Segregated schools of thought: The Bantu Education Act (1953) revisited
Various political parties, civil rights groups and columnists support the view that one of South Africa’s foremost socio-economic challenges is overcoming the scarring legacy which the Bantu Education Act of 1953 left on the face of the country. In light of this challenge, a need arose to revisit th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
AOSIS
2017-12-01
|
| Series: | Contree |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://newcontree.org.za/index.php/nc/article/view/90 |
| _version_ | 1797808804883070976 |
|---|---|
| author | Nadine Moore |
| author_facet | Nadine Moore |
| author_sort | Nadine Moore |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Various political parties, civil rights groups and columnists support the view that one of South Africa’s foremost socio-economic challenges is overcoming the scarring legacy which the Bantu Education Act of 1953 left on the face of the country. In light of this challenge, a need arose to revisit the position and place of Bantu Education historiography in the current contested interpretation of its legacy.
It is apparent from the plethora of literature available on this topic that academics are not in agreement about whether or not the passing of the 1953 Act was a watershed moment in marginalising education for black pupils. On the one hand, it would seem that the general consensus is that the 1953 Act was indeed a turning point in the formalisation of education reserved for pupils of colour – thus a largely “traditional” view. On the other hand, the Marxist school, as coined by P Christie and C Collins, argues that securing a cheap, unskilled labour force was already on the agenda of the white electorate preceding the formalisation of the Act.
The aim of this article is two-fold. Firstly, to contextualise these two stances historically; and secondly and more chiefly, to examine the varying approaches regarding the rationalisation behind Bantu Education by testing these approaches against the rationale apparent in primary sources in the form of parliamentary debates and contemporary newspaper articles. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T06:43:05Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-35c4d86736d24ef996b3e2e1913dd396 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0379-9867 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T06:43:05Z |
| publishDate | 2017-12-01 |
| publisher | AOSIS |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Contree |
| spelling | doaj.art-35c4d86736d24ef996b3e2e1913dd3962023-06-08T15:05:50ZengAOSISContree0379-98672017-12-0179010.4102/nc.v79i0.9090Segregated schools of thought: The Bantu Education Act (1953) revisitedNadine Moore0University of PretoriaVarious political parties, civil rights groups and columnists support the view that one of South Africa’s foremost socio-economic challenges is overcoming the scarring legacy which the Bantu Education Act of 1953 left on the face of the country. In light of this challenge, a need arose to revisit the position and place of Bantu Education historiography in the current contested interpretation of its legacy. It is apparent from the plethora of literature available on this topic that academics are not in agreement about whether or not the passing of the 1953 Act was a watershed moment in marginalising education for black pupils. On the one hand, it would seem that the general consensus is that the 1953 Act was indeed a turning point in the formalisation of education reserved for pupils of colour – thus a largely “traditional” view. On the other hand, the Marxist school, as coined by P Christie and C Collins, argues that securing a cheap, unskilled labour force was already on the agenda of the white electorate preceding the formalisation of the Act. The aim of this article is two-fold. Firstly, to contextualise these two stances historically; and secondly and more chiefly, to examine the varying approaches regarding the rationalisation behind Bantu Education by testing these approaches against the rationale apparent in primary sources in the form of parliamentary debates and contemporary newspaper articles.https://newcontree.org.za/index.php/nc/article/view/90apartheidbantu educationeducationhistorymarxismhistoriography |
| spellingShingle | Nadine Moore Segregated schools of thought: The Bantu Education Act (1953) revisited Contree apartheid bantu education education history marxism historiography |
| title | Segregated schools of thought: The Bantu Education Act (1953) revisited |
| title_full | Segregated schools of thought: The Bantu Education Act (1953) revisited |
| title_fullStr | Segregated schools of thought: The Bantu Education Act (1953) revisited |
| title_full_unstemmed | Segregated schools of thought: The Bantu Education Act (1953) revisited |
| title_short | Segregated schools of thought: The Bantu Education Act (1953) revisited |
| title_sort | segregated schools of thought the bantu education act 1953 revisited |
| topic | apartheid bantu education education history marxism historiography |
| url | https://newcontree.org.za/index.php/nc/article/view/90 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nadinemoore segregatedschoolsofthoughtthebantueducationact1953revisited |