Effects of Kettlebell Load on Joint Kinetics and Global Characteristics during Overhead Swings in Women

This study sought to identify the changes in ankle, knee, and hip joint kinetics with increasing load while performing the kettlebell overhead swing (OHS). Women (n = 18, age: 29.4 ± 5.3 years, 69.7 ± 8.9 kg) with a minimum of 6 months of kettlebell swing training experience performed fifteen repeti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cullun Q. Watts, Kirsten Boessneck, Bryan L. Riemann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Sports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/10/12/203
_version_ 1797455231399755776
author Cullun Q. Watts
Kirsten Boessneck
Bryan L. Riemann
author_facet Cullun Q. Watts
Kirsten Boessneck
Bryan L. Riemann
author_sort Cullun Q. Watts
collection DOAJ
description This study sought to identify the changes in ankle, knee, and hip joint kinetics with increasing load while performing the kettlebell overhead swing (OHS). Women (n = 18, age: 29.4 ± 5.3 years, 69.7 ± 8.9 kg) with a minimum of 6 months of kettlebell swing training experience performed fifteen repetitions of the kettlebell OHS with three different kettlebell masses (8 kg, 12 kg, 16 kg) in a counterbalanced order. Ankle, knee, and hip joint kinematics were captured within a 12-camera infrared motion capture space, while standing atop two force plates collecting ground reaction force (GRF) data. Post hoc results of statistically significant joint by mass interactions (<i>p</i> < 0.05) of the net joint moment impulse, work, and peak power revealed the hip demonstrating the greatest increase in response to load, followed by the ankle (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The knee joint kinetics changed very little between the masses. Pairwise post hoc comparisons between the joints at each mass level support the kettlebell OHS as being a hip dominant exercise, with the knee making the second largest contribution, despite contributions not changing across kettlebell masses. Collectively, these results provide practitioners with objective evidence regarding the mechanical demands and effects of load changes on the kettlebell OHS.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:50:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-416c0096cba44fdcaa60cb9ff75b98cc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4663
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:50:26Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sports
spelling doaj.art-416c0096cba44fdcaa60cb9ff75b98cc2023-11-24T18:04:12ZengMDPI AGSports2075-46632022-12-01101220310.3390/sports10120203Effects of Kettlebell Load on Joint Kinetics and Global Characteristics during Overhead Swings in WomenCullun Q. Watts0Kirsten Boessneck1Bryan L. Riemann2Biodynamics and Human Performance Center, Armstrong Campus, Georgia Southern University, Savannah, GA 31419, USABiodynamics and Human Performance Center, Armstrong Campus, Georgia Southern University, Savannah, GA 31419, USABiodynamics and Human Performance Center, Armstrong Campus, Georgia Southern University, Savannah, GA 31419, USAThis study sought to identify the changes in ankle, knee, and hip joint kinetics with increasing load while performing the kettlebell overhead swing (OHS). Women (n = 18, age: 29.4 ± 5.3 years, 69.7 ± 8.9 kg) with a minimum of 6 months of kettlebell swing training experience performed fifteen repetitions of the kettlebell OHS with three different kettlebell masses (8 kg, 12 kg, 16 kg) in a counterbalanced order. Ankle, knee, and hip joint kinematics were captured within a 12-camera infrared motion capture space, while standing atop two force plates collecting ground reaction force (GRF) data. Post hoc results of statistically significant joint by mass interactions (<i>p</i> < 0.05) of the net joint moment impulse, work, and peak power revealed the hip demonstrating the greatest increase in response to load, followed by the ankle (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The knee joint kinetics changed very little between the masses. Pairwise post hoc comparisons between the joints at each mass level support the kettlebell OHS as being a hip dominant exercise, with the knee making the second largest contribution, despite contributions not changing across kettlebell masses. Collectively, these results provide practitioners with objective evidence regarding the mechanical demands and effects of load changes on the kettlebell OHS.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/10/12/203powerresistance trainingkettlebell trainingstrength and conditioningweightlifting
spellingShingle Cullun Q. Watts
Kirsten Boessneck
Bryan L. Riemann
Effects of Kettlebell Load on Joint Kinetics and Global Characteristics during Overhead Swings in Women
Sports
power
resistance training
kettlebell training
strength and conditioning
weightlifting
title Effects of Kettlebell Load on Joint Kinetics and Global Characteristics during Overhead Swings in Women
title_full Effects of Kettlebell Load on Joint Kinetics and Global Characteristics during Overhead Swings in Women
title_fullStr Effects of Kettlebell Load on Joint Kinetics and Global Characteristics during Overhead Swings in Women
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Kettlebell Load on Joint Kinetics and Global Characteristics during Overhead Swings in Women
title_short Effects of Kettlebell Load on Joint Kinetics and Global Characteristics during Overhead Swings in Women
title_sort effects of kettlebell load on joint kinetics and global characteristics during overhead swings in women
topic power
resistance training
kettlebell training
strength and conditioning
weightlifting
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/10/12/203
work_keys_str_mv AT cullunqwatts effectsofkettlebellloadonjointkineticsandglobalcharacteristicsduringoverheadswingsinwomen
AT kirstenboessneck effectsofkettlebellloadonjointkineticsandglobalcharacteristicsduringoverheadswingsinwomen
AT bryanlriemann effectsofkettlebellloadonjointkineticsandglobalcharacteristicsduringoverheadswingsinwomen