Identifying Key Somatic Copy Number Alterations Driving Dysregulation of Cancer Hallmarks in Lower-Grade Glioma

Somatic copy-number alterations (SCNAs) are major contributors to cancer development that are pervasive and highly heterogeneous in human cancers. However, the driver roles of SCNAs in cancer are insufficiently characterized. We combined network propagation and linear regression models to design an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yao Zhou, Shuai Wang, Haoteng Yan, Bo Pang, Xinxin Zhang, Lin Pang, Yihan Wang, Jinyuan Xu, Jing Hu, Yujia Lan, Yanyan Ping
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Genetics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.654736/full
_version_ 1819103152158277632
author Yao Zhou
Shuai Wang
Haoteng Yan
Bo Pang
Xinxin Zhang
Lin Pang
Yihan Wang
Jinyuan Xu
Jing Hu
Yujia Lan
Yanyan Ping
author_facet Yao Zhou
Shuai Wang
Haoteng Yan
Bo Pang
Xinxin Zhang
Lin Pang
Yihan Wang
Jinyuan Xu
Jing Hu
Yujia Lan
Yanyan Ping
author_sort Yao Zhou
collection DOAJ
description Somatic copy-number alterations (SCNAs) are major contributors to cancer development that are pervasive and highly heterogeneous in human cancers. However, the driver roles of SCNAs in cancer are insufficiently characterized. We combined network propagation and linear regression models to design an integrative strategy to identify driver SCNAs and dissect the functional roles of SCNAs by integrating profiles of copy number and gene expression in lower-grade glioma (LGG). We applied our strategy to 511 LGG patients and identified 98 driver genes that dysregulated 29 cancer hallmark signatures, forming 143 active gene-hallmark pairs. We found that these active gene-hallmark pairs could stratify LGG patients into four subtypes with significantly different survival times. The two new subtypes with similar poorest prognoses were driven by two different gene sets (one including EGFR, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, INFA8, and INFA5, and the other including CDK4, AVIL, and DTX3), respectively. The SCNAs of the two gene sets could disorder the same cancer hallmark signature in a mutually exclusive manner (including E2F_TARGETS and G2M_CHECKPOINT). Compared with previous methods, our strategy could not only capture the known cancer genes and directly dissect the functional roles of their SCNAs in LGG, but also discover the functions of new driver genes in LGG, such as IFNA5, IFNA8, and DTX3. Additionally, our method can be applied to a variety of cancer types to explore the pathogenesis of driver SCNAs and improve the treatment and diagnosis of cancer.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T01:45:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3b3b9c251b174221baa8239c0a9fc53a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-8021
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T01:45:55Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Genetics
spelling doaj.art-3b3b9c251b174221baa8239c0a9fc53a2022-12-21T18:43:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212021-06-011210.3389/fgene.2021.654736654736Identifying Key Somatic Copy Number Alterations Driving Dysregulation of Cancer Hallmarks in Lower-Grade GliomaYao ZhouShuai WangHaoteng YanBo PangXinxin ZhangLin PangYihan WangJinyuan XuJing HuYujia LanYanyan PingSomatic copy-number alterations (SCNAs) are major contributors to cancer development that are pervasive and highly heterogeneous in human cancers. However, the driver roles of SCNAs in cancer are insufficiently characterized. We combined network propagation and linear regression models to design an integrative strategy to identify driver SCNAs and dissect the functional roles of SCNAs by integrating profiles of copy number and gene expression in lower-grade glioma (LGG). We applied our strategy to 511 LGG patients and identified 98 driver genes that dysregulated 29 cancer hallmark signatures, forming 143 active gene-hallmark pairs. We found that these active gene-hallmark pairs could stratify LGG patients into four subtypes with significantly different survival times. The two new subtypes with similar poorest prognoses were driven by two different gene sets (one including EGFR, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, INFA8, and INFA5, and the other including CDK4, AVIL, and DTX3), respectively. The SCNAs of the two gene sets could disorder the same cancer hallmark signature in a mutually exclusive manner (including E2F_TARGETS and G2M_CHECKPOINT). Compared with previous methods, our strategy could not only capture the known cancer genes and directly dissect the functional roles of their SCNAs in LGG, but also discover the functions of new driver genes in LGG, such as IFNA5, IFNA8, and DTX3. Additionally, our method can be applied to a variety of cancer types to explore the pathogenesis of driver SCNAs and improve the treatment and diagnosis of cancer.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.654736/fullsomatic copy number alterationdriver genesrandom walk with restartcancer hallmarkLGGregression analysis
spellingShingle Yao Zhou
Shuai Wang
Haoteng Yan
Bo Pang
Xinxin Zhang
Lin Pang
Yihan Wang
Jinyuan Xu
Jing Hu
Yujia Lan
Yanyan Ping
Identifying Key Somatic Copy Number Alterations Driving Dysregulation of Cancer Hallmarks in Lower-Grade Glioma
Frontiers in Genetics
somatic copy number alteration
driver genes
random walk with restart
cancer hallmark
LGG
regression analysis
title Identifying Key Somatic Copy Number Alterations Driving Dysregulation of Cancer Hallmarks in Lower-Grade Glioma
title_full Identifying Key Somatic Copy Number Alterations Driving Dysregulation of Cancer Hallmarks in Lower-Grade Glioma
title_fullStr Identifying Key Somatic Copy Number Alterations Driving Dysregulation of Cancer Hallmarks in Lower-Grade Glioma
title_full_unstemmed Identifying Key Somatic Copy Number Alterations Driving Dysregulation of Cancer Hallmarks in Lower-Grade Glioma
title_short Identifying Key Somatic Copy Number Alterations Driving Dysregulation of Cancer Hallmarks in Lower-Grade Glioma
title_sort identifying key somatic copy number alterations driving dysregulation of cancer hallmarks in lower grade glioma
topic somatic copy number alteration
driver genes
random walk with restart
cancer hallmark
LGG
regression analysis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.654736/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yaozhou identifyingkeysomaticcopynumberalterationsdrivingdysregulationofcancerhallmarksinlowergradeglioma
AT shuaiwang identifyingkeysomaticcopynumberalterationsdrivingdysregulationofcancerhallmarksinlowergradeglioma
AT haotengyan identifyingkeysomaticcopynumberalterationsdrivingdysregulationofcancerhallmarksinlowergradeglioma
AT bopang identifyingkeysomaticcopynumberalterationsdrivingdysregulationofcancerhallmarksinlowergradeglioma
AT xinxinzhang identifyingkeysomaticcopynumberalterationsdrivingdysregulationofcancerhallmarksinlowergradeglioma
AT linpang identifyingkeysomaticcopynumberalterationsdrivingdysregulationofcancerhallmarksinlowergradeglioma
AT yihanwang identifyingkeysomaticcopynumberalterationsdrivingdysregulationofcancerhallmarksinlowergradeglioma
AT jinyuanxu identifyingkeysomaticcopynumberalterationsdrivingdysregulationofcancerhallmarksinlowergradeglioma
AT jinghu identifyingkeysomaticcopynumberalterationsdrivingdysregulationofcancerhallmarksinlowergradeglioma
AT yujialan identifyingkeysomaticcopynumberalterationsdrivingdysregulationofcancerhallmarksinlowergradeglioma
AT yanyanping identifyingkeysomaticcopynumberalterationsdrivingdysregulationofcancerhallmarksinlowergradeglioma