The Indirect Antiglobulin (Coombs’) Test Is Specific but Less Sensitive Than the Direct Antiglobulin Test for Detecting Anti-Erythrocytic Autoantibodies and Thereby Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia in Dogs
The immunodiagnostic assessment of dogs suspected of having immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) is based on persistent autoagglutination of erythrocytes (after three saline washes), marked spherocytosis, and a positive direct antiglobulin (Coombs’) test (DAT). However, the value of using the ind...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-06-01
|
Series: | Veterinary Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/10/7/415 |
_version_ | 1797587288220237824 |
---|---|
author | Nadine Idalan Elisabeth Müller Urs Giger |
author_facet | Nadine Idalan Elisabeth Müller Urs Giger |
author_sort | Nadine Idalan |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The immunodiagnostic assessment of dogs suspected of having immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) is based on persistent autoagglutination of erythrocytes (after three saline washes), marked spherocytosis, and a positive direct antiglobulin (Coombs’) test (DAT). However, the value of using the indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) for the detection of anti-erythrocytic autoantibodies in serum from dogs suspected of having IMHA is unclear. To evaluate the IAT, leftover serum samples from a large cohort of 94 dogs suspected of having IMHA and for which DAT results were known were incubated with DAT− erythrocytes, and five IAT techniques were performed (in part with different reagents and temperatures): microtiter plate (MICRO), microcapillary, laboratory gel column, gel minitube kit (GEL KIT), and immunochromatographic strip kit. Two IAT techniques (MICRO at 37 °C and GEL KIT with rabbit anti-dog polyvalent reagent) detected autoantibodies against erythrocytes in serum from 53% and 57% of DAT+ dogs, respectively, while other IATs performed less well. Moreover, while the analytic specificity of the IAT methods compared to the DAT ranged from 96–100%, the sensitivity range was only 9–57%. Thus, we still recommend DAT for diagnosis and monitoring of IMHA in dogs but conclude that a positive IAT result may aid diagnostically when serum is available, but fresh red blood cells are not. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T00:34:02Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-3a12b31921e94ecfa808edab8df59e13 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2306-7381 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T00:34:02Z |
publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Veterinary Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-3a12b31921e94ecfa808edab8df59e132023-11-18T21:42:15ZengMDPI AGVeterinary Sciences2306-73812023-06-0110741510.3390/vetsci10070415The Indirect Antiglobulin (Coombs’) Test Is Specific but Less Sensitive Than the Direct Antiglobulin Test for Detecting Anti-Erythrocytic Autoantibodies and Thereby Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia in DogsNadine Idalan0Elisabeth Müller1Urs Giger2Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, SwitzerlandLaboklin GmbH & Co KG, 97688 Bad Kissingen, GermanyClinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, SwitzerlandThe immunodiagnostic assessment of dogs suspected of having immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) is based on persistent autoagglutination of erythrocytes (after three saline washes), marked spherocytosis, and a positive direct antiglobulin (Coombs’) test (DAT). However, the value of using the indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) for the detection of anti-erythrocytic autoantibodies in serum from dogs suspected of having IMHA is unclear. To evaluate the IAT, leftover serum samples from a large cohort of 94 dogs suspected of having IMHA and for which DAT results were known were incubated with DAT− erythrocytes, and five IAT techniques were performed (in part with different reagents and temperatures): microtiter plate (MICRO), microcapillary, laboratory gel column, gel minitube kit (GEL KIT), and immunochromatographic strip kit. Two IAT techniques (MICRO at 37 °C and GEL KIT with rabbit anti-dog polyvalent reagent) detected autoantibodies against erythrocytes in serum from 53% and 57% of DAT+ dogs, respectively, while other IATs performed less well. Moreover, while the analytic specificity of the IAT methods compared to the DAT ranged from 96–100%, the sensitivity range was only 9–57%. Thus, we still recommend DAT for diagnosis and monitoring of IMHA in dogs but conclude that a positive IAT result may aid diagnostically when serum is available, but fresh red blood cells are not.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/10/7/415autoagglutinationimmunodiagnosticscaninehematologyred blood cells |
spellingShingle | Nadine Idalan Elisabeth Müller Urs Giger The Indirect Antiglobulin (Coombs’) Test Is Specific but Less Sensitive Than the Direct Antiglobulin Test for Detecting Anti-Erythrocytic Autoantibodies and Thereby Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia in Dogs Veterinary Sciences autoagglutination immunodiagnostics canine hematology red blood cells |
title | The Indirect Antiglobulin (Coombs’) Test Is Specific but Less Sensitive Than the Direct Antiglobulin Test for Detecting Anti-Erythrocytic Autoantibodies and Thereby Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia in Dogs |
title_full | The Indirect Antiglobulin (Coombs’) Test Is Specific but Less Sensitive Than the Direct Antiglobulin Test for Detecting Anti-Erythrocytic Autoantibodies and Thereby Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia in Dogs |
title_fullStr | The Indirect Antiglobulin (Coombs’) Test Is Specific but Less Sensitive Than the Direct Antiglobulin Test for Detecting Anti-Erythrocytic Autoantibodies and Thereby Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia in Dogs |
title_full_unstemmed | The Indirect Antiglobulin (Coombs’) Test Is Specific but Less Sensitive Than the Direct Antiglobulin Test for Detecting Anti-Erythrocytic Autoantibodies and Thereby Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia in Dogs |
title_short | The Indirect Antiglobulin (Coombs’) Test Is Specific but Less Sensitive Than the Direct Antiglobulin Test for Detecting Anti-Erythrocytic Autoantibodies and Thereby Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia in Dogs |
title_sort | indirect antiglobulin coombs test is specific but less sensitive than the direct antiglobulin test for detecting anti erythrocytic autoantibodies and thereby immune mediated hemolytic anemia in dogs |
topic | autoagglutination immunodiagnostics canine hematology red blood cells |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/10/7/415 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nadineidalan theindirectantiglobulincoombstestisspecificbutlesssensitivethanthedirectantiglobulintestfordetectingantierythrocyticautoantibodiesandtherebyimmunemediatedhemolyticanemiaindogs AT elisabethmuller theindirectantiglobulincoombstestisspecificbutlesssensitivethanthedirectantiglobulintestfordetectingantierythrocyticautoantibodiesandtherebyimmunemediatedhemolyticanemiaindogs AT ursgiger theindirectantiglobulincoombstestisspecificbutlesssensitivethanthedirectantiglobulintestfordetectingantierythrocyticautoantibodiesandtherebyimmunemediatedhemolyticanemiaindogs AT nadineidalan indirectantiglobulincoombstestisspecificbutlesssensitivethanthedirectantiglobulintestfordetectingantierythrocyticautoantibodiesandtherebyimmunemediatedhemolyticanemiaindogs AT elisabethmuller indirectantiglobulincoombstestisspecificbutlesssensitivethanthedirectantiglobulintestfordetectingantierythrocyticautoantibodiesandtherebyimmunemediatedhemolyticanemiaindogs AT ursgiger indirectantiglobulincoombstestisspecificbutlesssensitivethanthedirectantiglobulintestfordetectingantierythrocyticautoantibodiesandtherebyimmunemediatedhemolyticanemiaindogs |