Modelling seizure rates rather than time to an event within clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs

Abstract Background Predictive models within epilepsy are frequently developed via Cox’s proportional hazards models. These models estimate risk of a specified event such as 12-month remission. They are relatively simple to produce, have familiar output, and are useful to answer questions about shor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura J. Bonnett, Jane L. Hutton, Anthony G. Marson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-04-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-020-00965-5
_version_ 1818540521157558272
author Laura J. Bonnett
Jane L. Hutton
Anthony G. Marson
author_facet Laura J. Bonnett
Jane L. Hutton
Anthony G. Marson
author_sort Laura J. Bonnett
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Predictive models within epilepsy are frequently developed via Cox’s proportional hazards models. These models estimate risk of a specified event such as 12-month remission. They are relatively simple to produce, have familiar output, and are useful to answer questions about short-term prognosis. However, the Cox model only considers time to first event rather than all seizures after starting treatment for example. This makes assessing change in seizure rates over time difficult. Variants to the Cox model exist enabling recurrent events to be modelled. One such variant is the Prentice, Williams and Peterson – Total Time (PWP-TT) model. An alternative is the negative binomial model for event counts. This study aims to demonstrate the differences between the three approaches, and to consider the benefits of the PWP-TT approach for assessing change in seizure rates over time. Methods Time to 12-month remission and time to first seizure after randomisation were modelled using the Cox model. Risk of seizure recurrence was modelled using the PWP-TT model, including all seizures across the whole follow-up period. Seizure counts were modelled using negative binomial regression. Differences between the approaches were demonstrated using participants recruited to the UK-based multi-centre Standard versus New Antiepileptic Drug (SANAD) study. Results Results from the PWP-TT model were similar to those from the conventional Cox and negative binomial models. In general, the direction of effect was consistent although the variables included in the models and the significance of the predictors varied. The confidence intervals obtained via the PWP-TT model tended to be narrower due to the increase in statistical power of the model. Conclusions The Cox model is useful for determining the initial response to treatment and potentially informing when the next intervention may be required. The negative binomial model is useful for modelling event counts. The PWP-TT model extends the Cox model to all included events. This is useful in determining the longer-term effects of treatment policy. Such a model should be considered when designing future clinical trials in medical conditions typified by recurrent events to improve efficiency and statistical power as well as providing evidence regarding changes in event rates over time.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T21:56:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-4bbc98769aa649ea9682fcfe34793f6c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2288
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T21:56:28Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
spelling doaj.art-4bbc98769aa649ea9682fcfe34793f6c2022-12-22T00:49:17ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882020-04-0120111410.1186/s12874-020-00965-5Modelling seizure rates rather than time to an event within clinical trials of antiepileptic drugsLaura J. Bonnett0Jane L. Hutton1Anthony G. Marson2Department of Biostatistics, University of LiverpoolDepartment of Statistics, University of WarwickDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Clinical Sciences Centre, Aintree University Hospital, University of Liverpool, L9 7LJ & The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, members of the Liverpool Health PartnersAbstract Background Predictive models within epilepsy are frequently developed via Cox’s proportional hazards models. These models estimate risk of a specified event such as 12-month remission. They are relatively simple to produce, have familiar output, and are useful to answer questions about short-term prognosis. However, the Cox model only considers time to first event rather than all seizures after starting treatment for example. This makes assessing change in seizure rates over time difficult. Variants to the Cox model exist enabling recurrent events to be modelled. One such variant is the Prentice, Williams and Peterson – Total Time (PWP-TT) model. An alternative is the negative binomial model for event counts. This study aims to demonstrate the differences between the three approaches, and to consider the benefits of the PWP-TT approach for assessing change in seizure rates over time. Methods Time to 12-month remission and time to first seizure after randomisation were modelled using the Cox model. Risk of seizure recurrence was modelled using the PWP-TT model, including all seizures across the whole follow-up period. Seizure counts were modelled using negative binomial regression. Differences between the approaches were demonstrated using participants recruited to the UK-based multi-centre Standard versus New Antiepileptic Drug (SANAD) study. Results Results from the PWP-TT model were similar to those from the conventional Cox and negative binomial models. In general, the direction of effect was consistent although the variables included in the models and the significance of the predictors varied. The confidence intervals obtained via the PWP-TT model tended to be narrower due to the increase in statistical power of the model. Conclusions The Cox model is useful for determining the initial response to treatment and potentially informing when the next intervention may be required. The negative binomial model is useful for modelling event counts. The PWP-TT model extends the Cox model to all included events. This is useful in determining the longer-term effects of treatment policy. Such a model should be considered when designing future clinical trials in medical conditions typified by recurrent events to improve efficiency and statistical power as well as providing evidence regarding changes in event rates over time.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-020-00965-5Cox modelPWP-TTNegative binomialEpilepsySeizures
spellingShingle Laura J. Bonnett
Jane L. Hutton
Anthony G. Marson
Modelling seizure rates rather than time to an event within clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Cox model
PWP-TT
Negative binomial
Epilepsy
Seizures
title Modelling seizure rates rather than time to an event within clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs
title_full Modelling seizure rates rather than time to an event within clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs
title_fullStr Modelling seizure rates rather than time to an event within clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs
title_full_unstemmed Modelling seizure rates rather than time to an event within clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs
title_short Modelling seizure rates rather than time to an event within clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs
title_sort modelling seizure rates rather than time to an event within clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs
topic Cox model
PWP-TT
Negative binomial
Epilepsy
Seizures
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-020-00965-5
work_keys_str_mv AT laurajbonnett modellingseizureratesratherthantimetoaneventwithinclinicaltrialsofantiepilepticdrugs
AT janelhutton modellingseizureratesratherthantimetoaneventwithinclinicaltrialsofantiepilepticdrugs
AT anthonygmarson modellingseizureratesratherthantimetoaneventwithinclinicaltrialsofantiepilepticdrugs