The TRIPLE Change Framework: Merging Theories of Intersectional Power, Learning, and Change to Enable Just, Equitable, Diverse, and Inclusive Engineering Education

Background: Despite many calls for change, and especially change aligned to diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (DEIJ) goals, engineering continues to show disparities in the opportunities, experiences, and outcomes of women and people from groups historically marginalized in these fields. In...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vanessa Svihla, Susannah C. Davis, Nadia N. Kellam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: VT Publishing 2023-09-01
Series:Studies in Engineering Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://account.seejournal.org/index.php/vt-j-see/article/view/87
_version_ 1797655967234523136
author Vanessa Svihla
Susannah C. Davis
Nadia N. Kellam
author_facet Vanessa Svihla
Susannah C. Davis
Nadia N. Kellam
author_sort Vanessa Svihla
collection DOAJ
description Background: Despite many calls for change, and especially change aligned to diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (DEIJ) goals, engineering continues to show disparities in the opportunities, experiences, and outcomes of women and people from groups historically marginalized in these fields. In response, institutions have traditionally used change frameworks to both understand and create reform at program, department, or college levels. However, when aiming at DEIJ goals, change frameworks alone do not lead to the desired transformations of systems. Purpose: In this theoretical paper, we develop an integrated framework that draws from three theoretical domains to guide systemic, equity-focused transformation in engineering education. We argue knowledge from three domains—intersectional power, learning, and change—is necessary to account for and address the complexity of DEIJ change projects. This complexity requires a framework that sheds light on interrelated embodiments of power relations, guidance on how to change, including how and why people learn and engage in new practices. Scope: To illustrate the need for and value of such integration, we examine how prior researchers have used theories of power, change, and learning. In doing so, we present a framework for how integration across these domains can occur. In the domain of change, we identified papers on diffusion of innovations and communities of practice. In learning, we identified papers on distributed practice and legitimate peripheral participation. We examined how these papers utilized critical theories of intersectional power, the third domain, in tandem with these theories. We also explored how the choice of a theory (within the domains) can help or hinder the attainment of systematic, equity-focused transformation. Discussion/Conclusion: We drew the three domains together to consider how these, when integrated in the Theories and Research on Intersectional Power, Learning, and Evolutionary Change (TRIPLE Change) Framework, provide a more comprehensive means to envision, guide, and characterize DEIJ change efforts. By integrating learning, change, and intersectional power theories, we increase the capacity of our analyses of systems and open new possibilities for creating more equitable and just systems.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T17:22:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2e10c419c1ef4f4abad0bd5dba1d9a66
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2690-5450
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T17:22:23Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher VT Publishing
record_format Article
series Studies in Engineering Education
spelling doaj.art-2e10c419c1ef4f4abad0bd5dba1d9a662023-10-19T08:12:51ZengVT PublishingStudies in Engineering Education2690-54502023-09-014238–6338–6310.21061/see.8784The TRIPLE Change Framework: Merging Theories of Intersectional Power, Learning, and Change to Enable Just, Equitable, Diverse, and Inclusive Engineering EducationVanessa Svihla0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4342-6178Susannah C. Davis1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4610-8052Nadia N. Kellam2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9327-1226University of New MexicoUniversity of New MexicoArizona State UniversityBackground: Despite many calls for change, and especially change aligned to diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (DEIJ) goals, engineering continues to show disparities in the opportunities, experiences, and outcomes of women and people from groups historically marginalized in these fields. In response, institutions have traditionally used change frameworks to both understand and create reform at program, department, or college levels. However, when aiming at DEIJ goals, change frameworks alone do not lead to the desired transformations of systems. Purpose: In this theoretical paper, we develop an integrated framework that draws from three theoretical domains to guide systemic, equity-focused transformation in engineering education. We argue knowledge from three domains—intersectional power, learning, and change—is necessary to account for and address the complexity of DEIJ change projects. This complexity requires a framework that sheds light on interrelated embodiments of power relations, guidance on how to change, including how and why people learn and engage in new practices. Scope: To illustrate the need for and value of such integration, we examine how prior researchers have used theories of power, change, and learning. In doing so, we present a framework for how integration across these domains can occur. In the domain of change, we identified papers on diffusion of innovations and communities of practice. In learning, we identified papers on distributed practice and legitimate peripheral participation. We examined how these papers utilized critical theories of intersectional power, the third domain, in tandem with these theories. We also explored how the choice of a theory (within the domains) can help or hinder the attainment of systematic, equity-focused transformation. Discussion/Conclusion: We drew the three domains together to consider how these, when integrated in the Theories and Research on Intersectional Power, Learning, and Evolutionary Change (TRIPLE Change) Framework, provide a more comprehensive means to envision, guide, and characterize DEIJ change efforts. By integrating learning, change, and intersectional power theories, we increase the capacity of our analyses of systems and open new possibilities for creating more equitable and just systems.https://account.seejournal.org/index.php/vt-j-see/article/view/87higher educationorganizational changelearning theoryintersectionalitypower
spellingShingle Vanessa Svihla
Susannah C. Davis
Nadia N. Kellam
The TRIPLE Change Framework: Merging Theories of Intersectional Power, Learning, and Change to Enable Just, Equitable, Diverse, and Inclusive Engineering Education
Studies in Engineering Education
higher education
organizational change
learning theory
intersectionality
power
title The TRIPLE Change Framework: Merging Theories of Intersectional Power, Learning, and Change to Enable Just, Equitable, Diverse, and Inclusive Engineering Education
title_full The TRIPLE Change Framework: Merging Theories of Intersectional Power, Learning, and Change to Enable Just, Equitable, Diverse, and Inclusive Engineering Education
title_fullStr The TRIPLE Change Framework: Merging Theories of Intersectional Power, Learning, and Change to Enable Just, Equitable, Diverse, and Inclusive Engineering Education
title_full_unstemmed The TRIPLE Change Framework: Merging Theories of Intersectional Power, Learning, and Change to Enable Just, Equitable, Diverse, and Inclusive Engineering Education
title_short The TRIPLE Change Framework: Merging Theories of Intersectional Power, Learning, and Change to Enable Just, Equitable, Diverse, and Inclusive Engineering Education
title_sort triple change framework merging theories of intersectional power learning and change to enable just equitable diverse and inclusive engineering education
topic higher education
organizational change
learning theory
intersectionality
power
url https://account.seejournal.org/index.php/vt-j-see/article/view/87
work_keys_str_mv AT vanessasvihla thetriplechangeframeworkmergingtheoriesofintersectionalpowerlearningandchangetoenablejustequitablediverseandinclusiveengineeringeducation
AT susannahcdavis thetriplechangeframeworkmergingtheoriesofintersectionalpowerlearningandchangetoenablejustequitablediverseandinclusiveengineeringeducation
AT nadiankellam thetriplechangeframeworkmergingtheoriesofintersectionalpowerlearningandchangetoenablejustequitablediverseandinclusiveengineeringeducation
AT vanessasvihla triplechangeframeworkmergingtheoriesofintersectionalpowerlearningandchangetoenablejustequitablediverseandinclusiveengineeringeducation
AT susannahcdavis triplechangeframeworkmergingtheoriesofintersectionalpowerlearningandchangetoenablejustequitablediverseandinclusiveengineeringeducation
AT nadiankellam triplechangeframeworkmergingtheoriesofintersectionalpowerlearningandchangetoenablejustequitablediverseandinclusiveengineeringeducation