Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Librarians’ Pedagogical Approaches to Peer Review

INTRODUCTION This study is the first to consider how academic librarians’ understanding of and participation in the peer review process influences their information literacy pedagogy and practice. METHODS This mixed-methods study uses a modified sequential explanatory design, beginning with a survey...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gr Keer, Lana Mariko Wood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Iowa State University Digital Press 2021-03-01
Series:Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/article/id/12891/
_version_ 1797222093845168128
author Gr Keer
Lana Mariko Wood
author_facet Gr Keer
Lana Mariko Wood
author_sort Gr Keer
collection DOAJ
description INTRODUCTION This study is the first to consider how academic librarians’ understanding of and participation in the peer review process influences their information literacy pedagogy and practice. METHODS This mixed-methods study uses a modified sequential explanatory design, beginning with a survey of academic librarians in the United States and Canada, followed by interviews with interested study participants. RESULTS & DISCUSSION The researchers find that academic librarians frequently teach about peer review, but approaches vary widely, and though some have adapted the Framework to fit their instruction about peer review, there are no best practices. Instructor demands, the length of instructional sessions, and student level influence whether and how academic librarians contextualize the peer review process. While some academic librarians draw from their personal experience in the peer review process as authors, reviewers, and/or editors in their teaching, academic librarians do not consistently report their personal experience as an influence on their teaching of the peer review process to students. CONCLUSION This article argues that academic librarians should consider the place of peer review in information literacy instruction, including interrogating how scaffolding instruction about peer review may provide a disservice to students from an equity perspective. The authors urge academic librarians who have it to draw on personal experience to contextualize their instruction about peer review.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T13:15:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-429ebda928d146e2a110549bddc2d9c7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2162-3309
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T13:15:51Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Iowa State University Digital Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication
spelling doaj.art-429ebda928d146e2a110549bddc2d9c72024-04-04T17:34:23ZengIowa State University Digital PressJournal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication2162-33092021-03-019110.7710/2162-3309.2399Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Librarians’ Pedagogical Approaches to Peer ReviewGr Keer0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9408-0341Lana Mariko Wood1Information Studies, Cal State East Bay INTRODUCTION This study is the first to consider how academic librarians’ understanding of and participation in the peer review process influences their information literacy pedagogy and practice. METHODS This mixed-methods study uses a modified sequential explanatory design, beginning with a survey of academic librarians in the United States and Canada, followed by interviews with interested study participants. RESULTS & DISCUSSION The researchers find that academic librarians frequently teach about peer review, but approaches vary widely, and though some have adapted the Framework to fit their instruction about peer review, there are no best practices. Instructor demands, the length of instructional sessions, and student level influence whether and how academic librarians contextualize the peer review process. While some academic librarians draw from their personal experience in the peer review process as authors, reviewers, and/or editors in their teaching, academic librarians do not consistently report their personal experience as an influence on their teaching of the peer review process to students. CONCLUSION This article argues that academic librarians should consider the place of peer review in information literacy instruction, including interrogating how scaffolding instruction about peer review may provide a disservice to students from an equity perspective. The authors urge academic librarians who have it to draw on personal experience to contextualize their instruction about peer review.https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/article/id/12891/Academic librarianspeer reviewinformation literacy instructioncritical librarianship
spellingShingle Gr Keer
Lana Mariko Wood
Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Librarians’ Pedagogical Approaches to Peer Review
Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication
Academic librarians
peer review
information literacy instruction
critical librarianship
title Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Librarians’ Pedagogical Approaches to Peer Review
title_full Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Librarians’ Pedagogical Approaches to Peer Review
title_fullStr Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Librarians’ Pedagogical Approaches to Peer Review
title_full_unstemmed Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Librarians’ Pedagogical Approaches to Peer Review
title_short Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Librarians’ Pedagogical Approaches to Peer Review
title_sort problematizing peer review academic librarians pedagogical approaches to peer review
topic Academic librarians
peer review
information literacy instruction
critical librarianship
url https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/article/id/12891/
work_keys_str_mv AT grkeer problematizingpeerreviewacademiclibrarianspedagogicalapproachestopeerreview
AT lanamarikowood problematizingpeerreviewacademiclibrarianspedagogicalapproachestopeerreview