TARİH DERSLERİNDE FARKLI BECERİLERE SAHİP ÖĞRENCİLERE AYNI DERS KİTAPLARINI SUNMAK NE DERECE ADİLDİR? : HEİNEMANN YAYINEVİ ÖRNEĞİ

Contemporary approaches in education view students as individuals with different abilities. Instead of classifying and labeling students lazy/hard working, modern educational theories prefer to appreciate them as “less able/more able” by taking into account their skills and motivations. Thus, the qu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yücel KABAPINAR
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ahmet Simsek 2015-05-01
Series:Turkish History Education Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.tuhed.org/article/view/5000119573
_version_ 1797704788710785024
author Yücel KABAPINAR
author_facet Yücel KABAPINAR
author_sort Yücel KABAPINAR
collection DOAJ
description Contemporary approaches in education view students as individuals with different abilities. Instead of classifying and labeling students lazy/hard working, modern educational theories prefer to appreciate them as “less able/more able” by taking into account their skills and motivations. Thus, the question “Do textbooks need to be differentiated for students with different abilities” comes to the mind. The existing situation is to provide the same textbooks to all students even they possess different abilities. Thus, the present study aims to examine and make comparisons basic features of the two different history textbooks called as “core” and “foundation” published by Heinemann Publisher for the same graders with different abilities. Case study among the qualitative research designs was adopted in this study and document analysis method was benefitted since the history textbooks were the study group of the research. Two “core” and two “foundation” history textbooks published by Heinemann were examined in order to determine their basic features and find out their differences. The results of analysis of two types of the history textbooks called as “core” and “foundation” editions revealed that the foundation editions include less number of words and less number sentences as compared to the core counterparts. Similarly, the average number of words in the sentences and the number of abstract concepts were found to be less in foundation history textbooks
first_indexed 2024-03-12T05:26:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-455bcb96cc8847ec9559485d965283be
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2147-4516
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T05:26:32Z
publishDate 2015-05-01
publisher Ahmet Simsek
record_format Article
series Turkish History Education Journal
spelling doaj.art-455bcb96cc8847ec9559485d965283be2023-09-03T07:22:01ZengAhmet SimsekTurkish History Education Journal2147-45162015-05-014115617610.17497/tuhed.291595000110048TARİH DERSLERİNDE FARKLI BECERİLERE SAHİP ÖĞRENCİLERE AYNI DERS KİTAPLARINI SUNMAK NE DERECE ADİLDİR? : HEİNEMANN YAYINEVİ ÖRNEĞİYücel KABAPINAR0Marmara ÜniversitesiContemporary approaches in education view students as individuals with different abilities. Instead of classifying and labeling students lazy/hard working, modern educational theories prefer to appreciate them as “less able/more able” by taking into account their skills and motivations. Thus, the question “Do textbooks need to be differentiated for students with different abilities” comes to the mind. The existing situation is to provide the same textbooks to all students even they possess different abilities. Thus, the present study aims to examine and make comparisons basic features of the two different history textbooks called as “core” and “foundation” published by Heinemann Publisher for the same graders with different abilities. Case study among the qualitative research designs was adopted in this study and document analysis method was benefitted since the history textbooks were the study group of the research. Two “core” and two “foundation” history textbooks published by Heinemann were examined in order to determine their basic features and find out their differences. The results of analysis of two types of the history textbooks called as “core” and “foundation” editions revealed that the foundation editions include less number of words and less number sentences as compared to the core counterparts. Similarly, the average number of words in the sentences and the number of abstract concepts were found to be less in foundation history textbookshttp://www.tuhed.org/article/view/5000119573Tarih Ders Kitapları, Daha Az/Çok Yetenekli Öğrenciler, Çoklu
spellingShingle Yücel KABAPINAR
TARİH DERSLERİNDE FARKLI BECERİLERE SAHİP ÖĞRENCİLERE AYNI DERS KİTAPLARINI SUNMAK NE DERECE ADİLDİR? : HEİNEMANN YAYINEVİ ÖRNEĞİ
Turkish History Education Journal
Tarih Ders Kitapları, Daha Az/Çok Yetenekli Öğrenciler, Çoklu
title TARİH DERSLERİNDE FARKLI BECERİLERE SAHİP ÖĞRENCİLERE AYNI DERS KİTAPLARINI SUNMAK NE DERECE ADİLDİR? : HEİNEMANN YAYINEVİ ÖRNEĞİ
title_full TARİH DERSLERİNDE FARKLI BECERİLERE SAHİP ÖĞRENCİLERE AYNI DERS KİTAPLARINI SUNMAK NE DERECE ADİLDİR? : HEİNEMANN YAYINEVİ ÖRNEĞİ
title_fullStr TARİH DERSLERİNDE FARKLI BECERİLERE SAHİP ÖĞRENCİLERE AYNI DERS KİTAPLARINI SUNMAK NE DERECE ADİLDİR? : HEİNEMANN YAYINEVİ ÖRNEĞİ
title_full_unstemmed TARİH DERSLERİNDE FARKLI BECERİLERE SAHİP ÖĞRENCİLERE AYNI DERS KİTAPLARINI SUNMAK NE DERECE ADİLDİR? : HEİNEMANN YAYINEVİ ÖRNEĞİ
title_short TARİH DERSLERİNDE FARKLI BECERİLERE SAHİP ÖĞRENCİLERE AYNI DERS KİTAPLARINI SUNMAK NE DERECE ADİLDİR? : HEİNEMANN YAYINEVİ ÖRNEĞİ
title_sort tarih derslerinde farkli becerilere sahip ogrencilere ayni ders kitaplarini sunmak ne derece adildir heinemann yayinevi ornegi
topic Tarih Ders Kitapları, Daha Az/Çok Yetenekli Öğrenciler, Çoklu
url http://www.tuhed.org/article/view/5000119573
work_keys_str_mv AT yucelkabapinar tarihderslerindefarklibecerileresahipogrencilereayniderskitaplarinisunmaknedereceadildirheinemannyayineviornegi