daniela
López-Cortez Ma. del Socorro
Santoyo-Tepole Fortunata
Rosales-Martínez Patricia
García-Ochoa Felipe
Hernández-Botello Mayuric Teresa
Salgdo-Cruz María de la Paz
author_sort Tellez-Robles Daniela
collection DOAJ
description Red wine contains polyphenols which are extracted during the winemaking process. However, winemaking is not an extraction; therefore, the resulting byproducts still have a substantial polyphenol content. The aim of this study was to compare two methods for the extraction of phenolic compounds: maceration and matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD). Grape pomace (<i>Vitis vinifera</i> var. Cabernet Sauvignon) from a winery in Querétaro, Mexico was used. The optimal conditions for both methods were identified. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity were the response variables. A central composite design was used (Minitab 17) for the extraction by maceration. The maceration time (1, 4, 12, 20, and 24 h) and the ratio of ethanol (50 to 80%) acidified with 1% HCl were the two factors studied. For the MSPD extraction, sea sand was used as a dispersant, and a 2<sup>2</sup> factorial design was employed for the evaluation, with the elution volume and the ratio of sample/dispersant being the two factors analyzed. The optimal extraction method was MSPD with 96 mL (acidified ethanol) as the elution volume and a 1:2 ratio of sample/dispersant. Using these conditions, 14.01 ± 0.19 mMol TEAC/100 g db (Trolox equivalent of antioxidant capacity) of grape pomace was obtained, whereas the total phenolic content was 2836.73 ± 41.90 mg GAE/100 g db. These values are greater than those obtained by maceration. These conditions are close to those predicted by the model (analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a level of significance of 5% (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and a Tukey comparison test for determining significant differences in the comparison of results).
first_indexed 2024-03-08T10:35:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2de7c60f2a85458dbeb6ed80561ce836
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-8739
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T10:35:12Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Separations
spelling doaj.art-2de7c60f2a85458dbeb6ed80561ce8362024-01-26T18:27:24ZengMDPI AGSeparations2297-87392023-12-011111310.3390/separations11010013Optimization of the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Cabernet Sauvignon Grape Pomace from Querétaro, Mexico, Using MSPDTellez-Robles Daniela0López-Cortez Ma. del Socorro1Santoyo-Tepole Fortunata2Rosales-Martínez Patricia3García-Ochoa Felipe4Hernández-Botello Mayuric Teresa5Salgdo-Cruz María de la Paz6Laboratorio de Investigación II, Departamento de Biofísica, Central de Instrumentación y Espectroscopía de Posgrado, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Colonia Casco de Santo Tomás, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 11340, MexicoLaboratorio de Investigación II, Departamento de Biofísica, Central de Instrumentación y Espectroscopía de Posgrado, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Colonia Casco de Santo Tomás, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 11340, MexicoLaboratorio de Investigación II, Departamento de Biofísica, Central de Instrumentación y Espectroscopía de Posgrado, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Colonia Casco de Santo Tomás, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 11340, MexicoLaboratorio de Investigación II, Departamento de Biofísica, Central de Instrumentación y Espectroscopía de Posgrado, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Colonia Casco de Santo Tomás, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 11340, MexicoLaboratorio de Investigación II, Departamento de Biofísica, Central de Instrumentación y Espectroscopía de Posgrado, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Colonia Casco de Santo Tomás, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 11340, MexicoLaboratorio de Investigación II, Departamento de Biofísica, Central de Instrumentación y Espectroscopía de Posgrado, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Colonia Casco de Santo Tomás, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 11340, MexicoLaboratorio de Investigación II, Departamento de Biofísica, Central de Instrumentación y Espectroscopía de Posgrado, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Colonia Casco de Santo Tomás, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo, Ciudad de Mexico C.P. 11340, MexicoRed wine contains polyphenols which are extracted during the winemaking process. However, winemaking is not an extraction; therefore, the resulting byproducts still have a substantial polyphenol content. The aim of this study was to compare two methods for the extraction of phenolic compounds: maceration and matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD). Grape pomace (<i>Vitis vinifera</i> var. Cabernet Sauvignon) from a winery in Querétaro, Mexico was used. The optimal conditions for both methods were identified. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity were the response variables. A central composite design was used (Minitab 17) for the extraction by maceration. The maceration time (1, 4, 12, 20, and 24 h) and the ratio of ethanol (50 to 80%) acidified with 1% HCl were the two factors studied. For the MSPD extraction, sea sand was used as a dispersant, and a 2<sup>2</sup> factorial design was employed for the evaluation, with the elution volume and the ratio of sample/dispersant being the two factors analyzed. The optimal extraction method was MSPD with 96 mL (acidified ethanol) as the elution volume and a 1:2 ratio of sample/dispersant. Using these conditions, 14.01 ± 0.19 mMol TEAC/100 g db (Trolox equivalent of antioxidant capacity) of grape pomace was obtained, whereas the total phenolic content was 2836.73 ± 41.90 mg GAE/100 g db. These values are greater than those obtained by maceration. These conditions are close to those predicted by the model (analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a level of significance of 5% (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and a Tukey comparison test for determining significant differences in the comparison of results).https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8739/11/1/13phenolic contentantioxidant capacityoptimal extraction conditionsMSPD extractionwinemaking waste
spellingShingle Tellez-Robles Daniela
López-Cortez Ma. del Socorro
Santoyo-Tepole Fortunata
Rosales-Martínez Patricia
García-Ochoa Felipe
Hernández-Botello Mayuric Teresa
Salgdo-Cruz María de la Paz
Optimization of the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Cabernet Sauvignon Grape Pomace from Querétaro, Mexico, Using MSPD
Separations
phenolic content
antioxidant capacity
optimal extraction conditions
MSPD extraction
winemaking waste
title Optimization of the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Cabernet Sauvignon Grape Pomace from Querétaro, Mexico, Using MSPD
title_full Optimization of the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Cabernet Sauvignon Grape Pomace from Querétaro, Mexico, Using MSPD
title_fullStr Optimization of the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Cabernet Sauvignon Grape Pomace from Querétaro, Mexico, Using MSPD
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Cabernet Sauvignon Grape Pomace from Querétaro, Mexico, Using MSPD
title_short Optimization of the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Cabernet Sauvignon Grape Pomace from Querétaro, Mexico, Using MSPD
title_sort optimization of the extraction of bioactive compounds from cabernet sauvignon grape pomace from queretaro mexico using mspd
topic phenolic content
antioxidant capacity
optimal extraction conditions
MSPD extraction
winemaking waste
url https://www.mdpi.com/2297-8739/11/1/13
work_keys_str_mv AT tellezroblesdaniela optimizationoftheextractionofbioactivecompoundsfromcabernetsauvignongrapepomacefromqueretaromexicousingmspd
AT lopezcortezmadelsocorro optimizationoftheextractionofbioactivecompoundsfromcabernetsauvignongrapepomacefromqueretaromexicousingmspd
AT santoyotepolefortunata optimizationoftheextractionofbioactivecompoundsfromcabernetsauvignongrapepomacefromqueretaromexicousingmspd
AT rosalesmartinezpatricia optimizationoftheextractionofbioactivecompoundsfromcabernetsauvignongrapepomacefromqueretaromexicousingmspd
AT garciaochoafelipe optimizationoftheextractionofbioactivecompoundsfromcabernetsauvignongrapepomacefromqueretaromexicousingmspd
AT hernandezbotellomayuricteresa optimizationoftheextractionofbioactivecompoundsfromcabernetsauvignongrapepomacefromqueretaromexicousingmspd
AT salgdocruzmariadelapaz optimizationoftheextractionofbioactivecompoundsfromcabernetsauvignongrapepomacefromqueretaromexicousingmspd