Pressure Adaptations in Deep-Sea <i>Moritella</i> Dihydrofolate Reductases: Compressibility versus Stability
Proteins from “pressure-loving” piezophiles appear to adapt by greater compressibility via larger total cavity volume. However, larger cavities in proteins have been associated with lower unfolding pressures. Here, dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) from a moderate piezophile <i>Moritella profunda...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-11-01
|
Series: | Biology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/10/11/1211 |
_version_ | 1797511128821006336 |
---|---|
author | Ryan W. Penhallurick Toshiko Ichiye |
author_facet | Ryan W. Penhallurick Toshiko Ichiye |
author_sort | Ryan W. Penhallurick |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Proteins from “pressure-loving” piezophiles appear to adapt by greater compressibility via larger total cavity volume. However, larger cavities in proteins have been associated with lower unfolding pressures. Here, dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) from a moderate piezophile <i>Moritella profunda</i> (Mp) isolated at ~2.9 km in depth and from a hyperpiezophile <i>Moritella yayanosii</i> (My) isolated at ~11 km in depth were compared using molecular dynamics simulations. Although previous simulations indicate that MpDHFR is more compressible than a mesophile DHFR, here the average properties and a quasiharmonic analysis indicate that MpDHFR and MyDHFR have similar compressibilities. A cavity analysis also indicates that the three unique mutations in MyDHFR are near cavities, although the cavities are generally similar in size in both. However, while a cleft overlaps an internal cavity, thus forming a pathway from the surface to the interior in MpDHFR, the unique residue Tyr103 found in MyDHFR forms a hydrogen bond with Leu78, and the sidechain separates the cleft from the cavity. Thus, while <i>Moritella</i> DHFR may generally be well suited to high-pressure environments because of their greater compressibility, adaptation for greater depths may be to prevent water entry into the interior cavities. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T05:41:04Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-3d535b27787c4d6f9c5a177425849307 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2079-7737 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T05:41:04Z |
publishDate | 2021-11-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Biology |
spelling | doaj.art-3d535b27787c4d6f9c5a1774258493072023-11-22T22:28:59ZengMDPI AGBiology2079-77372021-11-011011121110.3390/biology10111211Pressure Adaptations in Deep-Sea <i>Moritella</i> Dihydrofolate Reductases: Compressibility versus StabilityRyan W. Penhallurick0Toshiko Ichiye1Department of Chemistry, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USADepartment of Chemistry, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USAProteins from “pressure-loving” piezophiles appear to adapt by greater compressibility via larger total cavity volume. However, larger cavities in proteins have been associated with lower unfolding pressures. Here, dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) from a moderate piezophile <i>Moritella profunda</i> (Mp) isolated at ~2.9 km in depth and from a hyperpiezophile <i>Moritella yayanosii</i> (My) isolated at ~11 km in depth were compared using molecular dynamics simulations. Although previous simulations indicate that MpDHFR is more compressible than a mesophile DHFR, here the average properties and a quasiharmonic analysis indicate that MpDHFR and MyDHFR have similar compressibilities. A cavity analysis also indicates that the three unique mutations in MyDHFR are near cavities, although the cavities are generally similar in size in both. However, while a cleft overlaps an internal cavity, thus forming a pathway from the surface to the interior in MpDHFR, the unique residue Tyr103 found in MyDHFR forms a hydrogen bond with Leu78, and the sidechain separates the cleft from the cavity. Thus, while <i>Moritella</i> DHFR may generally be well suited to high-pressure environments because of their greater compressibility, adaptation for greater depths may be to prevent water entry into the interior cavities.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/10/11/1211deep-sea adaptationscompressibilitycavitiespressurepotential energy landscape |
spellingShingle | Ryan W. Penhallurick Toshiko Ichiye Pressure Adaptations in Deep-Sea <i>Moritella</i> Dihydrofolate Reductases: Compressibility versus Stability Biology deep-sea adaptations compressibility cavities pressure potential energy landscape |
title | Pressure Adaptations in Deep-Sea <i>Moritella</i> Dihydrofolate Reductases: Compressibility versus Stability |
title_full | Pressure Adaptations in Deep-Sea <i>Moritella</i> Dihydrofolate Reductases: Compressibility versus Stability |
title_fullStr | Pressure Adaptations in Deep-Sea <i>Moritella</i> Dihydrofolate Reductases: Compressibility versus Stability |
title_full_unstemmed | Pressure Adaptations in Deep-Sea <i>Moritella</i> Dihydrofolate Reductases: Compressibility versus Stability |
title_short | Pressure Adaptations in Deep-Sea <i>Moritella</i> Dihydrofolate Reductases: Compressibility versus Stability |
title_sort | pressure adaptations in deep sea i moritella i dihydrofolate reductases compressibility versus stability |
topic | deep-sea adaptations compressibility cavities pressure potential energy landscape |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/10/11/1211 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ryanwpenhallurick pressureadaptationsindeepseaimoritellaidihydrofolatereductasescompressibilityversusstability AT toshikoichiye pressureadaptationsindeepseaimoritellaidihydrofolatereductasescompressibilityversusstability |