Neurobiological mechanisms for nonverbal IQ tests: implications for instruction of nonverbal children with autism

Traditionally, the neurological correlates of IQ test questions are characterized qualitatively in terms of ‘control of attention’ and ‘working memory.’ In this report we attempt to characterize each IQ test question quantitatively by two factors: a) the number of disparate objects that have to be i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrey Vyshedskiy, Rita Dunn, Irene Piryatinsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2017-04-01
Series:Research Ideas and Outcomes
Online Access:https://riojournal.com/article/13239/
_version_ 1818758813697703936
author Andrey Vyshedskiy
Rita Dunn
Irene Piryatinsky
author_facet Andrey Vyshedskiy
Rita Dunn
Irene Piryatinsky
author_sort Andrey Vyshedskiy
collection DOAJ
description Traditionally, the neurological correlates of IQ test questions are characterized qualitatively in terms of ‘control of attention’ and ‘working memory.’ In this report we attempt to characterize each IQ test question quantitatively by two factors: a) the number of disparate objects that have to be imagined in concert in order to solve the problem and, b) the amount of recruited posterior cortex territory. With such a classification, an IQ test can be understood on a neuronal level and a subject’s IQ score could be interpreted in terms of specific neurological mechanisms available to the subject. Here we present the results of an analysis of the three most popular nonverbal IQ tests: Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (TONI-4), Standard Raven's Progressive Matrices, and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-V). Our analysis shows that approximately half of all questions (52±0.02%) are limited to mental computations involving only a single object; these easier questions are found towards the beginning of each test. More difficult questions located towards the end of each test rely on mental synthesis of several disparate objects and the number of objects involved in computations gradually increases with question difficulty. These more challenging questions require the organization of wider posterior cortex networks by the lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC). This conclusion is in line with neuroimaging studies showing that activation level of the lateral PFC and the posterior cortex positively correlates with task difficulty. This analysis has direct implications for brain pathophysiology and, specifically, for therapeutic interventions for children with language impairment, most notably for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and other developmental disorders.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T06:32:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-35443af3e7eb4c1c9c40ad4ab570f0c3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2367-7163
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T06:32:48Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format Article
series Research Ideas and Outcomes
spelling doaj.art-35443af3e7eb4c1c9c40ad4ab570f0c32022-12-21T21:17:52ZengPensoft PublishersResearch Ideas and Outcomes2367-71632017-04-01314010.3897/rio.3.e1323913239Neurobiological mechanisms for nonverbal IQ tests: implications for instruction of nonverbal children with autismAndrey Vyshedskiy0Rita Dunn1Irene Piryatinsky2Boston UniversityImagiRation LLCHarvard Medical SchoolTraditionally, the neurological correlates of IQ test questions are characterized qualitatively in terms of ‘control of attention’ and ‘working memory.’ In this report we attempt to characterize each IQ test question quantitatively by two factors: a) the number of disparate objects that have to be imagined in concert in order to solve the problem and, b) the amount of recruited posterior cortex territory. With such a classification, an IQ test can be understood on a neuronal level and a subject’s IQ score could be interpreted in terms of specific neurological mechanisms available to the subject. Here we present the results of an analysis of the three most popular nonverbal IQ tests: Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (TONI-4), Standard Raven's Progressive Matrices, and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-V). Our analysis shows that approximately half of all questions (52±0.02%) are limited to mental computations involving only a single object; these easier questions are found towards the beginning of each test. More difficult questions located towards the end of each test rely on mental synthesis of several disparate objects and the number of objects involved in computations gradually increases with question difficulty. These more challenging questions require the organization of wider posterior cortex networks by the lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC). This conclusion is in line with neuroimaging studies showing that activation level of the lateral PFC and the posterior cortex positively correlates with task difficulty. This analysis has direct implications for brain pathophysiology and, specifically, for therapeutic interventions for children with language impairment, most notably for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and other developmental disorders.https://riojournal.com/article/13239/
spellingShingle Andrey Vyshedskiy
Rita Dunn
Irene Piryatinsky
Neurobiological mechanisms for nonverbal IQ tests: implications for instruction of nonverbal children with autism
Research Ideas and Outcomes
title Neurobiological mechanisms for nonverbal IQ tests: implications for instruction of nonverbal children with autism
title_full Neurobiological mechanisms for nonverbal IQ tests: implications for instruction of nonverbal children with autism
title_fullStr Neurobiological mechanisms for nonverbal IQ tests: implications for instruction of nonverbal children with autism
title_full_unstemmed Neurobiological mechanisms for nonverbal IQ tests: implications for instruction of nonverbal children with autism
title_short Neurobiological mechanisms for nonverbal IQ tests: implications for instruction of nonverbal children with autism
title_sort neurobiological mechanisms for nonverbal iq tests implications for instruction of nonverbal children with autism
url https://riojournal.com/article/13239/
work_keys_str_mv AT andreyvyshedskiy neurobiologicalmechanismsfornonverbaliqtestsimplicationsforinstructionofnonverbalchildrenwithautism
AT ritadunn neurobiologicalmechanismsfornonverbaliqtestsimplicationsforinstructionofnonverbalchildrenwithautism
AT irenepiryatinsky neurobiologicalmechanismsfornonverbaliqtestsimplicationsforinstructionofnonverbalchildrenwithautism