Foreword

The development by law students of an ability to engage in critical thinking is highly valued within both the legal academy and the legal profession because it enhances the ability of law students to think clearly, objectively and independently, whether they are seeking to understand legal doctrine,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabrielle Appleby, Alexander Reilly, Sean Brennan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bond University 2015-01-01
Series:Legal Education Review
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6315
_version_ 1797254226830688256
author Gabrielle Appleby
Alexander Reilly
Sean Brennan
author_facet Gabrielle Appleby
Alexander Reilly
Sean Brennan
author_sort Gabrielle Appleby
collection DOAJ
description The development by law students of an ability to engage in critical thinking is highly valued within both the legal academy and the legal profession because it enhances the ability of law students to think clearly, objectively and independently, whether they are seeking to understand legal doctrine, solve legal problems or improve access to justice. This article draws upon the authors’ experiences as law teachers and upon the critical thinking literature to present detailed criteria for the measurement of an ability to engage in critical thinking about law, and then applies those criteria in the design of a marking rubric that facilitates a whole-of-curriculum approach to the development of critical thinking skills by law students.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T21:46:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-301af248ca2b4d4683917f35c5ccaf94
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1033-2839
1839-3713
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T21:46:36Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Bond University
record_format Article
series Legal Education Review
spelling doaj.art-301af248ca2b4d4683917f35c5ccaf942024-03-20T22:12:51ZengBond UniversityLegal Education Review1033-28391839-37132015-01-01252ForewordGabrielle ApplebyAlexander ReillySean BrennanThe development by law students of an ability to engage in critical thinking is highly valued within both the legal academy and the legal profession because it enhances the ability of law students to think clearly, objectively and independently, whether they are seeking to understand legal doctrine, solve legal problems or improve access to justice. This article draws upon the authors’ experiences as law teachers and upon the critical thinking literature to present detailed criteria for the measurement of an ability to engage in critical thinking about law, and then applies those criteria in the design of a marking rubric that facilitates a whole-of-curriculum approach to the development of critical thinking skills by law students.https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6315
spellingShingle Gabrielle Appleby
Alexander Reilly
Sean Brennan
Foreword
Legal Education Review
title Foreword
title_full Foreword
title_fullStr Foreword
title_full_unstemmed Foreword
title_short Foreword
title_sort foreword
url https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6315
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielleappleby foreword
AT alexanderreilly foreword
AT seanbrennan foreword