Innate Immune Sensing of Viruses and Its Consequences for the Central Nervous System

Viral infections remain a global public health concern and cause a severe societal and economic burden. At the organismal level, the innate immune system is essential for the detection of viruses and constitutes the first line of defense. Viral components are sensed by host pattern recognition recep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hina Singh, Jeffrey Koury, Marcus Kaul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:Viruses
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/2/170
_version_ 1829091140064772096
author Hina Singh
Jeffrey Koury
Marcus Kaul
author_facet Hina Singh
Jeffrey Koury
Marcus Kaul
author_sort Hina Singh
collection DOAJ
description Viral infections remain a global public health concern and cause a severe societal and economic burden. At the organismal level, the innate immune system is essential for the detection of viruses and constitutes the first line of defense. Viral components are sensed by host pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). PRRs can be further classified based on their localization into Toll-like receptors (TLRs), C-type lectin receptors (CLR), retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs) and cytosolic DNA sensors (CDS). TLR and RLR signaling results in production of type I interferons (IFNα and -β) and pro-inflammatory cytokines in a cell-specific manner, whereas NLR signaling leads to the production of interleukin-1 family proteins. On the other hand, CLRs are capable of sensing glycans present in viral pathogens, which can induce phagocytic, endocytic, antimicrobial, and pro- inflammatory responses. Peripheral immune sensing of viruses and the ensuing cytokine response can significantly affect the central nervous system (CNS). But viruses can also directly enter the CNS via a multitude of routes, such as the nasal epithelium, along nerve fibers connecting to the periphery and as cargo of infiltrating infected cells passing through the blood brain barrier, triggering innate immune sensing and cytokine responses directly in the CNS. Here, we review mechanisms of viral immune sensing and currently recognized consequences for the CNS of innate immune responses to viruses.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T03:52:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3221d3b7a4ad4346bc1d9fafd8b2665d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4915
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T03:52:17Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Viruses
spelling doaj.art-3221d3b7a4ad4346bc1d9fafd8b2665d2023-12-03T14:25:54ZengMDPI AGViruses1999-49152021-01-0113217010.3390/v13020170Innate Immune Sensing of Viruses and Its Consequences for the Central Nervous SystemHina Singh0Jeffrey Koury1Marcus Kaul2Division of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USADivision of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USADivision of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USAViral infections remain a global public health concern and cause a severe societal and economic burden. At the organismal level, the innate immune system is essential for the detection of viruses and constitutes the first line of defense. Viral components are sensed by host pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). PRRs can be further classified based on their localization into Toll-like receptors (TLRs), C-type lectin receptors (CLR), retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs) and cytosolic DNA sensors (CDS). TLR and RLR signaling results in production of type I interferons (IFNα and -β) and pro-inflammatory cytokines in a cell-specific manner, whereas NLR signaling leads to the production of interleukin-1 family proteins. On the other hand, CLRs are capable of sensing glycans present in viral pathogens, which can induce phagocytic, endocytic, antimicrobial, and pro- inflammatory responses. Peripheral immune sensing of viruses and the ensuing cytokine response can significantly affect the central nervous system (CNS). But viruses can also directly enter the CNS via a multitude of routes, such as the nasal epithelium, along nerve fibers connecting to the periphery and as cargo of infiltrating infected cells passing through the blood brain barrier, triggering innate immune sensing and cytokine responses directly in the CNS. Here, we review mechanisms of viral immune sensing and currently recognized consequences for the CNS of innate immune responses to viruses.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/2/170toll-like receptorC-type lectin receptorsRIG-I-like receptorsNOD-like receptorsinflammasomeinterferons
spellingShingle Hina Singh
Jeffrey Koury
Marcus Kaul
Innate Immune Sensing of Viruses and Its Consequences for the Central Nervous System
Viruses
toll-like receptor
C-type lectin receptors
RIG-I-like receptors
NOD-like receptors
inflammasome
interferons
title Innate Immune Sensing of Viruses and Its Consequences for the Central Nervous System
title_full Innate Immune Sensing of Viruses and Its Consequences for the Central Nervous System
title_fullStr Innate Immune Sensing of Viruses and Its Consequences for the Central Nervous System
title_full_unstemmed Innate Immune Sensing of Viruses and Its Consequences for the Central Nervous System
title_short Innate Immune Sensing of Viruses and Its Consequences for the Central Nervous System
title_sort innate immune sensing of viruses and its consequences for the central nervous system
topic toll-like receptor
C-type lectin receptors
RIG-I-like receptors
NOD-like receptors
inflammasome
interferons
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/2/170
work_keys_str_mv AT hinasingh innateimmunesensingofvirusesanditsconsequencesforthecentralnervoussystem
AT jeffreykoury innateimmunesensingofvirusesanditsconsequencesforthecentralnervoussystem
AT marcuskaul innateimmunesensingofvirusesanditsconsequencesforthecentralnervoussystem