Statistical regularities attract attention when task-relevant

Visual attention seems essential for learning the statistical regularities in our environment, a process known as statistical learning. However, how attention is allocated when exploring a novel visual scene whose statistical structure is unknown remains unclear. In order to address this question, w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea eAlamia, Alexandre eZénon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00042/full
_version_ 1818049328277618688
author Andrea eAlamia
Alexandre eZénon
author_facet Andrea eAlamia
Alexandre eZénon
author_sort Andrea eAlamia
collection DOAJ
description Visual attention seems essential for learning the statistical regularities in our environment, a process known as statistical learning. However, how attention is allocated when exploring a novel visual scene whose statistical structure is unknown remains unclear. In order to address this question, we investigated visual attention allocation during a task in which we manipulated the conditional probability of occurrence of colored stimuli, unbeknown to the subjects. Participants were instructed to detect a target colored dot among two dots moving along separate circular paths. We evaluated implicit statistical learning, i.e. the effect of color predictability on reaction times (RT), and recorded eye position concurrently. Attention allocation was indexed by comparing the Mahalanobis distance between the position, velocity and acceleration of the eyes and the 2 colored dots.We found that learning the conditional probabilities occurred very early during the course of the experiment as shown by the fact that, starting already from the first block, predictable stimuli were detected with shorter RT than unpredictable ones. In terms of attentional allocation, we found that the predictive stimulus attracted gaze only when it was informative about the occurrence of the target but not when it predicted the occurrence of a task-irrelevant stimulus. This suggests that attention allocation was influenced by regularities only when they were instrumental in performing the task. Moreover, we found that the attentional bias towards task-relevant predictive stimuli occurred at a very early stage of learning, concomitantly with the first effects of learning on RT.In conclusion, these results show that statistical regularities capture visual attention only after a few occurrences, provided these regularities are instrumental to perform the task.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T10:35:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3c73297b55eb4ab9a7a502753d9effe9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5161
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T10:35:50Z
publishDate 2016-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-3c73297b55eb4ab9a7a502753d9effe92022-12-22T01:52:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612016-02-011010.3389/fnhum.2016.00042164410Statistical regularities attract attention when task-relevantAndrea eAlamia0Alexandre eZénon1Université Catholique de LouvainUniversité Catholique de LouvainVisual attention seems essential for learning the statistical regularities in our environment, a process known as statistical learning. However, how attention is allocated when exploring a novel visual scene whose statistical structure is unknown remains unclear. In order to address this question, we investigated visual attention allocation during a task in which we manipulated the conditional probability of occurrence of colored stimuli, unbeknown to the subjects. Participants were instructed to detect a target colored dot among two dots moving along separate circular paths. We evaluated implicit statistical learning, i.e. the effect of color predictability on reaction times (RT), and recorded eye position concurrently. Attention allocation was indexed by comparing the Mahalanobis distance between the position, velocity and acceleration of the eyes and the 2 colored dots.We found that learning the conditional probabilities occurred very early during the course of the experiment as shown by the fact that, starting already from the first block, predictable stimuli were detected with shorter RT than unpredictable ones. In terms of attentional allocation, we found that the predictive stimulus attracted gaze only when it was informative about the occurrence of the target but not when it predicted the occurrence of a task-irrelevant stimulus. This suggests that attention allocation was influenced by regularities only when they were instrumental in performing the task. Moreover, we found that the attentional bias towards task-relevant predictive stimuli occurred at a very early stage of learning, concomitantly with the first effects of learning on RT.In conclusion, these results show that statistical regularities capture visual attention only after a few occurrences, provided these regularities are instrumental to perform the task.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00042/fullvisual attentionimplicit learningeye trackingstatistical learningselective attention
spellingShingle Andrea eAlamia
Alexandre eZénon
Statistical regularities attract attention when task-relevant
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
visual attention
implicit learning
eye tracking
statistical learning
selective attention
title Statistical regularities attract attention when task-relevant
title_full Statistical regularities attract attention when task-relevant
title_fullStr Statistical regularities attract attention when task-relevant
title_full_unstemmed Statistical regularities attract attention when task-relevant
title_short Statistical regularities attract attention when task-relevant
title_sort statistical regularities attract attention when task relevant
topic visual attention
implicit learning
eye tracking
statistical learning
selective attention
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00042/full
work_keys_str_mv AT andreaealamia statisticalregularitiesattractattentionwhentaskrelevant
AT alexandreezenon statisticalregularitiesattractattentionwhentaskrelevant