Likely reasons for <i>Celestina</i> being considered an anonymous work in the 16th and 17th centuries, and Rojas' work since the 19th century

The interpretation of the paratexts of the Celestina in the light of the definitions of the Diccionario de Autoridades allows to differentiate between an anonymous «auctor» for the Carta and the «autor» identified in the acrostics, as well as to establish an equivalence between the old term «auctor»...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Remedios Prieto de la Iglesia, Antonio Sánchez Sánchez-Serrano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Valencia, Departamento de Filología Española 2021-01-01
Series:Celestinesca
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/celestinesca/article/view/20195