Children Consider Procedures, Outcomes, and Emotions When Judging the Fairness of Inequality

Children tend to view equal resource distributions as more fair than unequal ones, but will sometimes view even unequal distributions as fair. However, less is known about how children form judgments about inequality when different procedures are used. In the present study, we investigated children’...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucy M. Stowe, Rebecca Peretz-Lange, Peter R. Blake
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815901/full
_version_ 1818906977168785408
author Lucy M. Stowe
Rebecca Peretz-Lange
Peter R. Blake
author_facet Lucy M. Stowe
Rebecca Peretz-Lange
Peter R. Blake
author_sort Lucy M. Stowe
collection DOAJ
description Children tend to view equal resource distributions as more fair than unequal ones, but will sometimes view even unequal distributions as fair. However, less is known about how children form judgments about inequality when different procedures are used. In the present study, we investigated children’s consideration of procedures (i.e., resource-distributing processes), outcomes (i.e., the distributions themselves), and emotions (i.e., the emotional reactions of those receiving the resources) when judging the fairness of unequal resource distributions. Participants (N = 130, 3- to 8-year-olds) were introduced to a Fair Coin (different color on each side) and an Unfair Coin (same color on both sides). In two between-subjects conditions, they watched a researcher flip either the Fair or Unfair Coin in order to distribute resources unequally between two child recipients. Participants then rated the fairness of this event, provided verbal justifications for their ratings (coded for references to procedures and/or outcomes), and rated the emotional state of each recipient (from which an Emotion Difference Score was computed). Results revealed that participants rated the event as more fair in the Fair Coin than the Unfair Coin condition. References to the outcome in children’s justifications predicted lower fairness ratings, while references to the procedure only predicted lower ratings in the Unfair Coin condition. Greater Emotion Difference Scores predicted lower fairness ratings, and this effect increased with age. Together, these results show that children consider procedures, outcomes, and emotions when judging the fairness of inequality. Moreover, results suggest age-related increases in consideration of recipients’ emotions makes inequality seem less fair, even when fair procedures are used. Implications for the development of fairness are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T21:47:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-36017b6df98c46148a4e3fad82bdb3f6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T21:47:48Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-36017b6df98c46148a4e3fad82bdb3f62022-12-21T20:04:29ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782022-03-011310.3389/fpsyg.2022.815901815901Children Consider Procedures, Outcomes, and Emotions When Judging the Fairness of InequalityLucy M. Stowe0Rebecca Peretz-Lange1Peter R. Blake2Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, State University of New York, Purchase, NY, United StatesDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, United StatesChildren tend to view equal resource distributions as more fair than unequal ones, but will sometimes view even unequal distributions as fair. However, less is known about how children form judgments about inequality when different procedures are used. In the present study, we investigated children’s consideration of procedures (i.e., resource-distributing processes), outcomes (i.e., the distributions themselves), and emotions (i.e., the emotional reactions of those receiving the resources) when judging the fairness of unequal resource distributions. Participants (N = 130, 3- to 8-year-olds) were introduced to a Fair Coin (different color on each side) and an Unfair Coin (same color on both sides). In two between-subjects conditions, they watched a researcher flip either the Fair or Unfair Coin in order to distribute resources unequally between two child recipients. Participants then rated the fairness of this event, provided verbal justifications for their ratings (coded for references to procedures and/or outcomes), and rated the emotional state of each recipient (from which an Emotion Difference Score was computed). Results revealed that participants rated the event as more fair in the Fair Coin than the Unfair Coin condition. References to the outcome in children’s justifications predicted lower fairness ratings, while references to the procedure only predicted lower ratings in the Unfair Coin condition. Greater Emotion Difference Scores predicted lower fairness ratings, and this effect increased with age. Together, these results show that children consider procedures, outcomes, and emotions when judging the fairness of inequality. Moreover, results suggest age-related increases in consideration of recipients’ emotions makes inequality seem less fair, even when fair procedures are used. Implications for the development of fairness are discussed.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815901/fullfairness judgmentsproceduresdistributive justiceemotionsdevelopment
spellingShingle Lucy M. Stowe
Rebecca Peretz-Lange
Peter R. Blake
Children Consider Procedures, Outcomes, and Emotions When Judging the Fairness of Inequality
Frontiers in Psychology
fairness judgments
procedures
distributive justice
emotions
development
title Children Consider Procedures, Outcomes, and Emotions When Judging the Fairness of Inequality
title_full Children Consider Procedures, Outcomes, and Emotions When Judging the Fairness of Inequality
title_fullStr Children Consider Procedures, Outcomes, and Emotions When Judging the Fairness of Inequality
title_full_unstemmed Children Consider Procedures, Outcomes, and Emotions When Judging the Fairness of Inequality
title_short Children Consider Procedures, Outcomes, and Emotions When Judging the Fairness of Inequality
title_sort children consider procedures outcomes and emotions when judging the fairness of inequality
topic fairness judgments
procedures
distributive justice
emotions
development
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815901/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lucymstowe childrenconsiderproceduresoutcomesandemotionswhenjudgingthefairnessofinequality
AT rebeccaperetzlange childrenconsiderproceduresoutcomesandemotionswhenjudgingthefairnessofinequality
AT peterrblake childrenconsiderproceduresoutcomesandemotionswhenjudgingthefairnessofinequality