Gene dispersion is the key determinant of the read count bias in differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data
Abstract Background In differential expression analysis of RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) read count data for two sample groups, it is known that highly expressed genes (or longer genes) are more likely to be differentially expressed which is called read count bias (or gene length bias). This bias had gre...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-05-01
|
Series: | BMC Genomics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12864-017-3809-0 |
_version_ | 1811303066350125056 |
---|---|
author | Sora Yoon Dougu Nam |
author_facet | Sora Yoon Dougu Nam |
author_sort | Sora Yoon |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background In differential expression analysis of RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) read count data for two sample groups, it is known that highly expressed genes (or longer genes) are more likely to be differentially expressed which is called read count bias (or gene length bias). This bias had great effect on the downstream Gene Ontology over-representation analysis. However, such a bias has not been systematically analyzed for different replicate types of RNA-seq data. Results We show that the dispersion coefficient of a gene in the negative binomial modeling of read counts is the critical determinant of the read count bias (and gene length bias) by mathematical inference and tests for a number of simulated and real RNA-seq datasets. We demonstrate that the read count bias is mostly confined to data with small gene dispersions (e.g., technical replicates and some of genetically identical replicates such as cell lines or inbred animals), and many biological replicate data from unrelated samples do not suffer from such a bias except for genes with some small counts. It is also shown that the sample-permuting GSEA method yields a considerable number of false positives caused by the read count bias, while the preranked method does not. Conclusion We showed the small gene variance (similarly, dispersion) is the main cause of read count bias (and gene length bias) for the first time and analyzed the read count bias for different replicate types of RNA-seq data and its effect on gene-set enrichment analysis. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T07:41:09Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-4b5d2da50d744c7bad16ef3c30bdbdc1 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-2164 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T07:41:09Z |
publishDate | 2017-05-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Genomics |
spelling | doaj.art-4b5d2da50d744c7bad16ef3c30bdbdc12022-12-22T02:55:54ZengBMCBMC Genomics1471-21642017-05-0118111110.1186/s12864-017-3809-0Gene dispersion is the key determinant of the read count bias in differential expression analysis of RNA-seq dataSora Yoon0Dougu Nam1School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and TechnologySchool of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and TechnologyAbstract Background In differential expression analysis of RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) read count data for two sample groups, it is known that highly expressed genes (or longer genes) are more likely to be differentially expressed which is called read count bias (or gene length bias). This bias had great effect on the downstream Gene Ontology over-representation analysis. However, such a bias has not been systematically analyzed for different replicate types of RNA-seq data. Results We show that the dispersion coefficient of a gene in the negative binomial modeling of read counts is the critical determinant of the read count bias (and gene length bias) by mathematical inference and tests for a number of simulated and real RNA-seq datasets. We demonstrate that the read count bias is mostly confined to data with small gene dispersions (e.g., technical replicates and some of genetically identical replicates such as cell lines or inbred animals), and many biological replicate data from unrelated samples do not suffer from such a bias except for genes with some small counts. It is also shown that the sample-permuting GSEA method yields a considerable number of false positives caused by the read count bias, while the preranked method does not. Conclusion We showed the small gene variance (similarly, dispersion) is the main cause of read count bias (and gene length bias) for the first time and analyzed the read count bias for different replicate types of RNA-seq data and its effect on gene-set enrichment analysis.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12864-017-3809-0RNA-seqDifferential expression analysisRead count biasGene length biasDispersion |
spellingShingle | Sora Yoon Dougu Nam Gene dispersion is the key determinant of the read count bias in differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data BMC Genomics RNA-seq Differential expression analysis Read count bias Gene length bias Dispersion |
title | Gene dispersion is the key determinant of the read count bias in differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data |
title_full | Gene dispersion is the key determinant of the read count bias in differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data |
title_fullStr | Gene dispersion is the key determinant of the read count bias in differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data |
title_full_unstemmed | Gene dispersion is the key determinant of the read count bias in differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data |
title_short | Gene dispersion is the key determinant of the read count bias in differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data |
title_sort | gene dispersion is the key determinant of the read count bias in differential expression analysis of rna seq data |
topic | RNA-seq Differential expression analysis Read count bias Gene length bias Dispersion |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12864-017-3809-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sorayoon genedispersionisthekeydeterminantofthereadcountbiasindifferentialexpressionanalysisofrnaseqdata AT dougunam genedispersionisthekeydeterminantofthereadcountbiasindifferentialexpressionanalysisofrnaseqdata |