‘Good question’: Exploring the experiences of generating questions in coaching

This research uses heuristic inquiry to provide insight into experiences of generating questions in coaching. Eight experienced coaches, recruited as co-researchers, shared their experiences of generating coaching questions via post-coaching reflections and conversational interviews. Thematic analys...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Glenn Wallis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Brookes University 2010-06-01
Series:International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring
Subjects:
Online Access:https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/file/ebf84139-6c10-48aa-9476-f521158f2b7e/1/special10-paper-02.pdf
_version_ 1827391354237353984
author Glenn Wallis
author_facet Glenn Wallis
author_sort Glenn Wallis
collection DOAJ
description This research uses heuristic inquiry to provide insight into experiences of generating questions in coaching. Eight experienced coaches, recruited as co-researchers, shared their experiences of generating coaching questions via post-coaching reflections and conversational interviews. Thematic analysis of the data identified that coaches noticed a wide range of elements when forming questions. Questions frequently ‘pop’ into the heads of coaches, accompanied by somatic sensations. When asking questions, coaches used prefacing statements for their own or their client’s benefit. Inner dialogue was experienced, often in the form of meta-questioning. This research highlighted three paradoxes that coaches tried to balance while enquiring of their clients. Suggestions for future research are also proposed.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T17:09:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3bf907dac0c8445c9fd6a1157e7cd9a4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn XXXX-XXXX
1741-8305
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T17:09:38Z
publishDate 2010-06-01
publisher Oxford Brookes University
record_format Article
series International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring
spelling doaj.art-3bf907dac0c8445c9fd6a1157e7cd9a42024-01-03T22:11:21ZengOxford Brookes UniversityInternational Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and MentoringXXXX-XXXX1741-83052010-06-01S101628‘Good question’: Exploring the experiences of generating questions in coachingGlenn Wallis0Performance Edge Partners Ltd.This research uses heuristic inquiry to provide insight into experiences of generating questions in coaching. Eight experienced coaches, recruited as co-researchers, shared their experiences of generating coaching questions via post-coaching reflections and conversational interviews. Thematic analysis of the data identified that coaches noticed a wide range of elements when forming questions. Questions frequently ‘pop’ into the heads of coaches, accompanied by somatic sensations. When asking questions, coaches used prefacing statements for their own or their client’s benefit. Inner dialogue was experienced, often in the form of meta-questioning. This research highlighted three paradoxes that coaches tried to balance while enquiring of their clients. Suggestions for future research are also proposed.https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/file/ebf84139-6c10-48aa-9476-f521158f2b7e/1/special10-paper-02.pdfcoachingquestionsheuristic inquiryparadoxexperiencedyad
spellingShingle Glenn Wallis
‘Good question’: Exploring the experiences of generating questions in coaching
International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring
coaching
questions
heuristic inquiry
paradox
experience
dyad
title ‘Good question’: Exploring the experiences of generating questions in coaching
title_full ‘Good question’: Exploring the experiences of generating questions in coaching
title_fullStr ‘Good question’: Exploring the experiences of generating questions in coaching
title_full_unstemmed ‘Good question’: Exploring the experiences of generating questions in coaching
title_short ‘Good question’: Exploring the experiences of generating questions in coaching
title_sort good question exploring the experiences of generating questions in coaching
topic coaching
questions
heuristic inquiry
paradox
experience
dyad
url https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/file/ebf84139-6c10-48aa-9476-f521158f2b7e/1/special10-paper-02.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT glennwallis goodquestionexploringtheexperiencesofgeneratingquestionsincoaching