Efficacy and safety of two incobotulinumtoxinA injection intervals in cervical dystonia patients with inadequate benefit from standard injection intervals of botulinum toxin: Phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study

IntroductionSome patients with cervical dystonia (CD) receiving long-term botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) therapy report early waning of treatment benefit before the typical 12-week reinjection interval. Methods: This phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study (CD Flex; NCT01486264) compared...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cynthia Comella, Robert A. Hauser, Stuart H. Isaacson, Daniel Truong, Odinachi Oguh, Jennifer Hui, Eric S. Molho, Matthew Brodsky, Erin Furr-Stimming, Georg Comes, Michael A. Hast, David Charles
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-01-01
Series:Clinical Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590112522000135
_version_ 1818204845411139584
author Cynthia Comella
Robert A. Hauser
Stuart H. Isaacson
Daniel Truong
Odinachi Oguh
Jennifer Hui
Eric S. Molho
Matthew Brodsky
Erin Furr-Stimming
Georg Comes
Michael A. Hast
David Charles
author_facet Cynthia Comella
Robert A. Hauser
Stuart H. Isaacson
Daniel Truong
Odinachi Oguh
Jennifer Hui
Eric S. Molho
Matthew Brodsky
Erin Furr-Stimming
Georg Comes
Michael A. Hast
David Charles
author_sort Cynthia Comella
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionSome patients with cervical dystonia (CD) receiving long-term botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) therapy report early waning of treatment benefit before the typical 12-week reinjection interval. Methods: This phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study (CD Flex; NCT01486264) compared 2 incobotulinumtoxinA injection schedules (Short Flex: 8 ± 2 weeks; Long Flex: 14 ± 2 weeks) in CD patients. Previous BoNT-responsive subjects who reported acceptable clinical benefit lasting < 10 weeks were recruited. Efficacy and safety were evaluated after 8 injection cycles. The primary endpoint was change in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale 4 weeks after the eighth injection. Secondary endpoints included TWSTRS total and subscale scores. Immunogenicity was assessed in a subset of patients. Results: Two hundred eighty-two CD patients were randomized and treated (Short Flex, N = 142; Long Flex, N = 140), and 207 completed the study. Significant improvements in TWSTRS severity from study baseline to 4 weeks after cycle 8 were observed in both the Short Flex (4.1 points; P < 0.0001) and Long Flex (2.4 points; P = 0.002) groups; Short Flex was noninferior to Long Flex (LS mean difference = 1.4 points; 95% CI = [−2.9, 0.1] < Δ = 2.0). Key secondary endpoints favored Short Flex intervals. Adverse events (AEs) were comparable between groups. There was no secondary loss of treatment effect. Conclusion: Injection cycles < 10 weeks for incobotulinumtoxinA are effective (and noninferior to longer intervals) for treating CD patients with early waning of clinical benefit. Shorter injection intervals did not increase AEs or lead to loss of treatment effect.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T03:47:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3fa867ffb3694c2dbb3fcc82e13d78bd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2590-1125
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T03:47:43Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Clinical Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
spelling doaj.art-3fa867ffb3694c2dbb3fcc82e13d78bd2022-12-22T00:39:29ZengElsevierClinical Parkinsonism & Related Disorders2590-11252022-01-016100142Efficacy and safety of two incobotulinumtoxinA injection intervals in cervical dystonia patients with inadequate benefit from standard injection intervals of botulinum toxin: Phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority studyCynthia Comella0Robert A. Hauser1Stuart H. Isaacson2Daniel Truong3Odinachi Oguh4Jennifer Hui5Eric S. Molho6Matthew Brodsky7Erin Furr-Stimming8Georg Comes9Michael A. Hast10David Charles11Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA; Corresponding author at: Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1747 Pleasant Valley Road NE, New Philadelphia, OH 22663, USA.Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Center of Excellence, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USAParkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Center of Boca Raton, Boca Raton, FL, USADepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA; The Parkinson and Movement Disorder Institute, Fountain Valley, CA, USACleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, USAUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USAAlbany Medical Center Neurosciences Institute, Albany, NY, USAOregon Health &amp; Science University, Portland, OR, USAThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USAMerz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, GermanyMerz Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Raleigh, NC, USADepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USAIntroductionSome patients with cervical dystonia (CD) receiving long-term botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) therapy report early waning of treatment benefit before the typical 12-week reinjection interval. Methods: This phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study (CD Flex; NCT01486264) compared 2 incobotulinumtoxinA injection schedules (Short Flex: 8 ± 2 weeks; Long Flex: 14 ± 2 weeks) in CD patients. Previous BoNT-responsive subjects who reported acceptable clinical benefit lasting < 10 weeks were recruited. Efficacy and safety were evaluated after 8 injection cycles. The primary endpoint was change in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale 4 weeks after the eighth injection. Secondary endpoints included TWSTRS total and subscale scores. Immunogenicity was assessed in a subset of patients. Results: Two hundred eighty-two CD patients were randomized and treated (Short Flex, N = 142; Long Flex, N = 140), and 207 completed the study. Significant improvements in TWSTRS severity from study baseline to 4 weeks after cycle 8 were observed in both the Short Flex (4.1 points; P < 0.0001) and Long Flex (2.4 points; P = 0.002) groups; Short Flex was noninferior to Long Flex (LS mean difference = 1.4 points; 95% CI = [−2.9, 0.1] < Δ = 2.0). Key secondary endpoints favored Short Flex intervals. Adverse events (AEs) were comparable between groups. There was no secondary loss of treatment effect. Conclusion: Injection cycles < 10 weeks for incobotulinumtoxinA are effective (and noninferior to longer intervals) for treating CD patients with early waning of clinical benefit. Shorter injection intervals did not increase AEs or lead to loss of treatment effect.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590112522000135Cervical dystoniaMovement disordersBotulinum toxinBoNTIncobotulinumtoxinA
spellingShingle Cynthia Comella
Robert A. Hauser
Stuart H. Isaacson
Daniel Truong
Odinachi Oguh
Jennifer Hui
Eric S. Molho
Matthew Brodsky
Erin Furr-Stimming
Georg Comes
Michael A. Hast
David Charles
Efficacy and safety of two incobotulinumtoxinA injection intervals in cervical dystonia patients with inadequate benefit from standard injection intervals of botulinum toxin: Phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study
Clinical Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
Cervical dystonia
Movement disorders
Botulinum toxin
BoNT
IncobotulinumtoxinA
title Efficacy and safety of two incobotulinumtoxinA injection intervals in cervical dystonia patients with inadequate benefit from standard injection intervals of botulinum toxin: Phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study
title_full Efficacy and safety of two incobotulinumtoxinA injection intervals in cervical dystonia patients with inadequate benefit from standard injection intervals of botulinum toxin: Phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of two incobotulinumtoxinA injection intervals in cervical dystonia patients with inadequate benefit from standard injection intervals of botulinum toxin: Phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of two incobotulinumtoxinA injection intervals in cervical dystonia patients with inadequate benefit from standard injection intervals of botulinum toxin: Phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study
title_short Efficacy and safety of two incobotulinumtoxinA injection intervals in cervical dystonia patients with inadequate benefit from standard injection intervals of botulinum toxin: Phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study
title_sort efficacy and safety of two incobotulinumtoxina injection intervals in cervical dystonia patients with inadequate benefit from standard injection intervals of botulinum toxin phase 4 open label randomized noninferiority study
topic Cervical dystonia
Movement disorders
Botulinum toxin
BoNT
IncobotulinumtoxinA
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590112522000135
work_keys_str_mv AT cynthiacomella efficacyandsafetyoftwoincobotulinumtoxinainjectionintervalsincervicaldystoniapatientswithinadequatebenefitfromstandardinjectionintervalsofbotulinumtoxinphase4openlabelrandomizednoninferioritystudy
AT robertahauser efficacyandsafetyoftwoincobotulinumtoxinainjectionintervalsincervicaldystoniapatientswithinadequatebenefitfromstandardinjectionintervalsofbotulinumtoxinphase4openlabelrandomizednoninferioritystudy
AT stuarthisaacson efficacyandsafetyoftwoincobotulinumtoxinainjectionintervalsincervicaldystoniapatientswithinadequatebenefitfromstandardinjectionintervalsofbotulinumtoxinphase4openlabelrandomizednoninferioritystudy
AT danieltruong efficacyandsafetyoftwoincobotulinumtoxinainjectionintervalsincervicaldystoniapatientswithinadequatebenefitfromstandardinjectionintervalsofbotulinumtoxinphase4openlabelrandomizednoninferioritystudy
AT odinachioguh efficacyandsafetyoftwoincobotulinumtoxinainjectionintervalsincervicaldystoniapatientswithinadequatebenefitfromstandardinjectionintervalsofbotulinumtoxinphase4openlabelrandomizednoninferioritystudy
AT jenniferhui efficacyandsafetyoftwoincobotulinumtoxinainjectionintervalsincervicaldystoniapatientswithinadequatebenefitfromstandardinjectionintervalsofbotulinumtoxinphase4openlabelrandomizednoninferioritystudy
AT ericsmolho efficacyandsafetyoftwoincobotulinumtoxinainjectionintervalsincervicaldystoniapatientswithinadequatebenefitfromstandardinjectionintervalsofbotulinumtoxinphase4openlabelrandomizednoninferioritystudy
AT matthewbrodsky efficacyandsafetyoftwoincobotulinumtoxinainjectionintervalsincervicaldystoniapatientswithinadequatebenefitfromstandardinjectionintervalsofbotulinumtoxinphase4openlabelrandomizednoninferioritystudy
AT erinfurrstimming efficacyandsafetyoftwoincobotulinumtoxinainjectionintervalsincervicaldystoniapatientswithinadequatebenefitfromstandardinjectionintervalsofbotulinumtoxinphase4openlabelrandomizednoninferioritystudy
AT georgcomes efficacyandsafetyoftwoincobotulinumtoxinainjectionintervalsincervicaldystoniapatientswithinadequatebenefitfromstandardinjectionintervalsofbotulinumtoxinphase4openlabelrandomizednoninferioritystudy
AT michaelahast efficacyandsafetyoftwoincobotulinumtoxinainjectionintervalsincervicaldystoniapatientswithinadequatebenefitfromstandardinjectionintervalsofbotulinumtoxinphase4openlabelrandomizednoninferioritystudy
AT davidcharles efficacyandsafetyoftwoincobotulinumtoxinainjectionintervalsincervicaldystoniapatientswithinadequatebenefitfromstandardinjectionintervalsofbotulinumtoxinphase4openlabelrandomizednoninferioritystudy