The solution surface of the Li-Stephens haplotype copying model

Abstract The Li-Stephens (LS) haplotype copying model forms the basis of a number of important statistical inference procedures in genetics. LS is a probabilistic generative model which supposes that a sampled chromosome is an imperfect mosaic of other chromosomes found in a population. In the frequ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yifan Jin, Jonathan Terhorst
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-08-01
Series:Algorithms for Molecular Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13015-023-00237-z
_version_ 1797453865348497408
author Yifan Jin
Jonathan Terhorst
author_facet Yifan Jin
Jonathan Terhorst
author_sort Yifan Jin
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The Li-Stephens (LS) haplotype copying model forms the basis of a number of important statistical inference procedures in genetics. LS is a probabilistic generative model which supposes that a sampled chromosome is an imperfect mosaic of other chromosomes found in a population. In the frequentist setting which is the focus of this paper, the output of LS is a “copying path” through chromosome space. The behavior of LS depends crucially on two user-specified parameters, $$\theta $$ θ and $$\rho $$ ρ , which are respectively interpreted as the rates of mutation and recombination. However, because LS is not based on a realistic model of ancestry, the precise connection between these parameters and the biological phenomena they represent is unclear. Here, we offer an alternative perspective, which considers $$\theta $$ θ and $$\rho $$ ρ as tuning parameters, and seeks to understand their impact on the LS output. We derive an algorithm which, for a given dataset, efficiently partitions the $$(\theta ,\rho )$$ ( θ , ρ ) plane into regions where the output of the algorithm is constant, thereby enumerating all possible solutions to the LS model in one go. We extend this approach to the “diploid LS” model commonly used for phasing. We demonstrate the usefulness of our method by studying the effects of changing $$\theta $$ θ and $$\rho $$ ρ when using LS for common bioinformatic tasks. Our findings indicate that using the conventional (i.e., population-scaled) values for $$\theta $$ θ and $$\rho $$ ρ produces near optimal results for imputation, but may systematically inflate switch error in the case of phasing diploid genotypes.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:29:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3a03fcd2395c42208a1ef5d54bd96b1e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-7188
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:29:03Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Algorithms for Molecular Biology
spelling doaj.art-3a03fcd2395c42208a1ef5d54bd96b1e2023-11-26T12:20:58ZengBMCAlgorithms for Molecular Biology1748-71882023-08-0118111510.1186/s13015-023-00237-zThe solution surface of the Li-Stephens haplotype copying modelYifan Jin0Jonathan Terhorst1Department of Statistics, University of MichiganDepartment of Statistics, University of MichiganAbstract The Li-Stephens (LS) haplotype copying model forms the basis of a number of important statistical inference procedures in genetics. LS is a probabilistic generative model which supposes that a sampled chromosome is an imperfect mosaic of other chromosomes found in a population. In the frequentist setting which is the focus of this paper, the output of LS is a “copying path” through chromosome space. The behavior of LS depends crucially on two user-specified parameters, $$\theta $$ θ and $$\rho $$ ρ , which are respectively interpreted as the rates of mutation and recombination. However, because LS is not based on a realistic model of ancestry, the precise connection between these parameters and the biological phenomena they represent is unclear. Here, we offer an alternative perspective, which considers $$\theta $$ θ and $$\rho $$ ρ as tuning parameters, and seeks to understand their impact on the LS output. We derive an algorithm which, for a given dataset, efficiently partitions the $$(\theta ,\rho )$$ ( θ , ρ ) plane into regions where the output of the algorithm is constant, thereby enumerating all possible solutions to the LS model in one go. We extend this approach to the “diploid LS” model commonly used for phasing. We demonstrate the usefulness of our method by studying the effects of changing $$\theta $$ θ and $$\rho $$ ρ when using LS for common bioinformatic tasks. Our findings indicate that using the conventional (i.e., population-scaled) values for $$\theta $$ θ and $$\rho $$ ρ produces near optimal results for imputation, but may systematically inflate switch error in the case of phasing diploid genotypes.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13015-023-00237-zLi-Stephens modelHaplotype copying modelSolution path
spellingShingle Yifan Jin
Jonathan Terhorst
The solution surface of the Li-Stephens haplotype copying model
Algorithms for Molecular Biology
Li-Stephens model
Haplotype copying model
Solution path
title The solution surface of the Li-Stephens haplotype copying model
title_full The solution surface of the Li-Stephens haplotype copying model
title_fullStr The solution surface of the Li-Stephens haplotype copying model
title_full_unstemmed The solution surface of the Li-Stephens haplotype copying model
title_short The solution surface of the Li-Stephens haplotype copying model
title_sort solution surface of the li stephens haplotype copying model
topic Li-Stephens model
Haplotype copying model
Solution path
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13015-023-00237-z
work_keys_str_mv AT yifanjin thesolutionsurfaceofthelistephenshaplotypecopyingmodel
AT jonathanterhorst thesolutionsurfaceofthelistephenshaplotypecopyingmodel
AT yifanjin solutionsurfaceofthelistephenshaplotypecopyingmodel
AT jonathanterhorst solutionsurfaceofthelistephenshaplotypecopyingmodel