Evaluation of commercial kits for isolation and bisulfite conversion of circulating cell-free tumor DNA from blood

Abstract Background DNA methylation biomarkers in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) have great clinical potential for cancer management. Most methods for DNA methylation analysis require bisulfite conversion, causing DNA degradation and loss. This is particularly challenging for cfDNA, which is natu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stine H. Kresse, Sara Brandt-Winge, Heidi Pharo, Bjørnar T. B. Flatin, Marine Jeanmougin, Hege Marie Vedeld, Guro E. Lind
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-09-01
Series:Clinical Epigenetics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-023-01563-0
_version_ 1797452157367091200
author Stine H. Kresse
Sara Brandt-Winge
Heidi Pharo
Bjørnar T. B. Flatin
Marine Jeanmougin
Hege Marie Vedeld
Guro E. Lind
author_facet Stine H. Kresse
Sara Brandt-Winge
Heidi Pharo
Bjørnar T. B. Flatin
Marine Jeanmougin
Hege Marie Vedeld
Guro E. Lind
author_sort Stine H. Kresse
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background DNA methylation biomarkers in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) have great clinical potential for cancer management. Most methods for DNA methylation analysis require bisulfite conversion, causing DNA degradation and loss. This is particularly challenging for cfDNA, which is naturally fragmented and normally present in low amounts. The aim of the present study was to identify an optimal combination of cfDNA isolation and bisulfite conversion kits for downstream analysis of DNA methylation biomarkers in plasma. Results Of the five tested bisulfite conversion kits (EpiJET Bisulfite Conversion Kit, EpiTect Plus DNA Bisulfite Kit (EpiTect), EZ DNA Methylation-Direct Kit, Imprint DNA Modification Kit (Imprint) and Premium Bisulfite Kit), the highest and lowest DNA yield and recovery were achieved using the EpiTect kit and the Imprint kit, respectively, with more than double the amount of DNA for the EpiTect kit. Of the three tested cfDNA isolation kits (Maxwell RSC ccfDNA Plasma Kit, QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (CNA) and QIAamp MinElute ccfDNA Mini Kit), the CNA kit yielded around twice as much cfDNA compared to the two others kits, although with more high molecular weight DNA present. When comparing various combinations of cfDNA isolation kits and bisulfite conversion kits, the CNA kit and the EpiTect kit were identified as the best-performing combination, resulting in the highest yield of bisulfite converted cfDNA from normal plasma, as measured by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). As a proof of principle, this kit combination was used to process plasma samples from 13 colorectal cancer patients for subsequent ddPCR methylation analysis of BCAT1 and IKZF1. Methylation of BCAT1 and/or IKZF1 was identified in 6/10 (60%) stage IV patients and 1/3 (33%) stage III patients. Conclusions Based on a thorough evaluation of five bisulfite conversion kits and three cfDNA isolation kits, both individually and in combination, the CNA kit and the EpiTect kit were identified as the best-performing kit combination, with highest DNA yield and recovery across a range of DNA input amounts. The combination was successfully used for detection of clinically relevant DNA methylation biomarkers in plasma from cancer patients.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:04:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3533e452970e4e5a9487c7ab1707a11a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1868-7083
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:04:42Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Clinical Epigenetics
spelling doaj.art-3533e452970e4e5a9487c7ab1707a11a2023-11-26T13:41:35ZengBMCClinical Epigenetics1868-70832023-09-0115111410.1186/s13148-023-01563-0Evaluation of commercial kits for isolation and bisulfite conversion of circulating cell-free tumor DNA from bloodStine H. Kresse0Sara Brandt-Winge1Heidi Pharo2Bjørnar T. B. Flatin3Marine Jeanmougin4Hege Marie Vedeld5Guro E. Lind6Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University HospitalDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University HospitalDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University HospitalDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University HospitalDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University HospitalDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University HospitalDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University HospitalAbstract Background DNA methylation biomarkers in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) have great clinical potential for cancer management. Most methods for DNA methylation analysis require bisulfite conversion, causing DNA degradation and loss. This is particularly challenging for cfDNA, which is naturally fragmented and normally present in low amounts. The aim of the present study was to identify an optimal combination of cfDNA isolation and bisulfite conversion kits for downstream analysis of DNA methylation biomarkers in plasma. Results Of the five tested bisulfite conversion kits (EpiJET Bisulfite Conversion Kit, EpiTect Plus DNA Bisulfite Kit (EpiTect), EZ DNA Methylation-Direct Kit, Imprint DNA Modification Kit (Imprint) and Premium Bisulfite Kit), the highest and lowest DNA yield and recovery were achieved using the EpiTect kit and the Imprint kit, respectively, with more than double the amount of DNA for the EpiTect kit. Of the three tested cfDNA isolation kits (Maxwell RSC ccfDNA Plasma Kit, QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (CNA) and QIAamp MinElute ccfDNA Mini Kit), the CNA kit yielded around twice as much cfDNA compared to the two others kits, although with more high molecular weight DNA present. When comparing various combinations of cfDNA isolation kits and bisulfite conversion kits, the CNA kit and the EpiTect kit were identified as the best-performing combination, resulting in the highest yield of bisulfite converted cfDNA from normal plasma, as measured by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). As a proof of principle, this kit combination was used to process plasma samples from 13 colorectal cancer patients for subsequent ddPCR methylation analysis of BCAT1 and IKZF1. Methylation of BCAT1 and/or IKZF1 was identified in 6/10 (60%) stage IV patients and 1/3 (33%) stage III patients. Conclusions Based on a thorough evaluation of five bisulfite conversion kits and three cfDNA isolation kits, both individually and in combination, the CNA kit and the EpiTect kit were identified as the best-performing kit combination, with highest DNA yield and recovery across a range of DNA input amounts. The combination was successfully used for detection of clinically relevant DNA methylation biomarkers in plasma from cancer patients.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-023-01563-0Liquid biopsyCirculating cell-free tumor DNAcfDNActDNAPlasmacfDNA isolation
spellingShingle Stine H. Kresse
Sara Brandt-Winge
Heidi Pharo
Bjørnar T. B. Flatin
Marine Jeanmougin
Hege Marie Vedeld
Guro E. Lind
Evaluation of commercial kits for isolation and bisulfite conversion of circulating cell-free tumor DNA from blood
Clinical Epigenetics
Liquid biopsy
Circulating cell-free tumor DNA
cfDNA
ctDNA
Plasma
cfDNA isolation
title Evaluation of commercial kits for isolation and bisulfite conversion of circulating cell-free tumor DNA from blood
title_full Evaluation of commercial kits for isolation and bisulfite conversion of circulating cell-free tumor DNA from blood
title_fullStr Evaluation of commercial kits for isolation and bisulfite conversion of circulating cell-free tumor DNA from blood
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of commercial kits for isolation and bisulfite conversion of circulating cell-free tumor DNA from blood
title_short Evaluation of commercial kits for isolation and bisulfite conversion of circulating cell-free tumor DNA from blood
title_sort evaluation of commercial kits for isolation and bisulfite conversion of circulating cell free tumor dna from blood
topic Liquid biopsy
Circulating cell-free tumor DNA
cfDNA
ctDNA
Plasma
cfDNA isolation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-023-01563-0
work_keys_str_mv AT stinehkresse evaluationofcommercialkitsforisolationandbisulfiteconversionofcirculatingcellfreetumordnafromblood
AT sarabrandtwinge evaluationofcommercialkitsforisolationandbisulfiteconversionofcirculatingcellfreetumordnafromblood
AT heidipharo evaluationofcommercialkitsforisolationandbisulfiteconversionofcirculatingcellfreetumordnafromblood
AT bjørnartbflatin evaluationofcommercialkitsforisolationandbisulfiteconversionofcirculatingcellfreetumordnafromblood
AT marinejeanmougin evaluationofcommercialkitsforisolationandbisulfiteconversionofcirculatingcellfreetumordnafromblood
AT hegemarievedeld evaluationofcommercialkitsforisolationandbisulfiteconversionofcirculatingcellfreetumordnafromblood
AT guroelind evaluationofcommercialkitsforisolationandbisulfiteconversionofcirculatingcellfreetumordnafromblood