The Indirect Antiglobulin (Coombs’) Test Is Specific but Less Sensitive Than the Direct Antiglobulin Test for Detecting Anti-Erythrocytic Autoantibodies and Thereby Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia in Dogs

The immunodiagnostic assessment of dogs suspected of having immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) is based on persistent autoagglutination of erythrocytes (after three saline washes), marked spherocytosis, and a positive direct antiglobulin (Coombs’) test (DAT). However, the value of using the ind...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nadine Idalan, Elisabeth Müller, Urs Giger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-06-01
Series:Veterinary Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/10/7/415
_version_ 1797587288220237824
author Nadine Idalan
Elisabeth Müller
Urs Giger
author_facet Nadine Idalan
Elisabeth Müller
Urs Giger
author_sort Nadine Idalan
collection DOAJ
description The immunodiagnostic assessment of dogs suspected of having immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) is based on persistent autoagglutination of erythrocytes (after three saline washes), marked spherocytosis, and a positive direct antiglobulin (Coombs’) test (DAT). However, the value of using the indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) for the detection of anti-erythrocytic autoantibodies in serum from dogs suspected of having IMHA is unclear. To evaluate the IAT, leftover serum samples from a large cohort of 94 dogs suspected of having IMHA and for which DAT results were known were incubated with DAT− erythrocytes, and five IAT techniques were performed (in part with different reagents and temperatures): microtiter plate (MICRO), microcapillary, laboratory gel column, gel minitube kit (GEL KIT), and immunochromatographic strip kit. Two IAT techniques (MICRO at 37 °C and GEL KIT with rabbit anti-dog polyvalent reagent) detected autoantibodies against erythrocytes in serum from 53% and 57% of DAT+ dogs, respectively, while other IATs performed less well. Moreover, while the analytic specificity of the IAT methods compared to the DAT ranged from 96–100%, the sensitivity range was only 9–57%. Thus, we still recommend DAT for diagnosis and monitoring of IMHA in dogs but conclude that a positive IAT result may aid diagnostically when serum is available, but fresh red blood cells are not.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T00:34:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3a12b31921e94ecfa808edab8df59e13
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2306-7381
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T00:34:02Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Veterinary Sciences
spelling doaj.art-3a12b31921e94ecfa808edab8df59e132023-11-18T21:42:15ZengMDPI AGVeterinary Sciences2306-73812023-06-0110741510.3390/vetsci10070415The Indirect Antiglobulin (Coombs’) Test Is Specific but Less Sensitive Than the Direct Antiglobulin Test for Detecting Anti-Erythrocytic Autoantibodies and Thereby Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia in DogsNadine Idalan0Elisabeth Müller1Urs Giger2Clinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, SwitzerlandLaboklin GmbH & Co KG, 97688 Bad Kissingen, GermanyClinic for Small Animal Internal Medicine, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, SwitzerlandThe immunodiagnostic assessment of dogs suspected of having immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) is based on persistent autoagglutination of erythrocytes (after three saline washes), marked spherocytosis, and a positive direct antiglobulin (Coombs’) test (DAT). However, the value of using the indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) for the detection of anti-erythrocytic autoantibodies in serum from dogs suspected of having IMHA is unclear. To evaluate the IAT, leftover serum samples from a large cohort of 94 dogs suspected of having IMHA and for which DAT results were known were incubated with DAT− erythrocytes, and five IAT techniques were performed (in part with different reagents and temperatures): microtiter plate (MICRO), microcapillary, laboratory gel column, gel minitube kit (GEL KIT), and immunochromatographic strip kit. Two IAT techniques (MICRO at 37 °C and GEL KIT with rabbit anti-dog polyvalent reagent) detected autoantibodies against erythrocytes in serum from 53% and 57% of DAT+ dogs, respectively, while other IATs performed less well. Moreover, while the analytic specificity of the IAT methods compared to the DAT ranged from 96–100%, the sensitivity range was only 9–57%. Thus, we still recommend DAT for diagnosis and monitoring of IMHA in dogs but conclude that a positive IAT result may aid diagnostically when serum is available, but fresh red blood cells are not.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/10/7/415autoagglutinationimmunodiagnosticscaninehematologyred blood cells
spellingShingle Nadine Idalan
Elisabeth Müller
Urs Giger
The Indirect Antiglobulin (Coombs’) Test Is Specific but Less Sensitive Than the Direct Antiglobulin Test for Detecting Anti-Erythrocytic Autoantibodies and Thereby Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia in Dogs
Veterinary Sciences
autoagglutination
immunodiagnostics
canine
hematology
red blood cells
title The Indirect Antiglobulin (Coombs’) Test Is Specific but Less Sensitive Than the Direct Antiglobulin Test for Detecting Anti-Erythrocytic Autoantibodies and Thereby Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia in Dogs
title_full The Indirect Antiglobulin (Coombs’) Test Is Specific but Less Sensitive Than the Direct Antiglobulin Test for Detecting Anti-Erythrocytic Autoantibodies and Thereby Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia in Dogs
title_fullStr The Indirect Antiglobulin (Coombs’) Test Is Specific but Less Sensitive Than the Direct Antiglobulin Test for Detecting Anti-Erythrocytic Autoantibodies and Thereby Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia in Dogs
title_full_unstemmed The Indirect Antiglobulin (Coombs’) Test Is Specific but Less Sensitive Than the Direct Antiglobulin Test for Detecting Anti-Erythrocytic Autoantibodies and Thereby Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia in Dogs
title_short The Indirect Antiglobulin (Coombs’) Test Is Specific but Less Sensitive Than the Direct Antiglobulin Test for Detecting Anti-Erythrocytic Autoantibodies and Thereby Immune-Mediated Hemolytic Anemia in Dogs
title_sort indirect antiglobulin coombs test is specific but less sensitive than the direct antiglobulin test for detecting anti erythrocytic autoantibodies and thereby immune mediated hemolytic anemia in dogs
topic autoagglutination
immunodiagnostics
canine
hematology
red blood cells
url https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/10/7/415
work_keys_str_mv AT nadineidalan theindirectantiglobulincoombstestisspecificbutlesssensitivethanthedirectantiglobulintestfordetectingantierythrocyticautoantibodiesandtherebyimmunemediatedhemolyticanemiaindogs
AT elisabethmuller theindirectantiglobulincoombstestisspecificbutlesssensitivethanthedirectantiglobulintestfordetectingantierythrocyticautoantibodiesandtherebyimmunemediatedhemolyticanemiaindogs
AT ursgiger theindirectantiglobulincoombstestisspecificbutlesssensitivethanthedirectantiglobulintestfordetectingantierythrocyticautoantibodiesandtherebyimmunemediatedhemolyticanemiaindogs
AT nadineidalan indirectantiglobulincoombstestisspecificbutlesssensitivethanthedirectantiglobulintestfordetectingantierythrocyticautoantibodiesandtherebyimmunemediatedhemolyticanemiaindogs
AT elisabethmuller indirectantiglobulincoombstestisspecificbutlesssensitivethanthedirectantiglobulintestfordetectingantierythrocyticautoantibodiesandtherebyimmunemediatedhemolyticanemiaindogs
AT ursgiger indirectantiglobulincoombstestisspecificbutlesssensitivethanthedirectantiglobulintestfordetectingantierythrocyticautoantibodiesandtherebyimmunemediatedhemolyticanemiaindogs